Channel
@ActiveFaithApologetics
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
238subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001440086667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ActiveFaithApologetics |
| Description | Theologie | Apologetik | Reformation | Geschichte | Eschatologie Christlicher Glaube im 21. Jahrhundert: Presbyterianisch und reformiert 💯 🔹 Ehemals: Jesus Christus - Die lebendige Hoffnung |
| Created | 15 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ActiveFaithApologetics |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @freiAuf/299313 Mar 2026, 15:20 UTC | @ActiveFaithApologetics/363 · this entry13 Mar 2026, 15:22 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @freiAuf/299513 Mar 2026, 15:33 UTC | @ActiveFaithApologetics/365 · this entry13 Mar 2026, 15:33 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @freiAuf | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 72 seconds | this entry (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 April 2025 to 1 June 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @ActiveFaithApologetics — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 238 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 238 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
126 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 68 | 54.0% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 18.3% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 17.5% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.794% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.794% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Der Endzeit-Hype, der dritte Tempel und ein folgenschwerer Irrtum 📜 „Vielleicht kennen Sie diese Szenerie aus christlichen Buchläden, Predigtreihen oder YouTube-Kanälen: aufwendig gestaltete Zeitleisten, die den Ablauf der Endzeit bis ins kleinste Detail durchdeklinieren. Hochrechnungen über geopolitische Ereignisse im Nahen Osten. Und vor allem eine tiefe, fast schon obsessive Faszination für die Frage, wann in Jer…
❤4👍3
Der moderne Staat Israel ist NICHT kontinuierlich, äquivalent oder identisch mit dem antiken Israel der Bibel. Die Behauptung, Gottes Verheißung an Abrahams Nachkommen sei erst 1948 erfüllt worden, widerspricht der Schrift direkt. Die Bibel sagt, dass Gott dieses Versprechen bereits gehalten hat: ▪️„So gab der HERR Israel das ganze Land, das er ihren Vätern zu geben geschworen hatte... Kein einziges Wort von all den…
👍9👏3🙏2❤1🔥1
Offenbarung 20,1-15 • Das tausendjährige Reich - Gestern, heute und in Zukunft Predigt von Pastor Sebastian Heck - ,,Das tausendjährige Reich - Gestern, heute und in Zukunft" (Offb 20,1-15) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS4coly9458 @ActiveFaithApologetics ⚔️
„Das Volk Israel – der Zeiger an Gottes Weltenuhr“? Diese Metapher klingt fromm. Aber sie steht in direktem Widerspruch zur Schrift. 📖 Paulus schreibt in Römer 9,6: „Nicht alle, die von Israel abstammen, sind Israel.“ Der Zeiger an Gottes Heilsuhr ist nicht ein Nationalstaat. Der Zeiger ist Christus. Er ist es, der die Zeit erfüllt hat (Gal 4,4). Er ist es, in dem alle Verheißungen sind (2Kor 1,20). Wer stattdessen…
👍2
Active Faith Apologetics ⚔️ pinned «Konfessionell reformierte und bibeltreue Gemeinden in Deutschland. (Stand 14.03.26) Eine Übersicht für alle, die eine schriftgebundene, reformierte Gemeinde suchen – außerhalb von EKD-Landeskirchen und liberalen Strukturen. Berlin • International Reformed…»
Konfessionell reformierte und bibeltreue Gemeinden in Deutschland. (Stand 14.03.26) Eine Übersicht für alle, die eine schriftgebundene, reformierte Gemeinde suchen – außerhalb von EKD-Landeskirchen und liberalen Strukturen. Berlin • International Reformed Evangelical Church Berlin - irec-berlin.de • Presbyterianische Gemeinde Berlin - epkd.de Frankfurt • Frankfurt Presbyterian Church - frankfurtpres.org Freiburg i…
❤2
Eschatologische Politik am Abgrund der Vernunft Sehr lesenswerter Text. Der Artikel zeigt, dass christlicher Zionismus nicht nur ein politisches Problem ist, sondern schon theologisch auf einem Grundfehler beruht. Der Autor beschreibt ihn als Verwechslung von heilsgeschichtlichem Israel mit dem modernen Staat Israel und damit als Kategorienfehler aus reformiert-bundestheologischer Sicht. Besonders stark ist, dass de…
❤2
Was man aus biblischer Sicht ergänzen müsste: Mueller beschreibt die politische Pathologie des christlichen Zionismus. Die theologische Wurzel bleibt unberührt. Kein Bibelvers, keine Exegese. Dabei liegt das Problem tiefer: Dispensationalismus liest Röm 11 als ethnische Garantie statt als Glaubensgemeinschaft. Er überträgt Landverheißungen direkt auf einen säkularen Nationalstaat, ohne den hermeneutischen Filter de…
Die geopolitische Rolle des christlichen Zionismus in den Vereinigten Staaten Der christliche Zionismus ist keine Randerscheinung, sondern ein struktureller Machtfaktor in der amerikanischen Außenpolitik. Organisationen wie „Christians United for Israel“ betreiben professionelle Lobbyarbeit, mobilisieren Millionen evangelikaler Wähler und erzeugen eine Rückkoppelung zwischen religiöser Überzeugung und politischer Ent…
Christus und sein Leib, die Kirche, sind das wahre Israel. Darum ist es nicht die Aufgabe der Gläubigen, eine Christus ablehnende Nation im Nahen Osten zu segnen, sondern Christus und sein Volk. Quelle: Relearn @HiddenFactsOfficial 🦁🔎
❤5🙏3👏1
Erich von Däniken ist verstorben. Er prägte Generationen mit der These, dass nicht Gott, sondern „außerirdische Wesen“ Ursprung von Religion, Kultur und biblischen Berichten seien. 👽 Seine Bücher wirkten umdeutend: Die Bibel wurde nicht verworfen, sondern entkernt. Wunder wurden zu Technologie, Offenbarung zu Missverständnis, Gott zu einem Platzhalter für „höhere Intelligenzen“. Biblisch betrachtet ist das kein har…
👍7❤2
Jesus war nicht nur Mensch – er ist es bis heute Man hört auch unter Christen manchmal: „Jesus war Mensch.“ Die Bibel ist präziser: Jesus ist und bleibt Mensch – und zugleich wahrer Gott. Jesus Christus ist eine Person mit zwei Naturen: wahrer Mensch und wahrer Gott (Joh 1,1.14; Kol 2,9). Nach seiner Auferstehung sagt er: „Ein Geist hat nicht Fleisch und Knochen, wie ihr seht, dass ich sie habe.“ (Lk 24,39) Und Pa…
❤4🕊1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ActiveFaithApologetics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 397,707 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Active Faith Apologetics ⚔️” (@ActiveFaithApologetics), 238 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ActiveFaithApologetics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.