Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Anne Marie Waters News

Channel

Anne Marie Waters News

@AMWnews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

804subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001463044089
TypeChannel
Username@AMWnews
Created6 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AMWnews

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

804825814.56 August 2026 — 825 subscribers6 August 2026 — 825 subscribers13 August 2026 — 821 subscribers19 August 2026 — 819 subscribers26 August 2026 — 812 subscribers3 September 2026 — 807 subscribers12 September 2026 — 806 subscribers25 September 2026 — 804 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 50 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 801–828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:00804-2
12 Sept 2026, 08:36806-1
3 Sept 2026, 15:59807-5
26 Aug 2026, 11:13812-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:08819-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:18821-4
6 Aug 2026, 15:18825no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:03825first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

128 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7256.3%
❤4132.0%
🔥1310.2%
👏10.781%
😁10.781%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 August 2025 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Feb 2026, 16:15 UTC604 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Airstrip1news

Keir Starmer addresses allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor: 'No one is above the law' Andrew has consistently and strenuously denied any wrongdoing amid the ongoing allegations. Just hours after the Prime Minster's comments Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, Thames Valley Police have confirmed. https://www.gbnews.com/royal/keir-starmer-andrew-mountbatten…

18 Feb 2026, 14:35 UTC389 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Airstrip1newsPhoto

Rupert Lowe MP I see there's a piece in the Telegraph today attacking Restore Britain for our halal slaughter ban. Usual lines, usual insults. Don't care. I really want to be clear here. For too long, these debates have been suppressed because people are afraid of being called unpleasant names. I am entirely uninterested in all of that. Restore Britain is going to tell the truth. Halal and kosher slaughter is …

👍24❤4

13 Feb 2026, 11:07 UTC490 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥13👍6👏1

5 Dec 2025, 00:51 UTC801 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

A fight has broken out in America’s Lone Star State and popularised the phrase “the Islamisation of Texas.” Although Muslims are only a tiny minority (approximately 2%), tensions are high and Republican Governor Greg Abbott has effectively declared war. At the epicentre of this battle is the so-called EPIC City - a housing project established near Dallas and intended exclusively for Muslims. “In two instances, benef…

❤10👍1

17 Sept 2025, 20:40 UTC343 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Let's talk about free speech Without free speech, you do not have a democracy The subject is obviously in the news because of Charly Kirk's assassination. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp1I0NzFJX4

👍4

17 Sept 2025, 20:40 UTC787 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Let's talk about free speech Without free speech, you do not have a democracy The subject is obviously in the news because of Charly Kirk's assassination. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp1I0NzFJX4

17 Sept 2025, 20:28 UTC442 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Airstrip1news

Let's talk about free speech For anyone who prefers an alternative to YouTube, there is a link to @AMDWaters Substack in the description. https://rumble.com/v6z3fm6-lets-talk-about-free-speech.html

😁1

17 Sept 2025, 20:17 UTC543 viewsread 6 August 2026

Let's talk about free speech https://substack.com/@amwuk Anne Marie spent over two decades at the heart of British politics - first on the left, then fiercely fighting against it. She is the author of two books: 'Beyond Terror - Islam's Slow Erosion of Western Democracy' and 'In Defense of Democracy.'

17 Sept 2025, 20:09 UTC447 viewsread 6 August 2026

Let's talk about free speech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp1I0NzFJX4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AMWnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Anne Marie Waters News” (@AMWnews), 804 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMWnews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.