Channel
@ABDOO1231
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001206261319 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ABDOO1231 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 28 January 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ABDOO1231 |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @ABDOO1231/7065 · this entry1 Jun 2021, 04:20 UTC | @b_o_h_f/4851 Jun 2021, 04:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ABDOO1231/7422 · this entry27 Jun 2021, 08:43 UTC | @b_o_h_f/52027 Jun 2021, 08:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ABDOO1231/7662 · this entry8 Jul 2021, 13:04 UTC | @b_o_h_f/5728 Jul 2021, 13:04 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @ABDOO1231/9858 · this entry26 Sept 2021, 06:31 UTC | @b_o_h_f/67226 Sept 2021, 06:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @b_o_h_f/7215 Nov 2021, 16:59 UTC | @ABDOO1231/11037 · this entry5 Nov 2021, 17:00 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @b_o_h_f | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 28 January 2021 to 29 June 2022. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ABDOO1231 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:17 | 26 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 06:49 | 27 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 26 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 26 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 January 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
نصائح ونكت♨️ للكبار فقط💯 https://telegram.me/joinchat/AAAAAFTHut0e-4vA9GgJVw ~~~~ 10k @PenWar فديوعبارات 09k @Medicine_universe عالم الطب 08k @Rorita_Videos ️ فيديوها 07k @nokat1000 🤣نكت يمني🤣 06k @apk963 ^^^^ 05k @E_100K نكت طازجـ 05k @ShellYabuHanzalah1 حنظلة 04k @nekat2mhasis نــكــت ت 03k @Supplicatio2ns ادعية وأذك 02k @Ssll_55 -واذكــروا ^^^^ 02k @slaH33 بــحًـــٍة 02k @A_i_l0 تطـ ـبيقات 02k @lilelip فيد…
Signed السلاطيــ♚ـن الظهر نواشئ
عزا شوفو شهد الشمري بلا ملابس 😶👇🏻 @ss62bot @ss62bot @ss62bot
Signed ㅤ
افلام السهره 🙈🔞 عراقي بس 👇🏻🤤 @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot @x92zbot
Signed ㅤ
َ ∶💠∶ » للستتةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k♥ « ∶💠∶ ∶💠∶ للاشتراك @KINGG340 ∶💠∶ ء∶◈∶ » ∶💠∶ ∶◈∶ء « َ 𝟎𝟏↡h ˢʰᵃᵗᵃᵗ ↡@shatat_2021 𝟎𝟒↡h هاانا ↡@KINGG348 𝟎𝟒↡h سنذكر ↡@KINGG347 𝟎𝟑↡h باندا. ↡@banda_t 𝟎𝟐↡h -إَيلان ↡@nanooo123 𝟎𝟒↡h فنون ↡@Fun00n 𝟎𝟔↡h كنت لها ↡@a1466104360 𝟎𝟏↡k شَغف ↡@ai_al37 𝟎𝟏↡h تناغم مع الكون ↡@lovejerny 𝟎𝟏↡h تعلم الانجليزيه ↡@Englishlearningbx 𝟎𝟏↡h رسومات في عالم الفن …
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
https://t.me/joinchat/RcAahxN5ouQDVxXE
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
الآن، والعالم يأكله القلق، والجميع يطلب الطمأنينة، أنا أطلب يداك..♥️!
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
◈ خبئني بك دع كُل من ينظر لقلبك يراني فيبتعد ◈ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
بلادي اُحييك فلتسلمي وما عشتُ يا اُمِ لن تُظلمي دمي يا بلادي وما في يدي فداءٌ يحييك ملء الفمِ أنا بعضُ ما في ثراكِ الطهور ومن ذا إلى الأرض لا ينتمي حنيني إلى الموت إن جاءكِ عدوٌ تخـــيل أن تُهزمي الـ عيد الـ59 للثورة المجيدة .. 26 سبتمبر تحيا_الجمهورية_اليمنية.🖤🤍❤️
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
◈ خبئني بك دع كُل من ينظر لقلبك يراني فيبتعد ◈ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
◈ خبئني بك دع كُل من ينظر لقلبك يراني فيبتعد ◈ ﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎﹎
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
لستةة فخمة وفاخرة جديده لدعم القنوات . .🌼 نستقبل القنوات التي من فوق ⋮ 100 ⋮ عضو الستةة راقية ومنضمة النشر ولحذف فيها تلقائي مسائيةً لتجنب ازعاج الاعضاء مواقيت انشر ⋮ 3 عصراً الى 6 صباحاَ ⋮ للاشتراك ودعم قناتك زياده مضمونه ودعم مستمر ‹‹ اضغط هنا 👈 @KINGG340 ››🌼
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
لستةة فخمة وفاخرة جديده لدعم القنوات . .🌼 نستقبل القنوات التي من فوق ⋮ 100 ⋮ عضو الستةة راقية ومنضمة النشر ولحذف فيها تلقائي مسائيةً لتجنب ازعاج الاعضاء مواقيت انشر ⋮ 3 عصراً الى 6 صباحاَ ⋮ للاشتراك ودعم قناتك زياده مضمونه ودعم مستمر ‹‹ اضغط هنا 👈 @KINGG340 ››🌼
Signed لستةة شغف لدعم القنوات 1k
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ABDOO1231. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ABDOO1231 named 40 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حـﮧ͡ـ̷ٰ̯ــروفﹷツـ᭄ٰ۪۫ﹷـنـ✧َُِــا ✌️س͡ر 🤞بسمتنا✍ ،♥️🐼 ⌯” (@ABDOO1231), 26 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ABDOO1231.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.