3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,686–3,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 00:30
3,688
-9
7 Aug 2026, 06:06
3,697
-2
6 Aug 2026, 08:36
3,699
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 3,688 subscribers
Avg views / post
424
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
17 (16 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
6,784
Reactions total
85
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
82 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
40
48.8%
🔥
26
31.7%
👍
15
18.3%
🤩
1
1.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👀🌷
▫️подготовка к экзаменам
👀иностранные языки
👀каналы студентов , учёба в вузах
🤩каналы репетиторов
полезная информация , статьи
🤩поступление за границу
Добавить папку
Всё самое интересное и развивающее — теперь в одном месте на вашем экране.
Успейте добавить, пока ссылка активна:
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
https://t.me/addlist/rifmwCPD0vM2M2Ji
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Ведёте канал и хотите поучаствовать в следующей папке? - пиш…
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Ребятааааа!
Я вернулась с вождения и я снова в полном восторге, возбуждении, волнении и еще целом спектре чувств 💫
Спасибо инструктору, который с первого же занятия посадил меня ЗА РУЛЬ ПО ГОРОДУ!
(Сегодня было второе занятие)
И я САМА крутила руль и нажимала педали 🔥
А сегодня это ощущалось еще свободнее и осознаннее. Сегодня моего внимания хватало уже и на знаки и чтоб посмотреть в зеркала перед перестроением …
🔥23❤7
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Мы начали тренажер по фразовым!
Сегодня вышло первое задание, реакцию на которое вы видите ☝🏻.
В тренажере я помогаю вам выучить слова, понять их значение, привожу ассоциации свои, подтягиваю образы, примеры и вам становится все ясно. Приходит полное понимание) и заучивать ничего не приходится.
Круто?
А то.
А вам предлагаю 5 фразовых из тренажера. Они достаточно популярные в речи.
Ваша задача - их угадать.
…
❤3
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Сверяемся с моим вариантом перевода
1. The boy ran up to mom.
2. The girl stepped aside.
3. I put the book away.
4. She sorted out the things.
5. We ate up all the pie.
6. He drank up the coffee.
❤4🔥2
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
вы проголосовали за повтор задания, но без усложнения.
Ок!
Переводим 👇🏻
Только напомню:
❌ не пользуемся переводчиками
✅ стараемся использовать для каждого выделенного глагола фразовый, не простой.
1. Мальчик подбежал к маме.
2. Девочка отошла в сторону.
3. Я убрала книгу на полку.
4. Она разложила вещи по местам
5. Мы съели весь пирог
6. Он выпил кофе
❤5
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤3
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Итак!
По вашим ответам вижу: с половиной вы справились хорошо. А вот в 5,6,7 предложениях единицы смогли образовать фразовый.
Наблюдаем, как можно «докрутить» эти предложения
1. Come into the room and close up the door.
2. I’ll pick you up at school.
3. Turn around/turn back
4. Come UP the window (а казалось бы, какой здесь модно фразовый?😎) and look OUT (мы же на улицу смотрим)
5. Put up the picture on the wall
6…
❤5🔥1
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Translate (все уровни, даже А1 пробует!)
1. Зайди в комнату и закрой дверь.
2. Я заберу тебя у школы в 4.
3. Развернись — ты идёшь не в ту сторону.
4. Подойди к окну и посмотри на улицу.
5. Повесь картину на стену.
6. Выбери красное яблоко.
7. Дети выбежали из школы.
8. Он просто вошёл и сел.
👍7🤩1
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
такие таблички с фразовыми работают? (Работают = вы после них четко разбираетесь в глаголе и используете его в речи)
Какой ваш опыт работы с ними?
Что работает для вас?
👍1
Signed Zoia_english разговорный английский, языковой коуч
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @zoiaENGLISH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 254,838 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНГЛИЙСКИЙ РАЗГОВОРНЫЙ” (@zoiaENGLISH), 3,688 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zoiaENGLISH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
