12 Aug 2026, 05:21 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel
南山 露娜
@zzz358350
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
12subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004460716604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzz358350 |
| Description | 私聊: @zzz3580 双向: @zzz3580Bot |
| Created | 10 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzz358350 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 12 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1138.3%
- avg views ÷ 12 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 137
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,366 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 3s
- Average length
- 3s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
12 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC35 viewsread 12 August 2026
起床开课，头客还在，宝宝们赶紧来预订喔
11 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC98 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo
马上就下班喽，最后等一个宝宝过来享受我的服务👄👄
11 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC114 viewsread 12 August 2026
差点又忘了新的报告🙃
11 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC127 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @beautys_list
报告模版 【学生留名】: kk 【验证老师】: (露娜➕@zzz3580） 【验证时间】：8月11日 【所在位置】：南山 【优点缺点】：老师真人很惊艳，五官立体，巴掌脸、大眼睛，远比照片好看，照片p丑了。身材前凸后翘，臀部丰满，胸有稍微点科技，但瑕不掩瑜。非常值得推荐，原本出击没抱希望，结果来了个惊喜。 【推荐程度】：满分9.9分 【出击分享】：课表服务都有，长相甜美、非常健谈； 口技很好、持续时间还很久，各项技术都很好，情绪价值也到位。老师反馈原本是大圈的，以前不是这个价格，很享受的一次出击，非常值得推荐。 https://t.me/+GDA_JqD2LmJiZWQx
11 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC158 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
有点小忙，抽时间发一下喜欢我的宝宝约课截图😘😘
11 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTC164 viewsread 12 August 2026
开课了 宝宝们
11 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC173 viewsread 12 August 2026
深圳榨汁大队报告区：https://t.me/szzzbgq #南山 #露娜 【验证留名】：kzzz 【验证时间】：2026 8 10 【修车水费】：1100 【服务内容】：课表有的都有！ 【颜值身材】： 00后川妹子～比照片好看很多 【凶器罩杯】：D 【体验细节】：进门见面发现和照片一样好看、甚至更好看，身材无敌，腰细胸大，于是果断交水费。老师很热情 帮忙拿拖鞋 进来就给我递过来水，简单聊了聊就脱衣服去洗澡 老师很温柔帮忙试下水温然后涂满沐浴露在我身上游走，看着老师的身材当时就硬了 于是老师当场就蹲下来口有满满的 包裹感（无齿感）。洗完擦干后躺在床上 老师先用两个大白兔在我身上游走，接着舔的我痒痒的很舒服（这时我下面已经非常硬了）然后老师就用樱桃小嘴含住来回上下左右舔（老师的嘴巴有种魔力接近真空的感觉）几下我就受不了了急忙让老师帮忙戴上套套 先是女上位 刚进入时有突破的感觉紧接着非常的热 接着就有满满的包裹感 非常的嫩…
10 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC215 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video
认证视频，不要再问是不是本人了，人照一致的 私聊: @zzz3580 双向: @zzz3580Bot
10 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC265 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo
私聊: @zzz3580 双向: @zzz3580Bot 初来深圳，今日首课🉑预约 人照一致，非诚勿扰。
10 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @zzz358350. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 491,441 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南山 露娜” (@zzz358350), 12 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzz358350.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.