Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝒁𝒂𝒗𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒌 𝒏𝒂 𝑷𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒐𝒏𝒆🪐

@znpluton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003933995008
TypeChannel
Username@znpluton
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/znpluton

Growth

196197196.57 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 197 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:33 — 197 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:50 — 196 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:457 Aug 2026, 10:50
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–197 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 10:50196-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:33197no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:45197first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
99.7%
avg views ÷ 196 subscribers
Avg views / post
195
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,954
Reactions total421
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

421 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥15837.5%
🔥9823.3%
😭5513.1%
😈358.31%
💋225.23%
🌭184.28%
🍌122.85%
🤗102.38%
💯81.90%
👻40.95%
🙈10.238%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 421reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC111 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как же я ненавижу Тикток. Думаю, уже можно прощаться ✋

😭16

6 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC114 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чимин - моя самая красивая зависимость от прекрасного 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍

🌭15❤‍🔥8💋5🤗2🙈1

5 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC244 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

— Не смотри на меня так… я ведь могу неправильно понять. — А если правильно? — Тогда ты слишком долго собираешься с духом. #jikook

❤‍🔥37🔥16😈14

4 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC180 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Я ведь не просил у жизни многого..Я просто хотел тебя. Хотел просыпаться рядом, ворчать, когда ты снова оставляешь кружку на столе, спорить из-за ерунды, а потом всё равно засыпать рядом с тобой. Хотел однажды увидеть твои седые волосы и смеяться, что ты постарел раньше меня. А теперь я стою здесь и понимаю, что всё самое важное для нас осталось в будущем, которого больше никогда не будет. Я до сих пор иногда поворач

😭36❤‍🔥7🔥6

4 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC242 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из глубины воды - в мою ленту 🌊🪷

❤‍🔥24💯5🍌4

3 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC197 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Когда родители решили стать семьей, никто не спросил Чимина и Чонгука, готовы ли они стать братьями. Для Чимина это был шанс обрести близкого человека. Для Чонгука- начало жизни, в которой он будет ненавидеть своего сводного брата. 10 лет они жили под одной крышей. 10 лет Чонгук отталкивал Чимина, грубил ему и делал вид, что ненавидит его всем сердцем. Но стоило Чимину начать проводить время с девушками, как тщательн

🔥27❤‍🔥10🤗4💋1

3 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC198 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⋆ ࣪. JIKOOKִ ۫ ⁎ @m_arr_o 💋

❤‍🔥36💋9🔥4🤗4😭3

2 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC166 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @faceless_nnVideo

#чигуки ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️🖤

❤‍🔥26🔥15💋6😈3

2 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC290 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Желаю развратного воскресенья 🫶 #jikook

🔥30❤‍🔥9🍌8🌭3😈2💋1

1 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC212 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

My bf’s so possessive 🫦

😈16👻4💯3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @znpluton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 237,134 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒁𝒂𝒗𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒌 𝒏𝒂 𝑷𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒐𝒏𝒆🪐” (@znpluton), 196 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znpluton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.