Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AI.Sector

@AI_Sector_AI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

422subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003929997237
TypeChannel
Username@AI_Sector_AI
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 24 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AI_Sector_AI

Growth

422425423.56 August 2026 — 423 subscribers6 August 2026 — 423 subscribers6 August 2026 — 425 subscribers13 August 2026 — 422 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:58422-3
6 Aug 2026, 21:45425+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:30423no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:51423first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 24 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.9%
avg views ÷ 422 subscribers
Avg views / post
325
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held15 (24 May 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,298
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

151 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5737.7%
3221.2%
👍3221.2%
👏106.62%
💯85.30%
😁53.31%
🤣21.32%
🌚10.662%
🎉10.662%
👌10.662%
👎10.662%
🤓10.662%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC161 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сделал видео полностью с помощью ИИ, и весь бюджет на это был нулевым 🎬 Выпустил его в преддверие годовщины 9 августа. Задача была через утрирование показать абсурдность многого из того, что происходит в стране. Схема создания 📝 Сценарий: сам (сейчас эту часть уже отлично берёт на себя ИИ); 🖼️ Статичные кадры: инструменты Google; 🎞️ Оживление кадров: Google Studio и Runway; 🎵 Музыка и песня: Suno. Этому видео боль

👍10🔥2👌1

27 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC284 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Один промпт, и текст перестаёт звучать как написанный AI 🤖 Когда особенно важно, чтобы тексты, отчёты, публичные заявления, публикации на сайт и др. читалось как живой человек, а не шаблон. 🖥 Заходишь в Claude и пишешь: «Изучи страницу Wikipedia «Signs of AI writing» и составь список всех признаков, паттернов и особенностей текста, которые выдают, что он написан ИИ. Проанализируй каждый из них и с этого момента ник

🔥10👍3👎1😁1

22 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC316 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

3️⃣ месяца каналу 🎉 Спасибо, что читаете и делитесь материалами, это помогает каналу расти. Если хочешь поддержать: 👾 Перешли пост или канал коллегам, которым тема актуальна; 👾 Поделись в своих чатах или каналах; 👾 Или поддержи донатом. Добавил контакты в описание канала, можно писать напрямую. Вот с чем могу помочь теперь 🛠 Создание продукта → сайт, игра, квиз, видео, эксплейнер, визуализация, мини-приложение. С

🔥64

16 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC537 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💳 Большинство НГО платит за инструменты, которые можно получить бесплатно или с дисконтом до 75% Claude (Anthropic) До 75% скидки на Team и Enterprise планы. Верификация через Goodstack. В пакет входит бесплатный курс AI Fluency for Nonprofits и подключение к Blackbaud, Candid и Benevity. → anthropic.com/news/claude-for-nonprofits ChatGPT (OpenAI) 20%-75% скидки. Верификация через TechSoup или Goodstack. → openai.c

11

10 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC424 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уже делился тут примерами интерактивов, которые создавал через AI: игры, квизы, карты событий. Всё это обычный HTML-файл на выходе. Скачать и открыть на компьютере технически можно. Но отправить коллеге неудобно, с телефона не открыть, а объяснять «скачай, найди файл, открой в браузере» лишние шаги. Для тестирования командой, сбора обратной связи или просто чтобы показать прототип до финальной публикации намного уд

👍9

4 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC382 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Даёшь CapCut ссылку на статью и через несколько минут получаете готовый ролик с озвучкой, субтитрами и монтажом Большинство знает CapCut как редактор для рилсов. Но в браузерной версии есть отдельный AI-агент, который закрывает весь цикл производства видео самостоятельно. 🎬 Что он делает по ссылке → читает материал и вычленяет ключевые тезисы; → пишет сценарий и раскадровку; → выбирает визуальный стиль; → генерируе

🔥9🌚1

29 Jun 2026, 15:09 UTC393 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ситуация в секторе изменилась, нужно быстро понять контекст. Gemini сам собирает источники, структурирует и выдаёт документ с цитатами. Это называется Deep Research и это только одна из вещей, которые большинство пользователей в нём не замечает. 🆓 Бесплатно Deep Research. Не ответ на вопрос, а исследовательский агент. Даёшь задачу, он разбивает её на подвопросы, обходит сотни источников и через несколько минут возв

👍52

23 Jun 2026, 15:56 UTC440 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Пост про игру получил охват в 43 раза выше среднего. Создал за несколько часов в Claude, без программирования и бюджета. 🎮 Игра Выборы в беларуский Координационный совет. Задача: привлечь внимание к событию и организации. Создал пиксельную игру в стиле винтажных аркад: лабиринт, голоса-звёзды, монстры-лжецы, пиксельная музыка. В финале призыв проголосовать и ссылка. Результат: охват поста с игрой только в канале о

🔥8😁4🤓1

18 Jun 2026, 14:18 UTC393 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Оказывается, AI можно не открывать. Он может жить внутри браузера. Браузерные расширения — это AI прямо на странице, где ты работаешь. Читаешь документ, статью, письмо → выделяешь текст и получаешь перевод, саммари, ключевые идеи. Без новой вкладки, без копипаста, без потери контекста. Расширений уже сотни. Взял три разных по возможностям и логике работы. 🟠 Claude for Chrome: на первый взгляд всё скромно. Но это о

🔥3🤣2👍1

12 Jun 2026, 14:12 UTC434 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

AI-инструмент, который закрывает значительную часть визуальных задач НГО и пользоваться можно бесплатно. Adobe Firefly не один инструмент, а спектр специализированных AI-продуктов. Обучен только на лицензионном контенте Adobe, можно использовать в публикациях и кампаниях без юридических рисков. 🖥 На практике Фото с акции: расширил кадр, убрал лишнее, адаптировал под Instagram, сайт и рассылку. Без Photoshop. Кампан

7🔥5🎉1

7 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC413 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Думаю подготовить разбор NotebookLM, но сначала интересно понять, насколько он уже вам знаком.

  1. Да, регулярно32%
  2. Пробовал(а), но не прижился23%
  3. Слышал(а), но не пробовал(а)31%
  4. Впервые слышу14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC426 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Записать реальный голос иногда невозможно. Не только из соображений качества, но и безопасности. Для активистов и журналистов, работающих с чувствительными темами, деанонимизация через голос это реальный риск. AI-озвучка решает эту проблему напрямую. Но сценариев больше. Подкаст, озвучка ролика или эксплейнера, несколько спикеров в диалоге, всё это теперь делается без студии и микрофона. Расскажу про три инструмен

🔥8👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @AI_Sector_AI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

Думаю подготовить разбор NotebookLM, но сначала интересно понять, насколько он уже вам знаком.

  1. Да, регулярно32%
  2. Пробовал(а), но не прижился23%
  3. Слышал(а), но не пробовал(а)31%
  4. Впервые слышу14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 214,004 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AI.Sector” (@AI_Sector_AI), 422 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AI_Sector_AI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.