郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:童童 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9 【验证时间】:2026-08-15 【过程描述】:今天过去换地方,一进门,今天穿了白黑情趣,女友感拉满,新的房间很大很宽敞,干净舒服不压抑,简单聊一会喝了点水。进浴室一次性用品齐全,开始帮洗,擦干后我直接躺床上。于是措不及防就开始了,像是欲求不满的女友强行索爱,服务很细心,课表的服务真的很到位,在郑州找过这么多的老师,童童很顶,让人仿佛飘在云端,口活更是绝,让我全身都非常舒服,口的太深了,全身都有酥麻的感觉,老师见状带上 tt 做上来,进入时感觉很烫很紧,一边上下摇动,销魂的感觉,微微的叫床声,隐隐约约能听到水声,两手抓着奶子,让我更加卖力,接着后入式,圆润的臀围,紧致的下身,各种姿势,终于出水。中场喝水…

Channel
郑州师范报告收录
@zzsf121
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,768subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003098245472 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzsf121 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzsf121 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 14,768 | +3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 14,765 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 14,763 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 14,777 | +37 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 14,740 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 14,739 | +15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 14,724 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 14,718 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 14,721 | first reading |
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.64%
- avg views ÷ 14,768 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 685
- 47 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.069%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 47
- of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (4 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,188 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈79
- Links
- ≈2,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:YOYO私影女仆 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 10 【验证时间】:2026-08-06 【过程描述】:工作疲惫,需要抚慰。下了班就直接去了。喊了晶晶。颜值没得说,性格是yoyo那里最开朗的。聊的超级开心又差点忘了正事儿。最后进入正题。技术好,花活儿多,言语也多,被撩得不要不要的。最后出氵了她还说,小样不迷死你。谁懂这种感觉我靠!简直欲罢不能。去yoyo从来没有失望过!
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:瑜言 【验证留名】:豪仔 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-12 【过程描述】:今天下雨,下班无聊,看到师范车库里来了服务系新老师,离我很近,还好停车,到地方老师遥控上楼,付完水费,老师先帮我洗的澡,然后开始吃🐔,全程不用自己动手,服务的很周到,然后擦干身体,先爬到床上开始做服务,服务很仔细,中间还说有不满意的地方可以随时提,老师活好,👅灵活,接着做上面,胸推,舌吻,舔咪咪,课表上的服务都有,老师很配合,喜欢服务系御姐的,南方妹子,皮肤白,人照一致,闭眼冲!
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:可儿 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-12 【过程描述】:约了好多天终于约上老师,就算下雨也抵挡不住出击的冲动。由于上个师兄迟到导致罚站了一会,上楼看到的老师真人,比图片还要好看些。陪洗很体贴,一直关心会不会怕冷,帮洗还递毛巾。洗澡过程还会贴贴大蟒蛇水中潇,搞得我欲火焚身。来到床上换好蕾姆 cos 再来大蟒蛇亲全身 69,然后传教位后入一并操作,由于本人体力不支很快倒下了,让老师帮忙打出。她涂上润滑油,双手像着魔一样弄着我弟弟,手法太好了弄得我欲仙欲死,再加上老师在身旁不断挑逗,简直魅魔降临。事后洗澡跟老师聊了会走人,临走拥抱让亲她脸,就是贴心小女友模样,满分必返。
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:宁宁 【验证留名】:追着你马超 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【验证时间】:2026-08-12 【过程描述】:下午没事喊了上门pp,进房间后交水费一起洗澡,身材真是看不腻,胸型和腿直戳心巴,健谈,在沙发干好后入好紧,干正事想忍都忍不住,直接释放。这次 cj 也是非常满意了。
