Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 師共長技以制共

Channel

師共長技以制共

@ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

164subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001026743560
TypeChannel
Username@ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP
Description(1)傳播盤古樂隊作品 (2)傳遞盤古革命軍價值觀 (3)師共長技以制共
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP

Growth

163164163.56 August 2026 — 163 subscribers6 August 2026 — 164 subscribers8 August 2026 — 164 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 163–164 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:16164no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:10164+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:07163first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 May 2016the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2017. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Links
86

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

31 May 2017, 05:28 UTC≈7,320 viewsread 8 August 2026

淪陷區苦難同胞們,你們是否支持殺掉所有共畜黨員爲死去的近億平民抵命 anonymous poll 支持 – 388 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 65% 反對 – 210 👍👍👍👍 35% 👥 598 people voted so far.

31 May 2017, 03:04 UTC≈8,450 viewsread 8 August 2026

如何偵破匪諜?|諸夏 問:有沒有甄別匪諜的廉價七成正確方法?比如,您是怎樣做出鉛筆社是我匪用來統戰經濟自由主義者的匪諜這一英明判斷的? 阿姨:假如我是匪諜,我會怎么做呢?每個人都有他想要的東西,每個人都有他害怕的東西。你如果是一個合格的匪諜的話,你就必然有一個比較專業的統戰對象或者打擊對象,那樣你就要設身處地的深入這個對象的生態環境去,把自己假想成為他,想他喜歡什么,想他害怕什么,明白這一點以后,你就知道你該做什么了。要明白一個人喜歡什么或者不喜歡什么,比我們大家想象的要容易得多。每個人都生活在自我的泡沫中,以為只有自己才了解自己,其實呢,你用不著什么非常先進的軟件或者統計技術,只消問一下不會超過五十個問題,大體上來講,一個人的傾向性、他的隱秘欲望和隱秘恐懼,至少可以弄清七八成。涉及政治或者公共問題,恐怕連五十個問題都用不到。一般來說,涉及公共問題,十個問題就足夠了。人比較隱秘的地方是他的私生活方面,外人不容易窺測;但如果要在公

15 May 2017, 14:30 UTC≈33,900 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

黃俄國寶培訓教材,希望廣大反共志士加以研讀,反制黃俄

9 May 2017, 07:53 UTC≈3,940 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://medium.com/@LiuZhongjing/%E7%B0%A1%E6%98%8E%E7%B5%B1%E6%88%B0%E5%AD%B8%E6%95%99%E7%A8%8B-8b871f5a4861

18 Jan 2017, 04:02 UTC≈3,860 viewsread 8 August 2026

舍生取義,殺身成仁,壯士義舉 ,革命先聲。 2006年04月27日,偽都北平市豐臺共畜偽林業局副局長黃朝明夫婦別墅內被砍死; 2009年 5月10日,鄧玉嬌在賓館自衛,刺死、刺傷湖北省野三關鎮偽政府職員; 2009年 5月16日,夏俊峰在勤務室被毆打,殺死兩名共畜爪牙城管隊員; 2009年 5月27日,山東東明縣農機中心主任徐富強在辦公室被斬殺; 2009年06月02日,廣東惠州龍門旅游區管委會副主任鄧開華強拆民房被砍死 2009年 7月 1日,河南泌陽縣偽城建局局長被義士活捉后被滅殺; 2006年12月11日,甘肅臨夏中級共畜偽法院刑庭偽庭長陳義明被勇士滅殺全家 2011年 6月23日,壯士吳學文抵抗200多人的拆遷隊伍,殺死兩共畜官員; 2011年 6月25日,山西朔州拆遷期間一偽住房建設局共畜官員被滅殺; 2011年 8月24日,山東沾化偽公安局副局長被義士宋建峰殺死; 2012年 2月18日,山西省大同市偽副市長王偉國

20 Dec 2016, 09:57 UTC711 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @wumaoOfYellowRussiansPhoto

變異黃俄五毛新特徵

27 Oct 2016, 12:46 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 8 August 2026

你是否認同以武力消滅黃俄? anonymous poll 認同 – 289 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 82% 不認同 – 62 👍👍 18% 👥 351 people voted so far.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 288,777 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“師共長技以制共” (@ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP), 164 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANTICCPVIAKILLSOFCCP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.