Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alex Royce in crypto

@Alex_Royce_BTC

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · View velocity · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

1,189,514subscribers

+4,824 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001686685379
TypeChannel
Username@Alex_Royce_BTC
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alex_Royce_BTC

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,177,6261,189,5141,183,5707 August 2026 — 1,184,690 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,183,812 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,181,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,180,375 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,177,631 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,177,626 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,180,440 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,189,514 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +4,824. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,175,843–1,191,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:481,189,514+9,074
12 Aug 2026, 05:481,180,440+2,814
11 Aug 2026, 07:581,177,626-5
10 Aug 2026, 04:451,177,631-2,744
9 Aug 2026, 06:411,180,375-1,209
8 Aug 2026, 09:031,181,584-2,228
7 Aug 2026, 10:111,183,812-878
7 Aug 2026, 05:011,184,690first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.095%
avg views ÷ 1,189,514 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.525%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held44 (31 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total48,423
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 23 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 19of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 8.2 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 22.7% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 62.1% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 782 views0.066% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 831).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/348713 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC74 minutes4.9 hours old398 views4 reactions60 minutes: 183 interp.3.0 hours: 317 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h68 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/348612 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC2559 minutes19 hours old733 views7 reactions60 minutes: 1743.0 hours: 3266.0 hours: 40012 hours: 472still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h4.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/348512 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC2912 minutes21 hours old671 views6 reactions60 minutes: 1603.0 hours: 325 interp.6.0 hours: 42312 hours: 473still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h3.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/348412 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC339 minutes24 hours old783 views5 reactions60 minutes: 187 interp.3.0 hours: 3456.0 hours: 53412 hours: 61224 hours: 783still climbing at last reading783measured3.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/348312 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC3953 minutes29 hours old787 views5 reactions60 minutes: 169 interp.3.0 hours: 2946.0 hours: 46512 hours: 66024 hours: 725still climbing at last reading725measured5.2 hours
/348211 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC5366 minutes44 hours old957 views5 reactions3.0 hours: 3246.0 hours: 42012 hours: 50524 hours: 862still climbing at last reading862measured11 hours
/348111 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC6122 minutes2 days old920 views6 reactions60 minutes: 178 interp.3.0 hours: 3086.0 hours: 45012 hours: 59124 hours: 7712 days: 920still climbing at last reading771measured6.0 hours
/348011 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC6149 minutes2 days old716 views4 reactions60 minutes: 139 interp.3.0 hours: 246 interp.6.0 hours: 36912 hours: 49224 hours: 5942 days: 704still climbing at last reading594measured5.6 hours

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 42 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15462.1%
👍5522.2%
🔥156.05%
👏114.44%
🤔83.23%
🥰31.21%
🥴20.806%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC398 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Trump Media Overhauls Crypto Treasury Strategy After $238M Q2 Loss Trump Media & Technology Group announced a revamp of its crypto treasury strategy alongside its second-quarter financial results, which showed a $238.1 million loss for the period. The company disclosed the updated approach on August 10, citing digital asset volatility and balance-sheet management as driving factors. Bitcoin remains central to the c

3🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC733 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Bank of England Tests Stablecoin and Digital Pound Interoperability in Trade Finance The Bank of England's Digital Pound Lab has entered Phase 2, bringing in NOBO Finance, Dun & Bradstreet and Polygon Labs to test cross-border trade finance flows that combine stablecoin payments with simulated digital pound settlement. The scenario under examination involves exporters receiving stablecoins while importers settle tr

4👍3

12 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC671 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💚 Get 100 USDT from QZINO 💚 Start playing on QZINO and make the most of your free bonus. 🎁 50 USDT with promo code 50TAPS 😌 50 USDT for new users via the link ➡️ No KYC Only the fastest will manage to claim the promo 😉 Register now and claim your bonus ➡️ HERE

3👍3

12 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC783 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Senate CLARITY Act Vote Sets Up High-Stakes September for Crypto September is shaping up as a pivotal month for the crypto industry, with two major events converging: a Senate vote on the CLARITY Act and a Federal Reserve interest rate decision. The CLARITY Act, a comprehensive crypto market structure bill, is moving toward a Senate floor vote that could determine how digital assets are classified and regulated in

