Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ADVINO - Agency Ad Accounts - Агентские рекламные аккаунты

@Advino_Agency

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

367subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286620910
TypeChannel
Username@Advino_Agency
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Advino_Agency

Growth

360367363.57 August 2026 — 361 subscribers7 August 2026 — 360 subscribers14 August 2026 — 367 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 359–368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:15367+7
7 Aug 2026, 23:23360-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:02361first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.3%
avg views ÷ 367 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 June 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,267
Reactions total69
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

228 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥5524.1%
👏3515.4%
😈2511.0%
👨‍💻177.46%
💯177.46%
👌167.02%
146.14%
👾146.14%
🔥125.26%
😎62.63%
🆒52.19%
🙏52.19%
👀41.75%
🦄31.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

How much have you already lost to “we’re looking into it”? Be honest. • Every hour spent in review is traffic you’ll never get back. • Every day without an account is volume someone else has already taken. • Every time your team had to fight bans instead of working, you paid for someone else’s infrastructure. These losses rarely appear in reports. But they often cost far more than the commission for reliable infra

👌2👨‍💻2💯2

4 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC87 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сколько ты уже потерял на "сейчас разберёмся"? Не на CPM. Не на креативах. Не на ставках. А на времени, когда команда не льёт. · Каждый час на ревью — это трафик, который не запустился. Каждый день без рабочего аккаунта — это объём, который забрал кто-то другой. Каждый раз, когда команда тушит технические проблемы вместо тестов и масштабирования, бизнес теряет темп. Эти потери редко попадают в отчёты. Но именно он

❤‍🔥2👏2💯2

31 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC145 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 StackAdapt DSP — go beyond classic native Launch Native, Display, Video, CTV, Audio, In-game and DOOH campaigns from one platform. 🌍 Global GEO coverage: USA, Canada, UK, Europe, LATAM, APAC and MENA. Premium inventory may include: Disney+ • Hulu • Peacock • Tubi • Paramount • NBC • CNN • HGTV • Discovery • A+E Networks • Pluto TV • Channel 4 • iHeartMedia For DOOH campaigns: JCDecaux • Clear Channel • OUTFRO

👏3👌2👨‍💻2

30 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC148 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Google account. €55K+ spend in July. Still alive. Sometimes the best sales pitch is just a screenshot 😏 We have Google agency solutions for different GEOs, budgets and verticals. If you need accounts built for real spend, not screenshots of empty dashboards — DM @Anastasiia_Advino 💜

😎4❤‍🔥3👏3🆒2👌1

27 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC232 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 BIGO Ads just got more interesting BIGO now provides access to additional MSN inventory in selected GEOs, expanding the available traffic within one platform. It’s not a separate MediaGo setup and the traffic cannot be selected exclusively, but it gives buyers more inventory, more testing opportunities and additional reach through BIGO. ADVINO works with BIGO under a direct contract, providing account access, on

👏4😈4❤‍🔥3👨‍💻2

20 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC305 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Топовые медиабайеры давно перестали делать всё сами. Пока одна команда ищет аккаунты, ждёт пополнения, пишет провайдерам и разбирается с техническими вопросами… Другая уже запускает новые тесты и масштабирует связки. В этом и разница. Сильные команды не тратят время на операционку. Они оставляют себе то, что действительно приносит деньги: ✔️ поиск новых гипотез; ✔️ креативы; ✔️ масштабирование. Всё остальное — дел

💯5👨‍💻3😈3

20 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC257 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The best media buyers don't waste time on operations. While one team is chasing new accounts, waiting for top-ups, pushing providers and dealing with support… Another one is already launching new tests and scaling winners. That's the difference. The strongest teams delegate everything that doesn't make money directly and focus on what actually matters: ✔️ testing new angles ✔️ building creatives ✔️ scaling profita

❤‍🔥7👌3👏3

10 Jul 2026, 10:21 UTC358 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 BIGO Ads is one of the most underrated traffic sources. While most advertisers are competing on Google and Meta, top media buying teams are already scaling with BIGO. Why? ✅ Perfect for both in-app and web campaigns. Supports a wide range of verticals, including: • iGaming • Betting • Crypto • Finance • E-commerce • Utilities • Dating • Sweepstakes …and many more. What makes it stand out? • Large volumes of h

4❤‍🔥4👾4

10 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC307 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔥 BIGO Ads — один из самых недооценённых источников трафика. Пока большинство конкурирует в Google и Meta, сильные команды уже масштабируются через BIGO. Почему? ✅ Подходит как для in-app, так и для web. Работает с такими вертикалями, как: • iGaming • Betting • Crypto • Finance • E-commerce • Utilities • Dating • Sweepstakes и многими другими. Что ещё важно: • Большой объём качественного трафика. • Более низкая

❤‍🔥6👏3👨‍💻3

2 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC336 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

AW Budapest 2026?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💯3

2 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC332 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Budapest, see you soon. 💜 The AdVino team is heading to Affiliate World Europe on July 9-10. Over the past few years, we've helped media buying teams scale through agency ad accounts across Google, Meta, TikTok, DV360, Taboola, Outbrain, Moloco, Xiaomi, Bigo, and 80+ traffic sources. If you're attending AW Europe and would like to discuss partnerships, traffic sources, agency accounts, or industry trends, we'd be

❤‍🔥5👏3😈3👀1😎1

30 Jun 2026, 19:33 UTC290 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔥 Q4 Doesn't Start in October. It Starts Now. Every September, the market suddenly remembers that Black Friday, Christmas, and the busiest season of the year are just around the corner. And it always starts the same way: — "We urgently need agency accounts." — "We need a new traffic source." — "We need more volume." — "We need another provider." The problem is... By then, it's already too late. High-quality age

👾54😈2👨‍💻1😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Advino_Agency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTCFinal Results22 voters

AW Budapest 2026?

  1. Yes73%
  2. No27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,207,408 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ADVINO - Agency Ad Accounts - Агентские рекламные аккаунты” (@Advino_Agency), 367 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Advino_Agency.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.