Channel
@Anonrah1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
137subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001203223638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Anonrah1 |
| Description | Es wird hier über alles berichtet was unser System gerne verschweigt, vertuscht usw. Von Politik, Wirtschaft. Medien. Medizin, Archäologie und mehr... HIER ABONNIEREN ❗❗ ⬇️ https://t.me/Anonrah1 Täglich neue Videos und Infos |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Anonrah1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 137 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 137 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 19 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 29 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
A videotape that really shows the disappearance of a man. Just disappeared. ZONA🛸 X
Humanoide Maschinen lesen jetzt Gesichter und Gefühle auf der Weltroboterkonferenz in Peking
Du kennst doch diese essbaren Insekten, von denen du immer wieder hörst, dass du sie bald essen wirst? Nun, wie sich herausstellte, wurde in einer äußerst strengen Studie eine ganze Reihe von Parasiten im "Viehbestand" von 81 % der Insektenfarmen gefunden. Außerdem waren diese Parasiten in 30 bis 35 % der untersuchten Betriebe für Tiere und/oder Menschen pathogen. Das Ungeziefer ist also nicht nur eine ekelhafte Id…
Hans-Georg Maaßen, ehemaliger Präsident des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz spricht Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach die Geisteskräfte ab und schlägt eine ärztliche Untersuchung vor 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 📌 hilfreiche Produkte ➡️ www.blaupause.tv/shop.html 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 📌 blaupause.tv abonnieren ➡️ @blaupausetv 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Dr. Naomi Wolf: "Die FDA hat den Kopf in den Sand gesteckt, als 44% der schwangeren Studienteilnehmerinnen Fehlgeburten erlitten" Aus einem unter gerichtlicher Anordnung freigegebenen Dokument geht hervor, dass 44 % der schwangeren Frauen, die an der mRNA-COVID-Impfstoffstudie von Pfizer teilnahmen, Fehlgeburten erlitten. Dr. Naomi Wolf: "Vor über einem Jahr erhielt die FDA diesen Bericht, dass von 50 schwangeren F…
Ein Starker Geist
José Mujica, ehemaliger Präsident von Urugay und Blumenzüchter, mit ein paar Worten an uns die jeder gehört haben sollte. 👍 Eine bewundernswerte Persönlichkeit von denen sich die meisten Politiker mal ne ganz dicke Scheibe abschneiden sollten. 😉 Jetzt den Kanal abonnieren und teilen 🌏💚🙏 👉 @bewusst_vegan_froh🔥
Posted without readable text
Drei Fragen an Olaf Scholz (Meine anderen Kanäle: YouTube: https://tinyurl.com/1pz8slts | Twitter: https://twitter.com/hori_____zont | Odysee: https://odysee.com/@_horizont_:b | GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/_horizont_ )
China: Immer mehr Menschen kollabieren und sterben in den durchgeimpften China. Viele sterben mitten auf ihrer Fahrt und fallen direkt danach vom Fahrrad oder Motorrad herunter!
Bill Gates will offiziell mit seinem genbasierten Stechmücken-Experiment nix mehr zu tun haben, weil es schief gegangen ist! ES GING GLEICH DOPPELT SCHIEF!
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Anonrah1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,167,821 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Anonrah1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anon Rah” (@Anonrah1), 137 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anonrah1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.