Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ALPHARD HUNTER ETH

@ALPHARDHUNTER

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

433subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001830631693
TypeChannel
Username@ALPHARDHUNTER
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ALPHARDHUNTER

Growth

433434433.57 Aug 2026, 10:15 — 434 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 05:17 — 434 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:51 — 433 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:158 Aug 2026, 09:51
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 433–434 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:51433-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:17434no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:15434first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.78%
avg views ÷ 433 subscribers
Avg views / post
38.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 March 202630 July 2026)
Views total190
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
375.0%
❤‍🔥125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

🇬🇧 ENG 🎁 Xstake — Telegram Case Opening Game Open cases using Telegram Stars and spin the wheel to win valuable gifts! 🎲 Rare gifts like Durov's Cap 🎁, Swiss Watch 🎁 and more can be yours — worth more than the case itself. 💡 Please note: – Stars on the app balance are non-refundable 🚀 Ready to test your luck? Play Xstake! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇷🇺 RU 🎁 Xstake — игра с открытием кейсов в Telegram Открывай кейсы за

Signed FourtisBot

26 Jul 2026, 12:22 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 📟 NEW: Multi Group Leaderboards

26 Jul 2026, 09:59 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 📟 NEW: Introducing Rick Hub

26 Jul 2026, 05:25 UTC47 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 💭 NEW: Introducing comments

24 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC54 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Phanes_botPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

6 Jun 2026, 03:14 UTC130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot 💭 NEW: Introducing community /thesis and /comment

5 Jun 2026, 12:30 UTC127 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wow, GARRETT just went from a humble 32K to 173K in an hour—looks like it found the portal gun for gains! 🚀💥 ⋅ $GARRETT ⋅ 🔎

14 May 2026, 13:43 UTC148 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐦 Share on 𝕏 and tag @RickBurpBot ❎ TRY: Trade multichain on OKX

13 May 2026, 00:34 UTC156 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

NextGPU Buy! 💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻💻 💵 0.99 ETH ($2258.01) 🪙 689,593 NGPU 🔷 0xce3a…7a5a | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $332,939 📊 Chart 🦄 Trade 🔹 Trending

12 May 2026, 16:04 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

NextGPU Buy! 🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢 💵 0.495 ETH ($1120.98) 🪙 723,662 NGPU 🔷 0xb7da…0f3a | Txn ✅ New Holder 🔼 Market Cap $154,105 📊 Chart 🦄 Trade 🔹 Trending

❤‍🔥1

11 May 2026, 10:16 UTC113 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Phanes_botPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ALPHARDHUNTER. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ALPHARD HUNTER ETH” (@ALPHARDHUNTER), 433 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ALPHARDHUNTER.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.