2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 02:05
75
no change
11 Aug 2026, 14:45
75
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
91.1%
avg views ÷ 75 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.3
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
20 (26 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
1,367
Reactions total
63
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
63.5%
👍
7
11.1%
🔥
7
11.1%
💔
4
6.35%
😭
3
4.76%
🤔
2
3.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
امروز درحالی که توقع و استرس عتاب داشتم تحسین شدم و این تحسین احتمالا هفتهی بعدم را هم بسازد. همین تحسین باعث شد شباهنگام چنان شاهکاری خلق کنم که احتمالا از صدقهسر بیلیاقتی استاد حیفوهدر میشود. من راضیام. فقط امیدوارم عروس تعریفی رقصنابلد نشوم.
طیف ||
۱۴۰۵/۰۵/۱۸
سعید.
لاک پیامبرِ آن مذهب لیبرالیسمی است که از خودِ محافظهکاری نیز محافظهکارتر است؛ لیبرالیسمی که ویژگیاش حساسیتی شوم و ویرانگر نسبت به ورود هر امر نو است؛ لیبرالیسمی که از حدود خود مطمئن است و از هرگونه افراط هراس دارد و دست فلجکنندهی آبرومندی و احتراممآبی را بر هر آنچه خطرناک و انقلابی است میگذارد...
بهنقل از مایکل اوکشات
📚 طیف؛ حرکت از راست به چپ
👤 پری اندرسون
امروز به دایرهی دوستانم فکر کردم؛ اسامی ردیف شدند و هرکدام به شناسندهای غیر از اسمهایشان وصل شدند و من دلم برای همهشان تنگ شد.
قبلترها مرز مشخصی برای روابطم داشتم، آدمها در سطوح مختلفی ردهبندی میشدند و به نسبت ردهبندیشان با ایشان تعامل میکردم اما امروز ناگهانی دلم خواست به یک آشنا سر بزنم و بیهوا سر از روبروی دانشگاه درآوردم؛ فهمیدم که او هم دلش میخواسته امروز به من سر بزند اما آدرس دیدار را نداشته... آد…
تمام روز را به یک رابطه فکر میکردم، اینکه انسان ذاتا شرور نمیتواند بدنبال کسب خیر در جهان باشد و همین ثابت میکند که مذائم و مظالم حتی در غریبترین رابطهها هم مسری و ویروسی خواهد بود؛ روحیاتی مثل حماقت، دگمبودن و روحیهای که رئیس روحیهی کارمندی مینامد-یک انسان مکانیزه.
حالا فکر میکنم اینکه سخت مینویسم و احساس میکنم زمان پراضطراب روزمرهای را میگذرانم از همزیستی با چنین آدمهاییست. باید فکری کنم و الا به چی…
امروز فهمیدم بدنم پیر و فرتوت و تاحدی زمینگیر شدهاست؛ گویا دیگر از آن چابکی و تروفرزی عجیبی که در من دیده میشده چیزی باقی نمانده. باخودم فکر میکنم چرا و طبق معمول لیستی بینهایت از عوامل را ردیف میکنم پیشچشمانم.
در نهایت سه عامل بیشاز همه خود را برجسته مینمودند که دوتایش برآمده از روزگار پرتنشِ مضطرب اینروزهایم و انتخابهای multitaskام است و یکی در دست تعمیر.
از آنجا که ایدهها قدیماند و من هم یک ایدهام ه…
دربارهی ترجمه:
آغاز سرود دوم «دوزخ» یکی از گرهگاههای مهم کمدی الهی است: دانته، پیش از ورود واقعی به سفر، دچار تردید میشود و از ویرژیل میپرسد که آیا برای چنین سفری شایستگی دارد یا نه. این بند همچنین آغازگر یکی از سنتهای ادبی کهن، یعنی «فراخوانی الههها» (invocatio) است که دانته آن را با ظرافتی خاص از حماسههای کلاسیک وام گرفته و به قالب مسیحی خود درآورده است. بررسی سه ترجمهی فارسیِ این بند -از شجاعالدین شفا،…
روز به پایان میرسد و تاریکی فضا اندکاندک خاکنشینان را از خستگی میرهاند و من یکهوتنها خود را آمادهی آن میکردم که هم با درازی راه بستیزم و هم با حس ترحم و اینک خاطرهی خطاناپذیر، زبان بوصف آنچه درین راه دیدم خواهد گشود.
ای فرشتگان الهامبخش، ای نبوغ بلندپایه، اکنون به کمک من آیید و تو، ای خاطره که آنچه را که دیدهام بر صفحهی کاغذ آوردی، وقت است که هنرنمایی کنی.
چنین آغاز کردم: ای شاعری که راهنمای منی، به توانا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Abgrund_qoute. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,275,039 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abgrund” (@Abgrund_qoute), 75 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abgrund_qoute.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.