Глубоковажные моменты о жизни Мурманской области
Мы не гнём чью-то линию, потому что нам никто не платит
Почта для ваших любезных обращений: [email protected]
Для связи в ТГ @svolochzapolyarnaya
Created
15 March 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 436–438 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 19:18
437
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47
437
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 October 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
189
Videos
2
Links
194
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
27
77.1%
❤
3
8.57%
🤮
3
8.57%
🔥
2
5.71%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2020 to 24 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы не писали, потому что не хотели
Мы не писали, потому что нет мотивации
Мы не писали, потому что думали, что остальные справятся.
Но нет. Сейчас как коршуны, заблудившиеся в заполярной тундре, решили приземлиться, чтобы дать чёткий сигнал.
К концу февраля 2025 года власть Андрея Чибиса в Мурманской области скатилась к тектоническим провалам, которые только и можно решить в «ручном режиме». Только вот, чья рука бу…
Хорошее мурманское в Telegram
Всё, мы перестаём сволочить ровно на один этот пост и расскажем о самых качественных и приятных каналах Мурманской области. Они все разные, поэтому и есть лучшие.
Мурманский дурдом/Мурманская политика
Самое удивительное явление и такой же удивительный раздел редакций каналов. До сих пор толком никто не знает, почему МурДом и МурПол стали работать по разным ссылкам. Имеются предположен…
Про СМИ
Нам очень жалко, что так никто и не смог из журналистов реализовать потенциал в Telegram.
Есть Би-порт, Мурманский Вестник, Северпост. Многие их читают и переходят на сайты, но их каналы в ТГ существуют только ради существования.
Они перестали следить за собственным контентом внутри мессенджера. Даже если закралась ошибка в заголовке или в несоответствии фотографии, то всем НАПЛЕВАТЬ.
Мурманскому ТГ-сообщ…
Говно на блюде
Мурманский свинопас\Заполярный Всезнайка\Саами с усами\Мурманский городовой
Давайте сразу разберёмся с самым отборным навозом на просторах мурманского Telegrama
ГОСПАДИ
Ну кто мог позволить этим каналам появиться на свет в таком убогом виде?!
Самая жирная пропаганда нужной линии, но которая уже подыхает медленно (или уже подохла).
Про Свинопаса и Всезнайку лучше вообще ничего не говорить (они R.I.P.…
Здравствуйте, дорогие сволочата!
Быть может, вы забыли и о существовании нашего канала, но в течение последних дней уходящего года мы снимем шляпу перед каждым из ТГ-каналов, чтобы отдать дань уважения и войти в новый 2021 год.
30 и 31 декабря мы раскрасим/размажем самых ярких ребят в "ягельной тележеньке", а потом и про себя немного поворкуем.
Готовы?
Спасибо, Ворчун, что не забываешь нас!
Мы хоть и в коме, но не поздравить не могли :)
https://t.me/z_vorchun/7789
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zpsvoloch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы хотите, чтобы Telegram-канал «Заполярная сволочь» продолжил работу? (Опрос продлится 7 дней)
Да, я соскучился по ЗС!60%
Нет, мне достаточно контента40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2020 to 24 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zpsvoloch named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@zapolyrni named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заполярная сволочь” (@zpsvoloch), 437 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zpsvoloch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.