Channel
@AIjqx0
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
533subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001998214245 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AIjqx0 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AIjqx0 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 533 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 535 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 535 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 17 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
450 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 134 | 29.8% | |
| ❤ | 96 | 21.3% | |
| 🔥 | 94 | 20.9% | |
| 😁 | 65 | 14.4% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 2.22% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 1.78% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 1.33% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 0.667% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.667% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.667% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.222% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.222% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.222% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 450reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2025 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#polymarket В ленте/чатиках развернулась очередная драма на тему того, какая помойка полимаркет. Кто не в курсе: там был рынок "Продаст ли Strategy биты в мае?". 1 июня выходит официальная новость о том, что Strategy продали 32 BTC по средней цене 77135$ в период с 26 по 30 мая. Но так как эта новость вышла 1 июня, по логике полимаркета это означает что Strategy продали в июне 🤣. Соответственно рынок резолвнулся как…
😁9❤4🔥3😱2
^ репостнул коллегу по подкасту 🙃 там дальше еще вторая часть
❤10👍5👏1
Ч1. Решил наконец-таки немного покопаться в Clarity акте, в твитере как-то пропустил обсуждения. Проклятая соц сеть кидает посты в духе, кого убьешь Monad, MegaETH, Somnia, FOGO - убейте пожалуйста всех) Сразу понравилось, что одно из названий документа “Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act” — то есть буквально акт против CBDC и цифровой слежки. Заголовок красивый, при чем, что радует это не просто популисткое названи…
❤9👍7🔥1🤔1
#DeFi #HYPE HYPE флипнул солану по фдв. Эх... опять соланаголовым надо платить деньги KOLам и разворачивать очередную хейт компанию в твиттере, но на этот раз не против эфира, а против хайпа. SOL-помойка в очередной раз оправдывает свою репутацию центра рагов и срачей
😁14🍾5🔥5❤1
#podcast #EP3 #DeFi Лучше поздно чем никогда. Третий эпизод подкаста. Приятного прослушивания. https://youtu.be/b8gyc9HlCZ0
👍17❤9🔥8
Кстати, в этом канале есть статья про LayerZero от 22 ноября 2023 года, и там есть вот такой кусок (на скрине) Вот еще список проектов у которых тоже 1-of-1 DVN https://x.com/banteg/status/2045804597407617079
🔥7🤝6👍4
Наблюдаю за вчерашним хаком rsETH, который вызвал серьезные проблемы в Aave. Если копнуть глубже - вылезает много интересного! Для начала: похоже, ни у Curve, ни у Yield Basis нет экспозиции ни к проблемам rsETH, ни к проблемам Aave. Но вся эта история началась с LayerZero, на который полагается крипта стоимостью в четверть триллиона долларов! Так что произошло? Давайте разберемся. rsETH от Kelp использует мост Lay…
❤10👍8🔥3😱1
#DeFi #exploit #Kelp #LayerZero #L0 Короче я думаю уже итак большинство в курсе взлома, но там все куда печальнее... Kelp вскрыли на 280$ мультов. Но то что казалось взломом келпа, на самом деле оказалось уязвимостью DVN v1 валидатора LayerZero, тоесть в потенциальной опасности помимо rsETH также и другие OFT токены. Ethena и Tether уже остановили свои мосты: https://x.com/ethena/status/2045604492239159793 https://…
❤17🤔9⚡5🔥3🤝2👍1🤯1
#DeFi #Aerodrome #Velodrome В Q2 2026 произойдет слияние Aerodrome с Velodrome в единый декс, вместе с этим будет запуск на новых сетях (Ethereum, Arc), а также изменения некоторых основных механик. Анонс этого мероприятия был на крупной оффлайн конфе в ноябре 2025 года, более подробно почитать можно по ссылке: https://paragraph.com/@aerodrome-foundation/aero Сегодняшние токены AERO, VELO (включая ve-локи) будут ко…
🔥7👍5❤3
#podcast #EP2 #DeFi Очередной воскресный пост. Второй эпизод подкаста. Приятного прослушивания. https://youtu.be/2mnVg5W3ihg
👍14🔥11❤8🍌1
#podcast #EP1 #DeFi Уже традиционный для этого канала воскресный пост, но на этот раз решил попробовать новый формат - запилили с коллегой спонтанный подкаст. Будем (надеюсь) стараться регулярно собираться, обсуждать рынок и делать некий срез. Есть мысли уже о том кого из нашей отрасли позвать на выпуск в будущем. Короче будем посмотреть, как говорится. В пилотном выпуске: - рассказали немного о себе для контекста …
👍30❤18🔥8🎉3🍌1🥱1
#DeFi #AAVE #drama https://teletype.in/@warpjq/sF11nDNPivJ По традиции - воскресное (ну почти) чтиво. Драма вокруг AAVE. *P.S. - в прошлом посте обещал еще в ближайшую неделю но заболел, а потом опять работа нахлынула, поэтому извиняюсь.
🔥25👍11👏4
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AIjqx0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 526,156 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xAIjq” (@AIjqx0), 533 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AIjqx0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.