Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Знак Фуд

Channel

Знак Фуд

@znakfood

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

526subscribers

+260 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001619105073
TypeChannel
Username@znakfood
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/znakfood

Growth

2665263966 August 2026 — 266 subscribers7 August 2026 — 266 subscribers14 August 2026 — 526 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +260. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227–565 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:36526+260
7 Aug 2026, 00:32266no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:06266first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 526 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total822
Reactions total114
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7734.8%
😁2410.9%
🔥2310.4%
🍓177.69%
custom 5359317804640120081135.88%
👍135.88%
😍125.43%
custom 535948213008886683094.07%
❤‍🔥73.17%
💘73.17%
🤪41.81%
custom 535943737652964123431.36%
🤗31.36%
🤩31.36%
🥰20.905%
10.452%
👌10.452%
😎10.452%
🤔10.452%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC60 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Но с капучинатором будет проще, конечно 😅

😁11🍓2😍1😎1

1 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC86 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🆘 Объявляем сбор. Если этот ролик наберёт 100 лайков, мы отправим нашего эсэмэмщика на курсы по монтажу.

19😁8👍6🔥2🤔1

30 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC100 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🍓 Основа со вкусом спелой клубники и освежающим послевкусием базилика. ☕️ Идеально сочетается с мытыми сортами кофе, например: — Мексика Чиапас. — Эфиопия Лиму грейд 2. 📊 КБЖУ (на 100 г): — Калорийность: 415.50 ккал. — Белки: 0.40 г. — Жиры: 6.30 г. — Углеводы: 89.80 г. Доступно для всех желающих на нашем официальном сайте 🫶🏻

🍓63🤗21

27 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC106 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Без лишних слов: просто работаем над тем, чтобы ваше утро было бодрым. Желаем вам продуктивной недели и отличного настроения! ☕️

custom 535931780464012008173🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC129 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Фраппучино «Цветущая яблоня» 🌸🍏 Сохраняйте рецепт 👇🏻 Ингредиенты: - Ванильное мороженое — 90 г. - Молоко — 180 мл. - Основа «Цветущая яблоня» — 10 г. - Эспрессо — 2 порции. - Посыпка «Клюква». - Сушёные бутоны жасмина для украшения. 💚 Приготовление: 1. Поместите в чашу блендера ванильное мороженое, молоко, две порции эспрессо и основу «Цветущая яблоня». 2. Взбейте до однородной, нежной консистенции. 3. Перелейте н

custom 53594821300888668307🤩3💘2

22 Jul 2026, 07:37 UTC127 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Холодный зелёный чай с тропической сливочной пеной 🍍🥥 Напиток сочетает терпкость зелёного чая, деликатную кислинку тропических нот и мягкую сливочную текстуру. ⏳ Время приготовления — 5 минут. Ингредиенты: 🥛 молоко любой жирности (можно альтернативное) — 200 мл; 🍵 сухая основа «Зелёный чай с жасмином» — 10 г; 🧊 лёд — полный стакан; 🥛 сливки 33 % — 50 г; 🍍 основа «Ванильная маракуйя» — 7 г; 🍓 посыпка «Клубника» —

❤‍🔥7🔥3custom 53593178046401200812custom 53594821300888668302

21 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC110 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А мы тут в розыгрыш от фестиваля «ЧАШКА» попали 😍 Как прияяятно! Будет ещё приятнее, если вы выиграете клёвые призы 🎆

3💘2👍1

20 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC104 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

А что, если бы прямо сейчас нужно было выбрать один момент, в котором вы будете вечно? Какой это будет момент? Пишите в комментариях 💫

4🔥2🥰2

17 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC139 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🥭 Как готовить аэрокано «Манговый сорбет»? Ингредиенты: 🧊 Лёд — 170 г. ☕ Эспрессо — 2 порции. 🥭 Основа «Манговый сорбет» — 10 г. ✨ Посыпка из сушёного манго. Рецепт: ◦ В питчер добавляем лёд, основу и эспрессо. ◦ Взбиваем паром до температуры 65° до растворения льда и образования пены. ◦ Переливаем в стакан для подачи и украшаем сверху напиток посыпкой. ✨ Вуаля — готово! Приятного аппетита и наслаждения каждым гло

🍓73🔥3🤗1

15 Jul 2026, 07:07 UTC143 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Наша миксолог Настя не только разрабатывает новые вкусы, но и снимает для вас рецепты напитков. Скоро всё покажем 😉 ❤️ – если ждёте!

14custom 53594373765296412343🍓2

13 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC147 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Посыпка «Взрывной попкорн» для напитков и десертов 🤤🍿 Пищевая ценность на 100 г.: Белки – 0; Жиры – 0; Углеводы – 91,8. на 100 г.: 383,9 ккал/1607,3 кДж. Состав: взырвная карамель (сахар, глюкозный сироп, углекислый газ Е290, лактоза), мальтодестрин, ароматизаторы, пищевые красители (Е555, Е172, Е171).

7🔥5👍4

10 Jul 2026, 04:58 UTC162 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Две вещи, которые нам интересны в пятницу: 1. Хиханьки. 2. Хаханьки. А что интересует вас, пишите в комментариях. За самый весёлый вариант — воздушный поцелуй от Влада 😘 @znakcoffee31

😁5🔥4🤪4👍2💘2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @znakfood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 278,700 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Знак Фуд” (@znakfood), 526 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/znakfood.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.