Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Aryan Communism

@AryanCommunism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002668388879
TypeChannel
Username@AryanCommunism
DescriptionTaking Communism back from the jews.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AryanCommunism

Growth

787 August 2026 — 78 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 20:0178no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:0378first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.7%
avg views ÷ 78 subscribers
Avg views / post
55.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,118
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
533
Videos
87
Links
279

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17m 37s
Average length
17m 37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1639.0%
😁1126.8%
🔥819.5%
🤣614.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC9 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @AdolfNigler148Photo

If Palestinians were anti-White I wouldn’t blame them. Why would you support White Nationalists when White Nationalists are irrelevant and want you to be exterminated?

😁1

9 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I'm going to just go out and say it. I know it will be controversial, but I don't care any longer. Arabs are just better than Whites. There, I said it. Whites are too busy crying and whining while the jew owns us, while Arabs actually DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT! Honorary nothing. Arabs are White, end of story. Nobody else is actually challenging jewish power and fighting ZOG like the Arabs are. I don't believe in any pho

💯1

9 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC21 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @dearrabbi

So many brownoids. I hope America does a ground invasion of Iran just so hundreds of thousands of non-Whites die, and I'm definitely not talking about the Iranians, who are 100% White Aryans.

8 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://youtu.be/ZfZwiw5Dpx0?t=6003 "If you're a person who's ever said 'just turn it into glass, just kill 'em all' you've been judaized...you're no better than some Israeli who's calling for turning Gaza into glass....you've just been judaized...you're not white anymore. You don't think like a white person anymore"

🔥1😁1

8 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC27 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

A lot of people have doubts about Tucker Carlson, but I'm going to stand with Eric Striker. Eric Striker is almost never wrong and I personally venerate him as close as I can to being a religious figure. Tucker Carlson has his flaws, but he is clearly a closeted Nazbol and worth following.

💯3😁2

7 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC175 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2🤣1

7 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC68 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

One thing that needs to be popularized in our circles is that white trash redneck creekshitters aren't White, just like the working class isn't White, just like how Christians aren't White, just like how military aren't White, just like how rightoids aren't White. You know who is at least Honorary White? Arabs, Chinese, Iranians. Islam is a far Whiter religion than christianity while christianity is a jewish and bro

🔥3😁1

6 Aug 2026, 04:14 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

And this is why the democrats must win at all costs. DEATH TO AMERICA

😁2🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC39 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

From my experience when someone whines about 'muh third worldism' that person is often just a jew loving subhuman that needs to suffer. Because the only groups of people (for now) physically attacking jewry are nonwhites, philosemites will then say something along the lines of not liking kikes being 'brown coded' despite the most philosemetic nations (that must suffer) being very non-white. Anyways its funny as hell

💯4

5 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @FatherlessRetardsNonWorkersPartyPhoto

Because the Right is full of Jew loving Rightoids. Also the Right is spiritually (and literally) Brown with Small Business Scams.

💯2

4 Aug 2026, 19:42 UTC34 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @warrenbalogh88Photo

If you live in Michigan, get out there today and deliver a blow to the Jews by voting for Abdul el-Sayed against the Zionist abomination Haley Stevens. Michigan has an open primary system, so you can vote in the Democratic primary whether you are registered Democrat, Republican, independent or whatever. This is the most important election in the country right now and defeating Stevens will be a huge blow against AI

🤣3🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AryanCommunism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 584,204 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aryan Communism” (@AryanCommunism), 78 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AryanCommunism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.