19 May 2025, 03:59 UTC423 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
泰国男子因诈骗受害情绪低落，#纵火焚烧医院以缓解压力 据悉，泰国乌汶叻差他尼府一名 40 岁左右的男子 #因遭遇诈骗而情绪低落，#为缓解心理压力，#他在医院泼洒汽油纵火，导致价值超过 1 亿泰铢的医疗设备被烧毁。 虽然医院工作人员及时疏散患者，确保了人员安全，但大批无法转移的医疗设备仍被烧毁，造成严重损失。 广告
Channel
曝料王|诈骗犯通缉
@zp655
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
641subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001771283524 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zp655 |
| Description | 人而有言，言而有信，信而有践，践而有果，这里就是曝光一切黑平台,黑代理等一切不道德行为,我们公平公正,我们只实事求是进行报道！ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zp655 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 641 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 641 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 5 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 495
- Videos
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
19 May 2025, 03:54 UTC335 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
巴西总统带头割韭菜？公信力崩塌！ 巴西🇧🇷总统官方账号居然亲自发CA，置顶后秒删，只为收割投资人？ 🔹一周前，巴西官方社交账号突然发布消息，声称开通$BRAZIL购买渠道，并附上合约地址👇 9aq61b9BxRMBN3BrVzGs7c9JUK9A7WcbDK9cNC7Lpump 🔹高信誉账号+国民背书，股民毫不犹豫买入！然而，才几十分钟，帖子就被神秘删除，官方没有任何回应！ 🚨黑客攻击还是有预谋的收获？总统公信力瞬间崩塌！ • 如果是黑客攻击，为什么到现在还没有发表任何声明澄清？ • 如果这是官方行为，为什么他们在深夜发布并很快删除？ • 是否存在内幕交易？幕后黑手是谁？ 💥巴西🇧🇷必须给出合理解释！ ✅这次CA是正式认证了吗？ ✅为什么他们删除了帖子却忽视了受害者？ ✅这是否涉及内幕交易？ ⚠️总统不能利用国家信誉来赚钱！我们将联系联合国安理会🇺🇳提起诉讼！ 📢请大家广而告之，让更多人知道$BRAZIL做的事，别…
5 May 2025, 17:45 UTC316 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
#网友曝光 #太阳城集团内幕：内斗、家族任用、暴力管理成常态 近日，有网友曝光太阳城集团内部的混乱管理和黑幕交易，涉及暴力事件、家族式用人、以及员工遭受不公正待遇等问题。 太阳城集团目前已从海边园区4栋3楼搬至七星海，旗下管理着三个盘口，分别是太阳城、新濠国际和威尼斯人。其中，威尼斯人盘口由化名“发哥”的福建人负责，发哥与大老板合作经营。此外，公司的重要岗位均由亲属或关系户把持。 发哥的表弟，化名“温俊”，担任主管，主要负责管理“飞机”业务。而发哥的女友或老婆，化名“雪碧”，则以强硬态度著称，常以高压方式对待员工。据爆料人称，雪碧经常无理责骂员工，甚至曾在2023年12月威胁要拿刀捅人，仅因对方在言语上顶撞了她。 事件的导火索可以追溯到2023年9月。当时，在工作期间因大腿痒涂了药膏，却遭到主管一脚踹过来，随后以“不服从管理”为由被叫到办公室。在要求赔付离职时，公司不但拒绝合理沟通，反而直接对其实施暴力。大老板更是不分青…
5 May 2025, 17:35 UTC224 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
#网友投稿 曝光 人称东哥 号称大老板 福建惠安人 打牌上下几百万美金 结果连16310peso都拿不出来 话都是说的很好听 每次都是今天拖明天 我们商家秉承着以和为贵的原则 一再忍让 结果一直忽悠 过年前说不过拖过年 现在又说一天忽悠一天 各种借口 三天不处理后续曝光护照信息
5 May 2025, 17:30 UTC252 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
表情回应已经关闭 表情太多影响观看文案
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @zp655. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,008,871 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“曝料王|诈骗犯通缉” (@zp655), 641 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zp655.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.