Channel
@Alphaton_box
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001928448578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alphaton_box |
| Description | 丟一下社交任務、碎片發現、此頻道所提供任何資訊請自己研究。 任何操作皆不代表投資建議。 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alphaton_box |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 207 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 207 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 33.3% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2025 to 16 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Alphaton_box. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2025 to 16 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
最近實測了從 Fluidkey 發起 ACH 到 IB，試驗成功，來分享給大家。 每月免費額度就有 3,000 U 步驟： - 傳送 USDC-Base 到 Fluidkey 帳戶 ( 可開一個 Rabby 連 ) - 點選發送 / 選擇 USDC / 按圖片中的 Bank 填寫 ACH 資訊 ( 記得到 IB 拿 ) - 新增完 ACH 資訊之後，發送你要存進 IB 的 USDC 即可 昨日發出申請，大概 24 小時候 IB 收到資金到帳通知。 有興趣的可以參考我的推薦碼： https://i.fluidkey.com/87BMT5 ( 是說我也不知道邀請能幹嘛，又沒講 )
🌌 認識 Boros：讓「資金費率」成為被交易的市場 Boros 系統把「1 單位底層資產的資金費率」鑄成一個 Yield Unit（YU）。交易時不是用價格報價，而是用 Implied APR（隱含年化） 報價，也就是市場對未來平均資金費率的共識。( 熟悉 Pendle V2 的朋友，沒錯，基本上就是 YT ) 你可以做兩種倉位： ⚫️Long YU：付固定、收浮動（收到底層永續市場的資金費率）。 ⚫️Short YU：付浮動、收固定（把未來浮動收益對掉成固定）。 撮合在一個以 APR 為刻度的訂單簿，限價單是 GTC（一直掛到成交或到期取消）。清算與未實現損益用 Mark Implied APR 來算，避免瞬時操縱。到期時，倉位的剩餘價值線性歸零、收益結算到你的抵押品。 名詞一覽 ( 按箭頭可打開 ) - YU（Yield Unit）：1 單位底層資產的「資金費率現金流」權利。例：BTC/Hyperliquid …
🙏1
💱OKX 賺幣活動又來惹 最大申購數量 - 500 OKB - 2 BTC - 50,000 USDT OKB 池子的 XPL 比其他兩個多了 100,000 XPL 塞滿約 37 萬 U。 能塞滿的，有缺乾兒子、乾弟弟的，都可以跟我說，我配合度高。😂
❤1👍1
月底 BN Wallet 活動結束後，看看這邊池子還有沒有高 APR。 目前池子很小，塞不下鯨魚。 @CurveAppBot
📰 通過機器人實施的欺詐方案。 👿 近期出現越來越多的案例，攻擊者通過轉移機器人的所有權來刪除受害者的賬戶。 方案流程描述： 1. 攻擊者建立看似無害的機器人。 2. 隨機受害者啟動該機器人。 3. 這一步足以讓攻擊者將該機器人的所有權轉移給受害者。 4. 通過 API，使用 setMyName，攻擊者將機器人的名稱更改為模仿 Telegram 支援或 @wallet 錢包。 5. 攻擊者大量舉報該機器人，隨後機器人被自動刪除，而你的帳戶可能因「詐欺」被刪除。 💡 建議： ⚫️ 不要啟動未知的機器人，即使有人說服你或請求你啟動，或你在搜索中發現它們。 ⚫️ 啟動 @BotFather；它會通知你收到的新機器人。 ⚫️ 如果這樣的機器人被轉移給你，立即使用 /deletebot 命令刪除它，選擇具體機器人並確認操作。 ⚫️ 如果你覺得沒有問題，可以簡單地重置令牌（/revoke）並更改機器人的名稱（/editbot）。 新聞…
$TAC 的代幣經濟 https://www.tac.build/blog/introducing-tac-token-utility-and-tokenomics-of-the-tac-protocol-token 質押網站：https://staking.tac.build/
CB 不再是完全 0 fee 囉！
謝天謝地，我的 Telegram 限制終於被解開了，用的是富豪群的解法，如果你跟我一樣，有被誤封的情況，歡迎採用以下的解決方法。 解除限制的方法： 👉第一步：搜索 @spambot 👉第二步：點選 /Start 👉第三步：點選 /This is a mistake 👉第四步：點選 /yes 👉第五步：點選 /No! Never did that! 👉第六步：回覆 I can't take the initiative to send messages to others. I'm not sending advertisements or harassing others? This is unreasonable. You cannot restrict me. Please check with your company. This is my personal account. I have been using it …
❤1
目前 TeFi 活動上，前兩名都是超級巨鯨，但第三名很有趣，他是 YT 巨鯨。 透過購買 77,613 的 YT-stgUSD 來農出最高積分，獲取第三名寶座，目前預估能獲得 1,990 U 的空投。 估計他是在 YT 較低價時就購買，因為現在這個策略已經不划算了。( 也沒這麼多 YT 流動性了 ) 第三名地址：https://tonviewer.com/UQCgNEBpbaQXZy8tGvDtdpipPDoyULd-shhMoxhOgYmsRyWm?section=tokens
👌1
Howard 做的 Dune 儀錶板 https://dune.com/Howard_Peng/telegram-gifts
👍1
🎁Kissed Frog - x1089 🎁Scared Cat - x587 🎁Plush Pepe - x573 🎁Electric Skull - x444 🎁Voodoo Doll - x432 🎁Ion Gem - x396 來源：https://t.me/TON_Cabal/1755
Tonnel 系列收藏查詢教學
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Alphaton_box. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 904,921 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Alpha 倉庫” (@Alphaton_box), 207 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alphaton_box.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.