Channel
@All_Group
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
244subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001108506921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @All_Group |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/All_Group |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @gardening/538819 Sept 2020, 17:46 UTC | @All_Group/1400 · this entry19 Sept 2020, 17:47 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @All_Group/1402 · this entry4 Nov 2020, 13:31 UTC | @gardening/53894 Nov 2020, 13:35 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| @gardening/53931 Oct 2021, 11:24 UTC | @All_Group/1410 · this entry1 Oct 2021, 11:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @gardening/539921 May 2022, 10:08 UTC | @All_Group/1412 · this entry21 May 2022, 10:08 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @gardening | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @gardening (5–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 July 2020 to 1 June 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @gardening. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 244 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 245 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:10 | 245 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 September 2019 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Welcome తెలుగుజాతి తెలుగు ప్రజలు తెలుగు గ్రూపులు Telugu Groups Telugu People Global Best Offers https://t.me/Global_Best_Offers Friends are forever https://t.me/+RfUNJw_IRy84NmU9 Best Offers Discussion https://t.me/+RmFr25aD5tM2Y2Y1
Signed Love is life
కోటీశ్వరులు కావాలంటే... ఫ్రెండ్స్ ఎవరికైనా ఒకే లక్ష్యం ఉంటుంది మన పిల్లలు కోటీశ్వరులు కావాలి. ఇన్ఫోసిస్ అనే కంపెనీ లో 1993 పదివేల రూపాయలు ఇన్వెస్ట్ చేసి ఉంటే ఈరోజు నాలుగు కోట్ల రూపాయల ఆదాయం వచ్చింది. ఫ్రెండ్స్ స్టాక్ మార్కెట్ గురించి మీకు ఎంతో తెలియజెప్పాలని ప్రయత్నం చేస్తున్నాను మంచి కంపెనీలలో షేర్లు కొని ఎక్కువ కాలం కొనసాగడం ద్వారానే మీ పిల్లలు అత్యున్నతంగా జీవించే అవకాశం ఉంటుంది కనుక ఒక్కసారి ఆలోచించండి సంపద పెరగడ…
Signed Love is life
కోటీశ్వరులు కావాలంటే... ఫ్రెండ్స్ ఎవరికైనా ఒకే లక్ష్యం ఉంటుంది మన పిల్లలు కోటీశ్వరులు కావాలి ఇలాంటి లక్ష్యం ఉన్న ప్రతి వ్యక్తి నేను పంపిన ఆడియో పూర్తిగా వినండి. పూర్తి సమాచారం కోసం నేను పంపిన ఆడియోను విని ఆచరించిన వ్యక్తి జీవితంలో ఎప్పుడూ ఓటమి ఉండదు. ఇన్ఫోసిస్ అనే కంపెనీ లో 1993 పదివేల రూపాయలు ఇన్వెస్ట్ చేసి ఉంటే ఈరోజు నాలుగు కోట్ల రూపాయల ఆదాయం వచ్చింది. ఫ్రెండ్స్ స్టాక్ మార్కెట్ గురించి మీకు ఎంతో తెలియజెప్పాలని ప్…
Signed Love is life
Angel Broking is offering Free Account opening and Special Brokerage Rates – Delivery Trades | Flat orders Intraday & FNO. Hurry! Join me on Angel Broking in next 48 hours to avail. https://5minwebsite.angelbroking.com/Diykyc/SubbrokerLead?SbTag=VkVMUEE=&BType=VkJC&a=0
Signed Love is life
Movies Web series https://invite.viber.com/?g2=AQB%2F8zIpdEeBSU3DMn6rCKxkHpV%2FSzyfBsCBI5hfayYvKVFhBQcKa7c84mp9m7Ce
Signed Love is life
Do follow us on telegram jatiratnalu 18+ @jatiratnalu
Signed Love is life
Do follow us on telegram jatiratnalu 18+ @jatiratnalu
Signed Love is life
https://kuklink.com/1/bnYyZTUxMDAwendv
Signed Love is life
Posted without readable text
Signed Love is life
Posted without readable text
Signed Love is life
https://t.me/joinchat/EAtRp0i1IVUhwvJPzqvHoQ I'm looking for the Gaya ticket, do you have it with you? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/bvPNJi I'm looking for the Puri ticket, do you have it with you? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/Nmf2jX I've visited 15 cities in the game on Google Pay. Join me? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/ds2185
Signed Love is life
I'm looking for the Bengaluru ticket, do you have it with you? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/MXzfqHh I'm looking for the Kochi ticket, do you have it with you? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/ZmXh1m I've visited 12 cities in the game on Google Pay. Join me? https://gpay.app.goo.gl/TVB98v https://t.me/joinchat/EAtRp0i1IVUhwvJPzqvHoQ
Signed Love is life
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @All_Group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 802,794 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@All_Group named 30 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jio ads 24” (@All_Group), 244 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/All_Group.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.