Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for zodiac

Channel

zodiac

@zodiac_tut

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

311subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002646609312
TypeChannel
Username@zodiac_tut
DescriptionДегенерат на Кухне Чатик - https://t.me/zodiac_pechataet X - https://x.com/0x_zodiac
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zodiac_tut

Growth

3117 Aug 2026, 15:23 — 311 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:46 — 311 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:238 Aug 2026, 07:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 310–312 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:46311no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:23311first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
246
Videos
4
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4333.9%
😁3829.9%
🔥3225.2%
👍97.09%
custom 583261468803413157132.36%
🤔10.787%
🤡10.787%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2025 to 18 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2025, 18:44 UTC909 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На пассиве можно делегировать $SOL валидатору BULK. Идет фарм поинтов, которые позже конвертнут в токены, плюс доходность в соланке. Они даже репостят Дудаса, который пишет про токен за поинты. Команда пилит свой perp-dex который пока еще не запущен для паблика. В дискорде можно фармить роли. В проект занесло много смартов, так что грех не сделать пару кликов. Адрес валидатора - BULKzVM41iAvQZfL34vxqdsYwEYH9mJAJy

4

27 Oct 2025, 12:58 UTC≈1,040 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока самый непонятный сейл с точки зрения раздачи аллок. Даже у многих инфлов, которые делали сквады, меняли ники и устраивали кучу бесплатного маркетоса, тоже мимо. NFT не помогла, ликва не помогла, шилл не помог. Кто блять получил аллоку и за что?

custom 58326146880341315711

24 Oct 2025, 13:21 UTC≈1,120 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ксеры теперь поняли горький опыт криптанов. Мы-то знаем, что если монеты начинают печатать, то цена идет к нулю. Даешь доступные цены на скинчики. Скоро будем все бегать с ножами и в перчатках.

5

18 Oct 2025, 16:21 UTC≈2,590 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Solana Seeker szn Короче, я лично пропустил, что на телефоне уже несколько недель трекается активность, которая будет считаться для дропа токена $SKR. Если вы тоже особо не в теме, то суть следующая. Мы должны ежедневно юзать телефон, тыкать экосистемные апки и набивать время активности. В идеале • делать от 3 ончейн транз в день, стейк, свап, минт и т.д. • время от времени скачивать новые апки и взаимодействовать

🔥31

16 Oct 2025, 12:42 UTC970 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Henlo Хочу вставить свои 5 копеек по сейлу Momentum. Первое и самое важное, оценка 250–350 млн FDV вообще не стоит этого проекта. Даже 100% разлок на TGE не сильно меняет ситуацию. Sui сейчас как экосистема никому не нужна, а перед нами обычный декс. Ну будет у них лаунчпад и RWA, ну и что? Экосистемные токены тоже мёртвые. Мне кажется, они как-то наебут с самим дропом, сделают локи и вестинги, судя по утилити их

👍32

10 Oct 2025, 22:36 UTC924 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что там ваш атом, в стейкинге?

😁9

9 Oct 2025, 18:25 UTC≈1,240 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Последний раз участвовал в IFO на Pancake в 22 году. Залочил $30, получил аллоку на $1 в wombat и словил −99% на токене, ещё и CAKE отдал. Тут тоже намечается буллиш сейл: • в названии bridge, по факту ИИ агенты, зачем там bridge не понял • в партнёрах указаны Yahoo Finance и прочие серьезные СМИ • на сайте картинка ракеты, значит будет ракета • цена за токен $0.008, ждем по баксу В общем по этому дип ресерчу буду

😁6🤔1🤡1

9 Oct 2025, 13:33 UTC382 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Готовы проверять свои миллионы?

😁13

8 Oct 2025, 18:47 UTC≈1,200 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Та давай уже!!

custom 58326146880341315712

8 Oct 2025, 16:13 UTC916 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Гении, которые в награды прошлого года раздали токены ИИ-свиньи, наконец-то решили выпускать токен, а ещё и сейлом на 10% токеномики, надеюсь до конца 2032 года. Хотят сделать свою бету на Plasma, создать свой необанк, но кому это нахуй надо, дайте дроп.

😁72

8 Oct 2025, 12:21 UTC879 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ожидания сбылись. Чекаю чатики, всем раздают копеечные аллоки. Вчера ещё хотел написать, что ждём аллоку на $10. И вот вопрос, зачем это вообще нужно? Люди закидывают деньги, чтобы получить такое, еще и с разлоками? Формат сейла надо менять, лучше дать юзерам проекта нормальную аллоку или сделать лотерейные билеты на удачу, но не на $10, камон. Вчера также вышли крупные новости про инвест в Polymarket, это подливае

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zodiac_tut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 886,473 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“zodiac” (@zodiac_tut), 311 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zodiac_tut.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.