Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net +135. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,360–5,568 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 12:39
5,524
-8
12 Sept 2026, 02:36
5,532
+8
7 Sept 2026, 16:41
5,524
-10
2 Sept 2026, 23:05
5,534
-2
30 Aug 2026, 16:14
5,536
-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:15
5,544
+32
24 Aug 2026, 10:05
5,512
-24
20 Aug 2026, 09:24
5,536
-6
17 Aug 2026, 19:18
5,542
+44
14 Aug 2026, 07:07
5,498
+45
10 Aug 2026, 20:43
5,453
+69
7 Aug 2026, 17:03
5,384
-5
7 Aug 2026, 09:48
5,389
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 10s
Average length
1m 33s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
206 reactions across 21 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
58
28.2%
❤
50
24.3%
👌
46
22.3%
👍
44
21.4%
😁
4
1.94%
🤝
2
0.971%
❤🔥
1
0.485%
👀
1
0.485%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 21 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zombietrafficc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Эксперимент с фанкой. Который обрушил мою цену лида в салат)
В чем была суть? 👀
С этой фанки заливалось другое гео на протяжении 2 недель.
Как видно на скрине цена в среднем была около 9$ за лид) но потом я думаю мне не хватает фанок и одна с моих трастовых и заполненных фанок в работе) а переделаю я её под другое гео запущу тест на другое гео и как раз посмотрю что будет с этой кампанией) типа н…
КИЕВ, ГОТОВЬСЯ. AFFILIATE-ИНДУСТРИЯ ВОЗВРАЩАЕТСЯ В ОФЛАЙН.
15 сентября Conversion Forum объединит performance- и affiliate-индустрию на одном из самых ожидаемых бизнес-событий этой осени.
1000+ участников
20+ спикеров
50+ брендов
5 вертикалей
1 DAY. REAL DEALS.
Founders, media buyers, advertisers, affiliate networks и C-level — люди, с которыми стоит познакомиться сегодня, чтобы завтра вместе строить бизнес.
На сц…
🇨🇦 Canada is live - готовы к новым запускам?
Новое ГЕО уже открыто, и оно определенно заслуживает места в ваших следующих тестах!
Канада сочетает высокий потенциал, качественную аудиторию и стабильный спрос - именно поэтому к ней сейчас приковано столько внимания.
ГЕО уже доступно на бренде VOX - не упускайте возможность протестировать одним из первых.
➡ Регистрируйтесь на сайте Traffic Cake, подключайте Канаду …
Что из новостей по нашему любимому арбитражу и ФБ)
1. Цукер тестирует оплату рекламы в USDC - уже тестируют в закрытом доступе но судя по всему будет переход на массового потребителя)
2. Европа берется за регуляцию всего и вся связанного с ИИ , особенно это чувствуется в нутре ибо как опытный нутровик могу заявить, что нутра паразитирует на публичных личностях и ни один более менее креатив без этого уже не…
Обстановка в ФБ за 15 секунд) сделал для вас видеообзор основанный на реальных событиях)
Наш чат ✅
🧟♂ Закрытая приватка
Автоматизированный спай-сервис Claude +SpytrendMCP. Ты чилишь, ИИ фармит креативы
Купил 20 ого числа 30 автиков и 6 БМ , выжило на данный момент 2 БМ и сумарно 4 авторега) автореги и БМы брал у разных селлеров но картина печальная анивей , самая частая причина банов - автоматизация , проверка документов ( новинка от цукера )
Бьет ли это по морали) определенно , но мне похуй я открою антик и привяжу еще 30 автиков , я ж медиабайер нахуй)
Как грится всем классного понедельника)
Наш ча…
Гембловики к вашему вниманию) GAMBLING PARTNERS - готовая платформа для твоей работы
Заливай траффик и получай максимум конверсии - платформа выдает показатели выше, чем у любого конкурента, попробуй и убедись сам
💎 В чем преимущество GAMBLING PARTNERS для байеров?
Выплаты 80% - получай максимум с траффика, ECOM-платежка под весь мир - платежка универсальная и не отвалиться в самый неудобный момент. Куча л…
Валидность теста, как исключить факторы которые искажают общую картину
Думаю ни для кого не секрет что креатив = таргет для ФБ) есть несколько доработок которые как по мне могут повысить шанс крео на успех ⤵️
1️⃣Качественный и нормальный перевод , в целом делается двумя нейронками которые вам нравятся в паре, одна нейронка точиться чисто на оценку переводов , а вторая делать переводы с учетом правок с пе…
Вроде как ФБ попустило, за этим 7 дней значительно вырос апрув да и в целом связки начали работать как будто бы)
У вас шо как обстановка?
*на скрине 5 разных связок на 5 разных гео
Наш чат ✅
🧟♂ Закрытая приватка
Автоматизированный спай-сервис Claude +SpytrendMCP. Ты чилишь, ИИ фармит креативы
Новый вид "банов" типа пройди вериф и снимем ограничения)
Кто то сталкивался, знаете мб как контрить эту хрень?
Наш чат ✅
🧟♂ Закрытая приватка
Автоматизированный спай-сервис Claude +SpytrendMCP. Ты чилишь, ИИ фармит креативы
Тактики и стратегии в арбитраже) 📱
Как я к этом пришел, немного контекста)🌐
Недавно я немного залип в третий Варкрафт поставил АИ ботам и они меня выносят, очень неудобно против них играть, я обычно играю для души, там какой то одной страткой + микро контроль у меня уебский, а бот с АИ сразу начинает играть контрпиками, я там делаю пехотинцев он нахуярит химер, я играю за эльфов делаю лучниц, он сука д…
🔥5👌4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @zombietrafficc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ШО, АЗАРТНИЙ? @sho_azartny · 126,904 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zombie Traffic” (@zombietrafficc), 5,524 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zombietrafficc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.