Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The Heroes. 35 brigade of the AFU

Channel

The Heroes. 35 brigade of the AFU

@zsu35_english

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

94subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002112530247
TypeChannel
Username@zsu35_english
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 18 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zsu35_english

Growth

8894916 August 2026 — 89 subscribers9 August 2026 — 89 subscribers14 August 2026 — 88 subscribers8 September 2026 — 92 subscribers16 September 2026 — 94 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 40 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87–95 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 06:4094+2
8 Sept 2026, 02:1592+4
14 Aug 2026, 23:1688-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:4889no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:1989first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁3466.7%
47.84%
😱47.84%
😈35.88%
👏23.92%
👍11.96%
🔥11.96%
🕊11.96%
🤯11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 21 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Oct 2025, 15:01 UTC505 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Guys, we need one thing from abroad! Who can help us? @zsu_35obrmp_bot

😁4😈2🤯1

3 Oct 2024, 14:58 UTC≈1,540 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I will briefly describe the situation in Krynky while I have time Unfortunately, as you can imagine, all the statements about the withdrawal of our forces from this damned settlement were nothing more than an attempt by the authorities to reduce the degree of tension, which was already very high. People have been sent there as before, and they continue to be sent there. Why? I, like you, do not understand this at al

😁41👍1😱1

29 Jul 2024, 12:44 UTC≈1,310 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Details about the prisoners: They were in touch only at the position. After they left the position, they deliberately stopped communicating. When they realised they couldn't get out on their own, they got in touch again, got a lot of abuse and disappeared again. The group for their evacuation was ready to help them, but they themselves did not appear on the air when they realised that they were waiting for a trial a

2😁2

29 Jul 2024, 12:43 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 9 August 2026

You know that I always stand by the truth, and when guys are really dumped, I never keep quiet about it. This is a completely different situation!

29 Jul 2024, 12:42 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 9 August 2026

I repeat once again: These guys abandoned the position on their own! They did not report it to anyone, so they were lost! At the same time, they brought another group that was working with them under fire. That's why they are traitors and fuck changing them!

29 Jul 2024, 12:41 UTC903 viewsread 9 August 2026

Even if they had managed to get out, they would still be fucked for letting their own people down. They would have received even more cunts, not just duct tape on their heads! So just consider them to be in a sanatorium. Most likely, they understood this themselves and decided to surrender. Traitors in a word.

29 Jul 2024, 12:40 UTC738 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

These bastards fucked off from their position, didn't report it to anyone, and then started moaning that they were pinned down! This is the one case where I can say with certainty that no one abandoned them. It was their own fault that they had to drink water from the swamp, because they didn't want to give up their position. They almost put the other group at risk! So let them sit back and think about their behaviou

😁21

29 Jul 2024, 12:38 UTC585 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Quote from the meeting on prisoners❗️⚡️ No contact with the Russian Federation on their exchange! That's an order! Here we go. That's what I was talking about. No one expects traitors back

😁3

4 Jul 2024, 11:34 UTC664 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Many people are still asking about the evacuation of the dead from Krynky. Once again, I repeat in plain text: forget it. It may be harsh, but it is honest. Evacuation is carried out only if there is a corpse somewhere on the islands. It is almost impossible to pick up a corpse from the shore, and there is no such task, frankly speaking.

😁4🔥1🕊1😈1

4 Jul 2024, 08:36 UTC550 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Yesterday I read somewhere that the NATO summit is coming up. Let them discuss this topic at the summit! Let them change the laws! If a citizen of a NATO country is fighting for Ukraine, he should be granted full amnesty for everything! And definitely not to put him in jail for wearing Gucci glasses!!!! 🤬🤬🤬

😁4

4 Jul 2024, 08:35 UTC469 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Until our partners put their legislation in order, they will be afraid to come to us! There are not enough people. We need 500,000 more! And these cunts are putting a man on trial for fucking Gucci glasses! Are you out of your minds?

😁3😱2

4 Jul 2024, 08:35 UTC402 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

What the fuck... 🤬 The Czech Republic is a NATO country. NATO shouts that they are helping us, but at the same time they are trying a citizen of their country for fighting for us! A Czech citizen who fought for Ukraine is on trial in Prague for illegal service in the armed forces and looting - České noviny Philippe Seaman, 27, took Gucci glasses, cash (the amount is not specified), as well as gold and silver bars t

😁4👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zsu35_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 May 2024, 14:01 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Are you satisfied with the current state of affairs in our brigade? (If not, write to the bot why)

  1. yes19%
  2. no19%
  3. want to know the answers61%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 21 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The Heroes. 35 brigade of the AFU” (@zsu35_english), 94 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zsu35_english.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.