4 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
https://youtu.be/FVky95cVr5U?si=c7SyAdFRDmKfFSh-
Channel
ANVAR ESHNAZAR
@AnvarEshnazarov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
212subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001249427626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AnvarEshnazarov |
| Created | 5 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AnvarEshnazarov |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 212 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 15:22 | 213 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 214 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:29 | 213 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 211 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 211 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
4 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC32 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jalilovqaydlar
Iqtisodchi Botir Qobilov yozmoqda: "Hozirgi lotinga 30 yil davomida o'tmagan odam yangi lotinga ertaga nimaga o'tishi kerak? Uni shu paytgacha kirillda ushlab turgan sabab Sh va Ch bo'lganiga qanday dalil bor? Hech qanday. Hech kim kafolat bermaydi, yuqorida tilga olinganlar va mutlaqo hamma ertadan kirilldan lotinga o'tadi deb. Baribir kirillda yozaverishadi, ayniqsa buni oqlayotganlar ko'pchilikni dumli Sh va Chga…
4 Aug 2026, 02:22 UTC30 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
Jamiyatimizda va o'zbek tilidagi axborot makonida kirill yozuvining qamrovi haligacha juda keng ekan. U nafaqat 30 yil o'tib saqlanib qolgan, balki faol ishlatilmoqda ham ekan. Menimcha, alifbo masalasidagi asosiy muammolardan biri aynan shu edi. Alifbo va til islohoti deyilganda men, avvalo, kirilldan batamom voz kechib, jamiyatni amaldagi lotin yozuviga to‘liq o‘tkazish haqida gap ketadi, deb o‘ylagandim. U o'tish …
3 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
#Mutolaa 20. Grigoriy Petrovning "Oq nilufarlar yurtida" asarini ham o'qib tugatdim.
3 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC39 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
1 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mirzodanmaktub
Avvalboshda xolis kechayotgan bahslar — har ikki tomonning obyektiv fikrlari sekin-asta davlat OAV, nashrlari va ba’zi jurnalist, bloggerlar to‘rtta harfning o‘zgarishini oqlab berishi, maqolalarning o‘chirtirilayotgani / joyiga qaytarib qo‘yishlari xuddiki yon bosish kampaniyasiga aylanib boryapti. Ular orasida bu “takomillashuv” budjetga ortiqcha zarar yetkazmasligidan tortib yangicha klaviaturalarga o‘tish osonli…
👍1
1 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
"Vahima qilyapsiz, bor-yo'g'i 2-4 ta harf o‘zgaryaptiku", "masalani chuqur o‘rganmay, yuzaki fikrlayapsiz", ham deyishadi. Albatta, aynan yuzaki! Men avval eng yuzada ko'rinadigan (lekin baribir muhim bo'lgan), hayolimga kelgan muammolarni sanadim, misol keltirdim: email, aviachipta, pasportdagi MRZ, ism-familiyaning turli bazalarda turlicha yozilishi, uzilgan avlodlar vhkz. Chunki bularni sodda misolda tushuntirish…
👍1
1 Aug 2026, 05:47 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @jalilovqaydlar
Alifbo bilan bogʻliq koʻp muammolarning yechimi - kirillcha fikrlashdan voz kechish Professor Nizomiddin Mahmudov oʻz maqolasida alifboni oʻzgartirish uchun keltirgan sabablarni koʻrsangiz, "muammo" deb koʻrsatilayotgan koʻp narsaning ildizi aslida kirillcha paradigmada fikrlash va lotin yozuvini kirill yozuviga solishtirish ekanligini tushunish qiyin emas. Sh va ch ni ş va ç ga almashtirish "zarurati". Masalan, me…
1 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC33 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
Mening bir taklifim bor. Chni dumli C, Shni dumli S qilsak, hech qanday muammo bo‘lmaydi, deb chin dildan ishonayotgan ekspertlar bu yangilikni butun boshli 40 million kishiga yoppasiga joriy qilishdan, 1-sentabr kuni maktabga chiqadigan bolalarimizni yangi Ş va Ç bilan savod chiqarishga majbur qilishdan oldin, balki avval o'zlarida tajriba qilib korish kerakdir. Ism-familiyalarini aytishsin va olti oy davomida kund…
1 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
Agar menga o'xshab 1990-yillarning oxirida maktabga chiqqan bo'lsangiz, xonadoningizda o'zbek tilida uch xil yozuvda savod chiqargan uch avlod bo'ladi. Ota-onangiz kirillda o'rgangan, siz amaldagi lotin yozuvida, farzandingiz esa ertaga maktabga chiqsa, yangi lotin yozuvida o'rganadi. De-fakto, hozir o'zbek tilidagi deyarli barcha rasmiy va norasmiy matnlar ikki yozuvda- kirill va lotinda takroran beriladi. Kirillda…
1 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
Alifbo islohoti haqida savol bersam, gapirsam, yozsam darrov meni "o'zgarishga qarshi", "eski alifboni, eski xatoni himoya qilyapti" yoki "tilshunos emassiz, jim turing" degan toifaga chiqarayotganlar ham bor. Avvalo, men hozirgi alifboni ideal, tarixan to'g'ri yoki juda qulay deb himoya qilmayapman. Unda muammolar bordir, ba'zi texnik asoslar yo'q emasdir. Mening asosiy gapim boshqa: uzluksizlik, avlodlar orasidagi…
1 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekonomics
Yana bir qiziq joyi - bu tilchilarning ishi, iqtisodchilar aralashmasin degan gaplarni ham o'qiyapman. Laqillayotgan ekanmiz shunchaki. Bu juda g'alati qarash. O'zbek tili tilshunoslarning xususiy mulki emasku. Alifbo faqat tovushlarni qog'ozga tushirish vositasi ham emas. U pasport, bank, soliq, diplom, viza, aviachipta, davlat registrlari, ilmiy maqolalar va minglab axborot tizimlarida ishlatiladigan katta infrat…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AnvarEshnazarov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANVAR ESHNAZAR” (@AnvarEshnazarov), 212 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnvarEshnazarov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.