Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 睁眼看世界

Channel

睁眼看世界

@zyksj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

425subscribers

+41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002970591580
TypeChannel
Username@zyksj
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zyksj

Growth

384425404.57 August 2026 — 384 subscribers8 August 2026 — 384 subscribers8 August 2026 — 385 subscribers16 August 2026 — 399 subscribers24 August 2026 — 425 subscribers7 August 202624 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 17 days, net +41. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 21:57425+26
16 Aug 2026, 18:38399+14
8 Aug 2026, 06:22385+1
8 Aug 2026, 06:04384no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:24384first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.75%
avg views ÷ 425 subscribers
Avg views / post
7.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held18 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total134
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC4 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 终于看到 V2 有人发 mac 不好用了....我一直以为只有我觉得难用 Telegraph | source (author: Ryanzlab)

8 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 月薪 2W+,工作轻松但几乎没有成长,毕业四五年该继续待着吗? Telegraph | source (author: JoeLin33)

8 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 ChatGPT 这次真要解禁成人内容了? Telegraph | source (author: Freeego)

8 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 准备做一个反假货网站,有得搞吗? LaLy: 最近在闲鱼买到了假药,而且上面同类型的假药有很多,但想到其他人应该不知道或者不会辨别假药。 所以想做一个反假货的网站,曝光卖假货的商家,包括如果辨别这是假货。防止再有人受骗。 请各位大佬,用你最严厉的语言反驳这个需求,看下这个是不是伪需求。 source (author: LaLy)

8 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 抽奖:量产 AI 硬件的通讯协议和小程序源码全开源了,配合 AI 编程可以直接改成自己的产品 Telegraph | source (author: liqinliqin)

8 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 AI Coding 还看源代码吗?要是不看,会害怕血崩吗? Telegraph | source (author: edgeedge)

8 Aug 2026, 03:10 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 彩礼,嫁女儿与卖女儿 nathandoge: 最近我稍微理解了国内彩礼的逻辑,彩礼这个习俗有好有坏。 男方给高额彩礼,然后女方父母回礼,并添一笔自己的钱 或是 房子 车子。 回礼 > 彩礼 = 嫁女儿 这种习俗就属于好习俗,类似于某种资金互助模式:双方父母一起出钱,帮助两个年轻人建立新的家庭。 而有些女方父母不做人的, 拿了男方彩礼,拿了男方的彩礼却基本不回礼。或是拿了 28 万 8 ,然后回礼 8 万,这种就属于卖女儿。 source (author: nathandoge)

8 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC5 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

「中国食物“中毒”地图 云南居然输给了山东」 加班到深夜,回家时人已经热化。空调一开,往沙发上一躺,再来盒冰西瓜果切,几分钟就能炫完。 当时吃得有多爽,半夜就可能有多狼狈。凌晨你的肚子突然开始翻江倒海,整夜在床和厕所之间来回冲刺,最后拉得双腿发软。 问题大概率出在果切上。这种由不洁食物引发的腹痛、腹泻等病症,医学上统称为“食源性疾病”。 因为吃而生病,大家心目中的第一名,非“红伞伞白杆杆,吃完之后躺板板”的云南莫属。根据 2023 年全国食源性疾病监测数据,云南报告的食源性疾病暴发事件涉及 5351 名患者,全国第一,死亡人数也最多。 但最让人意外的是山东。同年食源性疾病事件数高达 1395 起,比云南还高,发病人数仅次于云南。 由于致病因素复杂,各地检测能力不一,大部分食源性疾病都无法确诊具体原因,但依然可以从过往研究中找到一些线索。 一项针对山东 2011-2016 年食源性疾病的研究发现,已知致病因素中,主要

8 Aug 2026, 02:55 UTC6 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

“波斯信使综合征”。 讲的是当人面对坏消息时,很容易把愤怒发泄到传递坏消息的人身上,而不是去面对消息本身…… 这个古波斯“杀信使”的故事「穷查理宝典」也引用过。看「清平乐」里的宋仁宗赵祯,他身上有一种极其可贵的品质,广开言路! 韩琦可以当面指责皇帝,富弼可以据理力争,范仲淹也可以直陈政见…… 赵祯当然也会不高兴也会犹豫,也会有自己的判断,但他没有因为“不爱听”就让说话的人闭嘴,这其实是一种非常稀缺的领导力! 一个人真正危险的时候,并不是身边的人开始批评你,而是有一天所有的人都只告诉你你想听的话。管理一个国家如此,管理一家企业如此,经营一段关系其实也是如此。 联想到当下我们每个人,不要因讨厌一个消息,就讨厌告诉你这个消息的人,坏消息不会因为你愤怒而消失。相反,一个能够让别人放心说真话的人才有可能比别人更早知道风险、更早的修正错误。 「清平乐」这部剧虽然不是正剧有戏说的成分,但里面赵祯这个人物刻画的真好,不只是“仁厚”

8 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC8 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 晋升不调薪怎么办 Telegraph | source (author: rearviewmirror)

8 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 opencode go 套餐怎么样 Telegraph | source (author: xwhking)

8 Aug 2026, 02:40 UTC7 viewsread 8 August 2026

V2EX-最热主题 两台 dgx-spark 部署满血 deepseek v4 flash 完全指南,稳定 60~70tok/s 单流 Telegraph | source (author: dbow)

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zyksj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,007,795 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“睁眼看世界” (@zyksj), 425 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zyksj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.