👍32

12 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC787 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Harmony Protocol Hit by Unauthorized Mint of 4 Billion ONE Tokens Harmony Protocol has confirmed an exploit in which an attacker minted approximately 4 billion ONE tokens without authorization, equivalent to roughly 26% of the token's total supply. The attack caused ONE to drop more than 30%, with the price falling to an all-time low as the newly minted tokens were moved through the network. The exploit was first f

2👏2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC957 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ravencoin Falls 20% as Critical Exploit Triggers Potential Four-Day Chain Rollback A critical block flaw on the Ravencoin network has sent RVN down 20%, with two mining pools controlling the majority of the network's hashpower now actively building a replacement chain from before Friday's first invalid block. If the rollback succeeds, four days of transactions — including deposits, withdrawals and payments processe

👍2🤔2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC920 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Keel Shuts Down All U.S. Bitcoin Mining as Operating Loss Reaches $141 Million Keel, formerly known as Bitfarms, has completed the shutdown of its entire U.S. Bitcoin mining operation. The company now has no active mining business in the United States and no signed data center tenant. Revenue fell by roughly half while the operating loss reached $141 million. With $819 million in liquidity at stake, the company's f

2👍2👏2

11 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC716 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @aifuturetechnewsPhoto

💻 Musk plans $16.8B "Terafab" chip factory in Texas SpaceX and Tesla are planning a chip manufacturing facility called Terafab in Grimes County, Texas, with a projected cost of $16.8 billion. The facility would span over 100 million square feet — roughly five times the size of the world's current largest building. Source

👏21🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC911 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

BlackRock Cuts IBIT Bitcoin Conversion Minimum by 96% to $1 Million BlackRock has lowered the in-kind conversion minimum for its iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from $25 million to $1 million — a 96% reduction that opens the fund's redemption mechanism to a significantly broader range of investors. Robbie Mitchnick, BlackRock's head of digital assets, disclosed the change during a Bloomberg Television interview. The a

2👍2

10 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Vitalik Buterin Overhauls Ethereum Roadmap, Prioritizing Privacy and Quantum Resistance Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has replaced the network's previous six-phase roadmap with a new architectural blueprint he calls "Lean Ethereum," describing it as the protocol's "third major iteration." The updated roadmap places post-quantum cryptography and privacy at the center of Ethereum's near-term development priorit

2👏2🥴2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC942 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Important reminder: We are holding a Giveaway from Telegram! 📱 Subscribers who have met the conditions (subscribing to channels in our network) are waiting for 5 prizes: 6 months of Premium! ⭐️ Check your participation and invite friends 🤩

🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,090 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Strategy Sells 1,690 Bitcoin to Fund STRC Preferred Stock Buyback Strategy sold 1,690 bitcoin between Aug. 3 and Aug. 9 at an average price of $64,262 per coin, generating $108.6 million in proceeds. The entire amount was used to repurchase STRC preferred stock, marking a balance sheet reshuffle rather than an exit from its bitcoin strategy. Following the sale, Strategy's bitcoin holdings dropped to 840,447 BTC. It

👍3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @Alex_Royce_BTC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 531,479 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

14 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

www.binance.comregistrable domain: binance.com20 posts · 31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
news.bitcoin.comregistrable domain: bitcoin.com5 posts · 2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
decrypt.co3 posts · 2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
www.theblock.coregistrable domain: theblock.co2 posts · 3 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
www.coindesk.comregistrable domain: coindesk.com1 post · 3 August 2026 – 3 August 2026 · example post
coinfomania.com1 post · 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
coinpedia.org1 post · 31 July 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post
cointelegraph.com1 post · 1 August 2026 – 1 August 2026 · example post
crypto.news1 post · 6 August 2026 – 6 August 2026 · example post
cryptonews.com1 post · 1 August 2026 – 1 August 2026 · example post
cryptoslate.com1 post · 1 August 2026 – 1 August 2026 · example post
dailycoin.com1 post · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
etherworld.co1 post · 3 August 2026 – 3 August 2026 · example post
www.thecoinrepublic.comregistrable domain: thecoinrepublic.com1 post · 2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex Royce in crypto” (@Alex_Royce_BTC), 1,189,514 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alex_Royce_BTC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.