郑州师范学院修车群专属报告 【妹子花名】:书瑶 【验证留名】:疯狂星期三 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】: 9 【服务得分】: 8 【态度得分】: 8 【环境得分】: 8 【综合得分】: 8.5 【验证时间】:2026-09-30 【过程描述】:看到老师的热情洋溢赶紧出击,进门认真看了下,人照合一,去掉美颜就是本人,洗澡上床,没有多余服务,直接开启口活,口的很舒服,时间也挺久的,不说就一直口,最后就是冲刺环节,老师很敏感,稍微亲一下内陷的奶头立马坚挺了,直接提枪上马,一进入就感受到了一阵爽感,很紧啊,老师居然比我发出的呻吟还大,抽插一会就能感受到老师身体在发出有爽感的轻微颤抖,嘴里还在说着“太深了,宝贝,慢点”床感极佳,叫床很大声,很自然,就是互动不多,容易冷场,兄弟们可以冲呀

Channel
书瑶的朋友圈
@shuyao5886
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
560subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 1 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004435280805 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shuyao5886 |
| Created | 28 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 1 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shuyao5886 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 560 | +15 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 18:22 | 545 | no change |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 545 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 28 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.0%
- avg views ÷ 560 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 336
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.424%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (28 September 2026 – 1 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,343 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 28 September 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📊 0条车评 写报告 好评 0% | 人照 | 服务 中评 0% | 颜值 | 态度 差评 0% | 身材 | 环境 【郑州师范老师验证榜】 【编号】#725 【花名】#书瑶 【车牌】@shuyao5669 【地址】#中原区 【标签】#中原区 #御姐甜妹型#胸大腿长 #可御可甜#S身材 #三点粉嫩 #600p 【硬件】身高165、体重95、c+,皮肤挺白净的,三点粉嫩,下面挺紧的 【软件】 陪洗,裸口,舌吻,69,情绪价值高,不冷场 【课费】 :#600/P 1200PP 【验证】#已验证 验证报告 【综合评分】颜值9、硬件评分得出的综合评分 【优惠】 【特别提示】🐻很挺 、皮肤白嫩 服务态度好,不冷场、很配合,听话,可爱,语气温柔 这个价格值得冲 【报告查阅】https://t.me/zzsf12
❤1
开课啦,新人首开,面付无定,可上门,有教室,各种姿势任选,玩的开😍😍😍
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @shuyao5886. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“书瑶的朋友圈” (@shuyao5886), 560 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shuyao5886.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.