2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 13:32
92
no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:36
92
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
84.8%
avg views ÷ 92 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
18 (3 June 2026 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
78
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Links
7
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
3
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
همراهان ارزشمند رویداد AUT Think
سلام
سپاس از همراهی شما دوستان
طرح های ارسالی وارد مرحله داوری شده اند.
پس از انجام داوری ها، نتایج از طریق سایت، کانالها و پیامک به همه شرکت کنندگان اعلام خواهد شد.
در برخی محورها تعدادی از برگزیدگان دعوت به مصاحبه حضوری یا آنلاین خواهند شد تا جزییات بیشتری از ایده خود را بیان کنند که با آنها تماس گرفته میشود.
از صبوری شما تا اعلام نتایج داوری سپاسگزارم.
❇️ همچین لازم به ذکر است،…
✳️
سلام مجدد دوستان و همراهان گرامی
مطلع باشید که تایید دریافت فایل اپلود شده شما در تایم اداری، بررسی شده و اگر فایل دریافتی قابل قبول بود، تایید دریافت در اکانت شما ثبت میگردد.
اغلب دوستانی که پیگیری می کنید را بررسی اولیه نمودیم و فایل ها به درستی دریافت شده اند.
خواهشمند است جهت اطمینان از صحت اپلود فایل خود، فردا شب پروفایل خود را بررسی نمایید.
با سپاس از همراهی شما🙏
✳️
سلام دوستان و همراهان رویداد
امروز به دلیل آپدیت های زیرساختی سرور، سایت کند بوده و ممکن است گاها دسترسی نداشته باشید.
به همین خاطر تا فردا امکان آپلود در سایت فراهم است.
با سپاس از صبوری شما🙏
سلام دوستان
ضمن سپاس از همراهی شما عزیزان
فرم تعریف ایده/طرح پیشنهادی در دومین رویداد AUT THINK که پس از ثبت نام اولیه، در ثبت نام تکمیلی در اکانت خود مشاهده می نمایید.
در ثبت نام تکمیلی بایستی این فرم را پر کرده و اپلود نمایید.
نیازی به ارسال پروپوزال مجزا نیست.
سپاس از همراهی شما 🙏
سلام دوستان
اگر در ثبت نام دچار مشکل شده بودید، اکنون مشکل حل شده است و می توانید ثبت نام خود را انجام دهید.
پس از ثبت نام اولیه و ورود به اکانت خود، فایل جزییات هر یک از محور ها قابل دسترس خواهد بود (که در این کانال هم در اختیار شما عزیزان است).
سپس می توانید فرم مربوط به مشخصات ایده و طرح خود را دانلود و سپس تکمیل و آپلود کنید.
سپاس از همراهی شما 🙏
جزئیات موضوعات اولویت دار صنایع را در اینجا بخوانید.
محور اول: راهکارهای زودبازده و مدیریت هوشمند بحران، امداد و تابآوری (شهری و محیطزیست)
محور دوم: زیرساختهای هوشمند، مقاومسازی و توسعه پایدار
محور سوم: امنیت سایبری و حفاظت از زیرساختهای حیاتی
محور چهارم: فناوریهای لبهدانش، رباتیک و کاربردهای نوین
محور پنجم: تجهیزات پزشکی
توضیحات تکمیلی را پس از ثبت نام در سایت مشاهده خواهید کرد.
❇️ قابل توجه دانشجویان تمامی رشته ها
تا 600 میلیون تومان گرنت پژوهشی تا رسیدن به نمونه اولیه
❇️ محور اول: راهکارهای زودبازده و مدیریت هوشمند بحران، امداد و تابآوری (شهری و محیطزیست)
❇️ محور دوم: زیرساختهای هوشمند، مقاومسازی و توسعه پایدار
❇️ محور سوم: امنیت سایبری و حفاظت از زیرساختهای حیاتی
❇️ محور چهارم: فناوریهای لبهدانش، رباتیک و کاربردهای نوین
✨✨دریافت طرح ها تا 18 تیر 1405 تمدید شد!✨✨
دبیرخانه اج…
❇️ قابل توجه دانشجویان تمامی رشته ها
تا 300 میلیون تومان گرنت پژوهشی تا رسیدن به نمونه اولیه
❇️ محور ششم:
🔹روشهای فروش مبتنی بر نیچ مارکتینگ جهت قشر متوسط جامعه در پلتفرم طلا و نقره توکنیکو
🔹 تولید انواع NFT مبتنی بر ارزش افزوده شمش پلمپ شده طلا و نقره
✨✨دریافت طرح ها تا 18 تیر 1405 تمدید شد!✨✨
دبیرخانه اجرایی دومین رویداد AUT THINK
آدرس: تهران-خیابان حافظ-دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر-اداره انجمن های علمی دانشجویی
📞…
محور پنجم:
❇️ سامانه هوشمند پایش و مدیریت یکپارچه تجهیزات و زیرساختهای حیاتی پزشکی
این پروژه با هدف طراحی، توسعه و تجاریسازی یک پلتفرم پیشرفته تحت وب جهت مدیریت متمرکز تجهیزات پزشکی و زیرساختهای گازهای طبی بیمارستانی تعریف شده است. این سامانه به عنوان یک محصول در کلاس سازمانی (Enterprise-Grade)، با تمرکز ویژه بر پایداری عملیاتی، و پردازشهای حیاتی با امنیت بالا، جهت عرضه به بازار تجهیزات پزشکی کشور توسعه مییابد…
❇️ قابل توجه دانشجویان رشته های مهندسی کامپیوتر، مهندسی پزشکی، علوم کامپیوتر، مهندسی برق، مهندسی صنایع و دیگر علاقه مندان این حوزه (امتیاز ویژه برای تیم های با ترکیب رشته های مختلف)
تا 5 میلیارد تومان گرنت پژوهشی تا رسیدن به نمونه اولیه
محور پنجم: سامانه هوشمند پایش و مدیریت یکپارچه تجهیزات و زیرساختهای حیاتی پزشکی
حامیان این محور: هلدینگ رئوف تجهیز و شرکت نورآفرین خلاق
دریافت طرح ها تا 18 تیر 1405 تمدید شد!
دبی…
حامیان رویداد تاکنون:
- ✨مجموعه دانشگستران
- ✨هلدینگ رئوف تجهیز
- ✨شرکت نورآفرین خلاق
- ✨شرکت فناوران ساویس مرجان
- شرکت های بیشتری با موضوعات دیگر نیز به زودی به ما می پیوندند.
همراه رویداد:
پارک علم و فناوری دانشگاه صنعتی امیرکبیر
آدرس سایت رویداد: https://saoaut.aut.ac.ir/aut-think/
#اداره_انجمنهای_علمی_دانشجویی
#معاونت_فرهنگی_دانشجویی
#دانشگاه_صنعتی_امیرکبیر
#دانشگاه_پلی_تکنیک_تهران
تلگرام اینستاگرام …
دومین رویداد ایده پردازی مسئله محور AUT Think pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AUT_Think. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 41,556 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AUT_Think named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@admin_sao named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دومین رویداد ایده پردازی مسئله محور AUT Think” (@AUT_Think), 92 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AUT_Think.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.