Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال اِلِثیا Aletheia- فلسفه، دین، سیاست

Channel

کانال اِلِثیا Aletheia- فلسفه، دین، سیاست

@Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

278subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783784735
TypeChannel
Username@Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol

Growth

2762782776 August 2026 — 276 subscribers6 August 2026 — 276 subscribers15 August 2026 — 278 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:37278+2
6 Aug 2026, 23:31276no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:40276first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 278 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.3
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total633
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍457.1%
👎228.6%
114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 21:44 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

کتاب 'هرمنوتیک هایدگر و تفسیر اسلام' انتشارات بلومزبری

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

6 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC9 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔷برسد به دست موسی غنی‌نژاد! دکتر سیدجواد میری، جامعه‌شناس 👇👇👇👇👇👇

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC30 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔷گزارشی از سخنرانی پیرامون لیبرالیسم و آینده ایران هادی حکیم‌شفائی ✍دوست عزیز و فرهیخته، جناب ابوالفضل اصغرپور، در جلسه ارائه کتابی از فون هایک، به ارائه مبانی لیبرالیسم با خوانش فون هایک، پرداختند. مساله حق مالکیت، بازار آزاد، دور نگه‌ داشتن دولت از مداخله در بازار و مانند آن. پس از آن، ایشان عنوان کردند که راه حل اصلی برای ایران، برساخت یک لیبرالیسم میهن‌پرستانه ایرانی است که یک سوی آن، ایران به عنوان یک مفهوم وح

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC29 viewsread 6 August 2026

آقا هادی عزیز من نظرات خودم را در همان مقاله اول خدمت شما شرح دادم فکر نمی کنم نیازی به پاسخ مقاله دوم شما باشد. اما کوتاه اینکه من در صحبت خود درباره رابطه مدیر با زیر دستان به یک کتاب استناد نکردم، بلکه عرض کردم پایه تحصیلی من مدیریت بازرگانی است و اون حرف را از منابع تئوری های مدیریت عرض کردم. به علاوه از تجربه 34 سال سابقه در سازمان کار و رابطه بین مدیر و مرئوس ذکر کردم. و باز به علاوه نگفتم رضا پهلوی به زیردستا

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 19:56 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

درود بر شما. عرض کنم که صرف گفتن اینکه مردم ما با مردمان جاهای دیگه فرق دارند و شاه رو خدا می‌کنند کفایت نمیکنه. باید استدلال بشود و از شواهد تاریخی و جامعه‌شناسی هم استفاده شود. اتفاقا بر عکس نظر شما، تاریخ ایران نشان میدهد که بخش بزرگی از روشنفکران و روحانیان و مردم، از قضا برای مهار قدرت شاه، جنبش مشروطه به پا کردند؛ چه زمانی؟ بیش از یک قرن و نیم قبل! حالا چه شده بر این ملت که بخواهند شاه را خدا کنند؟! بخش بزرگی ا

👍31👎1

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026

مکاتبه جناب احمد فعال با اینجانب پیرامون پهلوی، پادشاهی‌خواهان و مخالفان آن👇👇👇👇

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC32 viewsread 6 August 2026

به نظر می‌رسد کلیشه سازی، ناسنجیدگی و ناروشمندی، ویژگی بخش بزرگی از جامعه روشنفکریِ ماست که رسانه‌زدگی، شتابزدگی و خشم ناشی از سرکوب مستمر، آن را اینچنین ساخته است. آری، باید عبور کرد؛ اما پیش از هر چیز، عبور از روشنفکریِ عوام‌زده‌ی خشم‌آلود! https://t.me/Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026

🔷 آری، باید عبور کرد! هادی حکیم‌ شفائی ✍چندی پیش در محل کتابخانه شهر، یکی از دوستان اهل کتاب را ملاقات کردم. این دوست عزیز نظر لطفی بر من کرد و به من گفت: "یک مشورت باهات دارم. اگر ممکنه یک کتاب خوب در مورد کودتای ۲۸ مرداد به من معرفی کن"! در پاسخ به این دوست گفتم: "راستش من بطور ویژه و تخصصی در زمینه این رویداد مطالعه نکرده‌ام. حیطه تخصصی من دین و فلسفه است و البته در سیاست هم موضوعِ گذار به دموکراسی. درباره رویدا

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC24 viewsread 6 August 2026

👇👇👇👇👇👇👇 🔷دیدگاه کانال الثیا: هر کسی، هر کسی که بطور مستقیم یا غیرمستقیم به شما بگوید فلان کتاب را نخوان یا فلان شبکه را تماشا نکن چون این کتاب یا شبکه فلان‌طور است یقین بدانید که با انگیزه‌های شخصی یا فراشخصی، شما را در جهت خلاف تفکر نقاد پیش بُرده و برای تحریف حقیقت، به پروپاگاندای معکوس متوسل شده است! ایشان تا چندی پیش، به عنوان یک شخصیت ضدپهلوی و ضدجنگ، از مهمانان برنامه‌های ایران‌اینترنشنال بوده و دعوت می‌شده

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

5 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bayane_azadiVideo

🔹چند ماهی است که نگاه کردن تلویزویون اینترنشنال را تحریم کرده ام، نه به این دلیل که این تلویزیون شبانه روز در کار شستشوی مغزی است، بلکه به این دلیل که تحمل چنین شبکه ای که رسما و علنا و با کمال بی شرمی به اتاق جنگ و تریبون رسمی اسرائیل و راست های افراطی تبدیل شده است، واقعا سخت بود. https://t.me/bayane_azadi

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

4 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC36 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

آیا میان اندیشه شریعتی و جمهوری اسلامی ربطی هست؟ دکتر سید جواد میری https://t.me/Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

4 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC29 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @sokhanranihaaFile

🔊فایل صوتی محمد جواد عتمادی اسارتِ آدمی و ماهیت دنیا . 🆔 @sokhanranihaa 🆔 @hozoormolana 🆑 #کانال‌سخنرانی‌ها 🌹

Signed Hadi Hakimshafaei

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 721,989 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال اِلِثیا Aletheia- فلسفه، دین، سیاست” (@Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol), 278 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aletheia_Phil_Rel_Pol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.