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:童童 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9 【验证时间】:2026-08-12 【过程描述】:今天正好有空看到了童童老师开课 急忙约了起来,约定时间到老师楼下,无等待直接上楼,老师开门后热情的请进房间,身材凹凸有致,肤致很好淡淡的妆容,进门之后坐在沙发上跟老师简单聊了会,很健谈,不会冷场,本来有点害羞的我被老师短短几句话撩拨起来,脱了衣服去洗澡 老师的熊真的很大很白很挺 简直不可多得的尤物简单清洗之后上床躺着,开始任老师操作,先从胸前开始,直达三角区,口的时候很认真,同时还会观察你的表情,做出不同的动作,就想这么一直口下去。口了许久之后,课表上服务都有,不一一介绍了,老师看我硬的能敲砖,带上套开始女上深蹲,进去第一感觉很紧,会坐会摇;担心老师累了,…
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:可儿 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 8 【服务得分】: 10 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:和可儿约好时间后到达指定地点,遥控上楼。老师的工作室位于公寓,进门后,可儿已经穿着一身性感的情趣内衣在等候。真人与照片基本无差,妆容精致,身材标准匀称,而且性格温柔、非常擅长聊天,初次见面就完全没有冷场和尴尬。她不仅主动安排行程,而且互动自然,情绪价值给得极足,让人感觉像是在和情人约会,而不是机械地走流程。 服务先从背面开始,她用胸部推背按摩,让人瞬间放松。随后转到正面,精细的指滑和全身游走舔舐接踵而至,她的舌头非常柔软,所到之处带来阵阵酥麻感。 当气氛烘托到极致,戴好安全套后以传教士姿势正式开战。此时她早已水流泛滥,且身体的契合度极高。我火力全开…
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:宁宁 【验证留名】:ADD 【人照得分】: 10 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.33 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:找宁宁好几次了,pp一路开过来,老师态度很好不着急不催 陪我洗澡 满足了所有的要求,只要要求不过分都满足了。在沙发舔了一会非常敏感,在床上很主动,身材真的很好 约过很多次了,非常推荐。
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:云舒 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 8 【身材得分】: 10 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.83 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:二约云舒妹妹了,约的很顺利,在楼下等了几分钟上楼,进房间前出了点小意外,对面在装修,和云舒妹妹在电梯间聊了一会。一回生二回熟,都是熟人了聊的也很开心。进房间后交水费一起洗澡,身材真是看不腻,胸型和腿直戳心巴,后面床上服务也有了很大进步,干正事想忍都忍不住,直接释放。这次 cj 也是非常满意了,后面多返
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:云舒 【验证留名】:Larry Hollis 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 10 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 10 【综合得分】: 9.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:云舒妹妹@yunshu625 今天重振雄风! 2个月前我来过妹妹这里,不过由于前一天运动量大,没休息好导致课上硬不起来,妹妹也没有不耐烦反而在一旁等我,最后我还是不行,妹妹也登的有点瞌睡,我说算了吧,妹妹也是爽快退了一部分马尼,态度好。 ————分割线———— 你休养良久,发觉今日是个好日子,宜出行、宜出击,虽然有点小雨但是你热情高涨。 你提前一天约好的老师,到点了不回消息,苦等也没结果。你很生气。 这时你看到了云舒妹妹发来的“今天开哦”,你听着地铁到站声,看着这条消息心里在决断! 决定了今日宜出击!不就是一小时吗?!忍得住!…
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:穆子 【验证留名】:匿名 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 8 【态度得分】: 8 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.5 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:嫩妹,没什么服务,喜欢的可以去试试
郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:晴天 【验证留名】:关我什么事 (谎言不会伤人,真相才是快刀) 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 7 【态度得分】: 9 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 8.67 【验证时间】:2026-08-11 【过程描述】:对晴天老师早有耳闻,可惜之前没开几天便草草停课,如今重新开课必不能错过,预约好时间后遥控上楼,位置很好找,上楼后老师已经留好了门。推门而入老师穿一身旗袍装很显气质,妆容很淡,毫无风尘气息。本人和头像照片很像,肤色正常黄皮,长相虽然很御但线下小小一只,气质颜值身材俱佳是我喜欢的类型。交完水费后老师没有主动陪洗,说已经洗过我便独自简单清洗一下后擦干躺床上,床面有些乱明显有战斗过的痕迹还未及时恢复。躺床上后老师先是帮忙舔咪咪然后一路向下一口含住🐔上下吞吐起来,口活相当不错,口的时候还会时不时看向你,会有眼神间的互动,吃…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @zzsf121. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 93,485 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“郑州师范报告收录” (@zzsf121), 14,768 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzsf121.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.