Channel
@AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,448subscribers
+3,228 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002238212002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:46 | 24,448 | +8 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:16 | 24,440 | +1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:45 | 24,439 | -2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 24,441 | -6 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 23:49 | 24,447 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:26 | 24,456 | +2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 24,454 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:06 | 24,457 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 24,454 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 24,462 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 24,463 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:50 | 24,467 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:01 | 24,470 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 24,471 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 24,468 | -4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 24,472 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 24,473 | +17 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 24,456 | +65 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 24,391 | +29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 24,362 | first reading |
713 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 151 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 147 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 713 (2 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 223,684 |
| Reactions total | 43 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 04:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 80 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 56 | 43.4% | |
| 💯 | 32 | 24.8% | |
| 👌 | 14 | 10.9% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 9.30% | |
| 🫡 | 10 | 7.75% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 3.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 713 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 713 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 19 of 175 posts held from the last 30 days (10.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
بناء على التقارير الواردة من المركز الوطني للأرصاد، وحرصًا على سلامة الجميع، تقرر تحويل الدراسة الحضورية إلى الدراسة عن بُعد ليوم غد الإثنين 29 جمادى الأولى 1448هـ، عبر #منصة_مدرستي والمنصات التعليمية المعتمدة، لجميع الطلاب والطالبات، ومنسوبي ومنسوبات المدارس من الهيئتين التعليمية والإدارية في محافظات (الزلفي وشقراء والمجمعة والغاط).
قناة أ . عبدالرحمن الزهراني pinned «🚀 هل تبحث عن إدارة مدرسية أكثر تنظيمًا واحترافية؟ لم تعد القيادة المدرسية تقتصر على متابعة المهام وإنجاز التقارير، بل أصبحت تحتاج إلى أدوات ذكية تساعدك على التخطيط، وتحليل الأداء، وقياس الأثر، واتخاذ القرارات بثقة. هنا تأتي منصة القيادة المدرسية (قيادة)…»
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🚀 هل تبحث عن إدارة مدرسية أكثر تنظيمًا واحترافية؟ لم تعد القيادة المدرسية تقتصر على متابعة المهام وإنجاز التقارير، بل أصبحت تحتاج إلى أدوات ذكية تساعدك على التخطيط، وتحليل الأداء، وقياس الأثر، واتخاذ القرارات بثقة. هنا تأتي منصة القيادة المدرسية (قيادة) لتجمع أعمال مدرستك في مكان واحد، وتضع بين يديك منظومة متكاملة من الأدوات التي تدعم عملك القيادي. ✨ ماذا تقدم لك منصة قيادة؟ 1️⃣ تحليل نتائج التقويم الذاتي والخارج…
📍اثناء التسجيل في الروضة الافتراضية : في حال لم يظهر الطفل في القائمة اتبع الخطوات التالية:
انتهت مرحلة المفاضلة الأولية، وأُعلنت نتائج الترشيح الأولي لبرنامج #الماجستير_المهني_في_التدريس . ينتقل المرشحون إلى المرحلة الثانية، والتي تشمل الاختبار والتقييم. نشكر جميع المتقدمين، ونتمنى لهم التوفيق. #برنامج_تنمية_القدرات_البشرية
تم الاعلان عن نتائج ترشيح المقابلات الشخصية للمقدمين والمقدمات في برنامج #الماجستير_المهني_في_التدريس في الموقع الرسمي ،،
مبادرة الفهم القرائي
👌1
📍المتبقي من إجازات العام الدراسي 1448هـ ،، لا أحلل حذف الاسم أخوكم/عبدالرحمن الزهراني،، ،،
👍1
Posted without readable text
📍الاسئلة الشائعة لإدارة الاداء الوظيفي للكادر الإداري ،،
Showing the 12 most recent of 713 posts we hold for @AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 62 posts on @AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة أ . عبدالرحمن الزهراني” (@AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani), 24,448 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbdulrahmanAL_zahrani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.