公告 📣 上榜理由:诈骗定金,诱导他人到楼下叫付全款 ,在说房号,不给直接删消息! 给予曝光处理 骗子联系方式:@jy18118 骗子频道链接:@j181118 骗子老套路了,各位狼友需注意‼️
👍1

Channel
@zzddbjhb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
270subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002324269538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzddbjhb |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzddbjhb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 270 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 270 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 14 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2025 to 13 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
公告 📣 上榜理由:诈骗定金,诱导他人到楼下叫付全款 ,在说房号,不给直接删消息! 给予曝光处理 骗子联系方式:@jy18118 骗子频道链接:@j181118 骗子老套路了,各位狼友需注意‼️
👍1
公告📣 这种主动联系 切勿相信 ⚠️ 说标记欺诈的都是骗子 拉黑即可
👍1
北京榨汁黑榜 pinned a photo
公告📣 此为骗子(@zzbjtgyy)冒充管理员 切勿相信 本人不会主动 联系任何人
重要提醒🔔 又有老哥被骗了! 骗子ID:@yyyaay11 频道: https://t.me/huolinger_12 约老师 认准榨汁选妃区 https://t.me/zhazhibeijingxf 不上榜 一概别约 骗子多
🔔重要提醒🔔 此人为惯犯 约老师 上房间威胁敲诈要钱 已经好几个老师被搞了 这人经常换账号⚠️ 各位老师注意防范⚠️
利用老师害怕心理, 群发敲诈要💰,恶心至极!!! 各位老师注意防范哦
骗子ID:@xiaominsj 频道: @t.me/xiaoyan666898 此人为诈骗分子 行为很恶劣 给予下榜曝光处理 上榜老师和不在榜上的 各位狼友都要见面在付款⚠️ 没有见面叫给钱的都是骗子
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @zzddbjhb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 788,126 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zzddbjhb named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“北京榨汁黑榜” (@zzddbjhb), 270 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzddbjhb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.