4 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,196–2,197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:06
2,196
-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:50
2,197
+1
7 Aug 2026, 20:18
2,196
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:57
2,196
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,891 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,961
50.4%
❤🔥
899
23.1%
🔥
420
10.8%
💘
189
4.86%
💅
128
3.29%
🥰
89
2.29%
🍓
82
2.11%
☃
47
1.21%
😈
42
1.08%
💋
34
0.874%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,891reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 30 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 18 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
24
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @asamimirayy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 January 2026 to 30 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Боль меня как художника:
Начало каждого 3-го рисовательского видео в ТТ:
- Вот 5 причин почему вам стоит удалить procreate и начать рисовать в клипстудио/крита/фотошоп/и тд по списку.
Я:🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
ЧЕСТНО, не хватает слов как меня достал этот хайп или кликбейты в сторону несчастного прокриейта. Причем в видео зачастую сравнивают несравниваемое. Тип вот в прокриейте этого нет, зато есть вон там🙄🙄. И ничего, что он стои…
НОВЫЕ ГЛАВЫ‼️ (написано уже 36 страниц😅)
ГЛАВА 3 "Письмо хуа чена неудачное литературное клише или же диагноз"- моя самое первое эссе рассуждение, которое я решила добавить из телетайпа в сборник.
ГЛАВА 6 "Сравнение Му Цина и Безликого Бая" - здесь удалось уйти в более подробный анализ самого Му Цина и его прошлого.
На некоторое время писание эссе откладывается по техническим причинам.
Буду очень рада вашим ком…
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Следующую главу хочу в коем то веке посвятить Му Цину. О нем также просили в комментариях. И у меня есть несколько тем/ заголовков, которые я хочу реализовать, но не все сразу. С какой бы начать?
1.Сяньлэ трио - общая характеристика взаимоотношений между героями. (Здесь я думаю расписать откуда растут ноги в их недопониманиях)
2. Му Цин и изгнание маленького Хуа Чена из армии. Милость или подлость?
3. Реакция Му …
Вот и подоспела вторая глава☺️.
Важное примечание:
дочитайте ее до конца, прежде чем писать свое мнение🙏, ибо всю картину своего мировозрения я собирала пазлами, так, что бы одна глава дополняла другую, а не сразу раскрывала все карты на стол в одном конкретном месте.
Мои чувства после этой главы:
😅Well, это мое третье эссе на тему анализа небожителей и пока я писала 2ую главу мне казалось, что я пытаюсь сравнить…
Уже во всю пишется второя глава, заголовок которой немного проспойлерю👉👈😁
Хочу услышать ваши предложение какие спорные/неспорные темы вы хотели бы обсудить?
С удовольсвтвием выберу несколько ваших предложений💗
Мое мини эссе на выше упомянутую тематику (файлик пдф ниже). Буду рада подискутировать с вами на эту достаточно спорную тему в комментариях и услышать ваше мнение.
Вообще главный повод написания данного эссе послужили бесчисленные коментарии посвященные бифлифам, с которыми, во многом, я не была согласна или частично не согласна.
Повелитель ветров один из моих самых первых и любимых персонажей в бн, который мне так…
Из новостей обо мне:
Я очень много арбайтен в последнее время, в основном что бы получить очередное продвижение по карьере. И пропадаю, потому что рисую исключительно по выходным. И то, если на выходной ничего не запланируется из домашних дел. Но я здорова, менталка в порядке. Готовлю для вас интересное рассуждение о довольно спрорной теме по бифлифам, и постепенно планирую писать свои эссе-рассуждения не только по …
Разница между новой и старой версией Хэ Сюаня в golden ver.
Хехехехехех
Между ними пол года разницы😁сентябрь/апрель
Пс: Ногти грызть он любит, до крови, что я могу еще сказать😆
❤261💅64😈42
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @asamimirayy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 30 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,290,355 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asami.Miray” (@asamimirayy), 2,196 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asamimirayy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
