Channel
@ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001032975208 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP |
| Description | 直接從原頻道（ https://telegram.me/ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP ）搬過來重新更新 |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 6 July 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 120 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 120 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2016 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2018. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
共畜黨總是這麼對付民眾，僞軍對大規模民眾起義進行屠殺，武警部隊對付中等規模起義，警察城管專門鎮壓小團體，幾個共畜一起暴揍一個男性平民，雄性共畜暴打女性平民，雌性共畜就揍民眾的孩子，連共畜小雜種也欺負民眾更為年幼的孩子，那麼民眾為什麼不學習田忌賽馬戰術呢，女性平民去殺共畜小雜種，避免自己孩子被欺壓，男性平民去宰殺雌性共畜，小團體去對付落單共畜，大團體碾壓共畜城管和僞警。不用擔心僞軍反撲，做完前幾種報復性行動，僞軍根本集結不起來。
http://telegra.ph/%E7%94%B7%E5%84%BF%E5%BD%93%E6%9D%80%E4%BA%BA-08-21
http://telegra.ph/%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD%E4%B8%9A%E5%8A%A1%E7%B4%A0%E8%B4%A8%E4%BA%8C%E7%BA%8C-08-23
http://telegra.ph/%E8%B5%B7%E4%B9%89%E8%B7%AF%E7%BA%BF-08-21
http://telegra.ph/%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD%E4%B8%9A%E5%8A%A1%E7%B4%A0%E8%B4%A8%E4%B8%89-08-20
http://telegra.ph/%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD%E4%B8%9A%E5%8A%A1%E7%B4%A0%E8%B4%A8%E4%BA%8C-08-20
http://telegra.ph/%E9%9D%A9%E5%91%BD%E4%B8%9A%E5%8A%A1%E7%B4%A0%E8%B4%A8-08-20
http://telegra.ph/%E6%89%93%E5%87%BB%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E5%9F%BA%E5%B1%82%E5%B9%B2%E9%83%A8%E6%98%AF%E7%93%A6%E8%A7%A3%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E4%B8%93%E5%88%B6%E7%9A%84%E7%89%B9%E6%95%88%E5%8A%9E%E6%B3%95-05-30
槍械結構
黃俄國寶培訓教材，希望廣大反共志士加以研讀，反制黃俄
http://x.80529.x6.nabble.com/
Channel name was changed to «師共長技以滅共»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 280,597 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“師共長技以滅共” (@ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP), 120 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANTICCPVIALEARNINGCCP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.