Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

злокич 𓆩 𓆪

@zloki4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

270subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001924104292
TypeChannel
Username@zloki4
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zloki4

Growth

270271270.58 Aug 2026, 13:00 — 271 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 12:33 — 270 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 13:009 Aug 2026, 12:33
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 270–271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:33270-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:00271first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.3%
avg views ÷ 270 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
1 post measured
Reaction rate
39.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held18 (14 April 202629 July 2026)
Views total106
Reactions total42
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

869 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 592031103968084429419122.0%
custom 533916876872984575415317.6%
custom 529651403546902136912314.2%
custom 5393539863536501470819.32%
custom 5294500559095626022799.09%
custom 5222369929138839104455.18%
custom 5192749824620928315384.37%
custom 5224638152907464230293.34%
💋293.34%
custom 5258258233482571261273.11%
custom 5967821405268482323151.73%
❤‍🔥111.27%
🔥111.27%
custom 542699961727742297691.04%
custom 537964460065688194680.921%
60.69%
💘50.575%
custom 529673094420237262730.345%
🆒30.345%
🌚20.23%
1 further kind10.115%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 869reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,280
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 18 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
1,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zloki4. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 April 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 21:59 UTC106 views42 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @seo_tochkacomPhoto

Феофан скрывающий боль

custom 522236992913883910417custom 52246381529074642309custom 59203110396808442947custom 51927498246209283153custom 529450055909562602221💋1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC260 views53 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за арт родной 😭 Кто не шарит, на картинке мой фан-сегментыш, рефы к которому я еще не нарисовал из-за арт блока, так что пока t e r p i m 🌟

custom 529651403546902136922custom 533916876872984575414custom 5920311039680844294121💋1🔥1custom 51927498246209283151custom 52945005590956260221

9 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC258 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фьючер как обычно балует 🤩

custom 539353986353650147021custom 529651403546902136915❤‍🔥112🌚2custom 51927498246209283152custom 59203110396808442942💋1

9 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTC233 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @iratufag2Photo

А кому это сегодня 67 годиков @zloki4

custom 533916876872984575417custom 51927498246209283157custom 52965140354690213697custom 52223699291388391042💋1🔥1custom 52945005590956260221custom 59203110396808442941

8 Jul 2026, 23:27 UTC220 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @seo_tochkacomPhoto

🌟 Хэппи бездей дотторик для @zloki4 😳😳😳 #арт

custom 522236992913883910420custom 529651403546902136911custom 533916876872984575410custom 52246381529074642302custom 59203110396808442942🔥1custom 51927498246209283151

8 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC203 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kchachaPhoto

с днём рождения злочесть 🎉

custom 529450055909562602222custom 529651403546902136912custom 539353986353650147072🔥1custom 51927498246209283151custom 53391687687298457541custom 59203110396808442941

10 Jun 2026, 20:31 UTC439 views44 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Шёл хз какой день моей любви к Ро 💕

custom 592031103968084429417custom 533916876872984575411custom 51927498246209283158🆒2custom 52246381529074642302custom 52965140354690213692💘1custom 52223699291388391041

27 May 2026, 20:04 UTC605 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Всë, можно удалять игру😎

custom 533916876872984575420custom 52945005590956260229custom 59203110396808442949custom 51927498246209283152custom 52965140354690213692custom 52223699291388391041custom 52246381529074642301custom 53935398635365014701

21 May 2026, 20:57 UTC708 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 522463815290746423014custom 53391687687298457547custom 52945005590956260224custom 52223699291388391043custom 52965140354690213692custom 53935398635365014702custom 59203110396808442942

21 May 2026, 20:57 UTC664 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чуваки, отмучался, сделал стикер и эмоджи пак по ласт сюжетке в гш, кому надо можете брать 🫐

custom 533916876872984575423custom 592031103968084429411custom 52582582334825712618🔥2💘1🆒1custom 52223699291388391041custom 52246381529074642301

29 Apr 2026, 13:17 UTC767 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то гений миллиардер плейбой филантроп решил соизволить посетить своего лучшего кентика 🤩🤩

custom 592031103968084429439custom 533916876872984575416custom 525825823348257126110custom 52945005590956260223custom 52967309442023726273🔥1custom 52965140354690213691

28 Apr 2026, 06:27 UTC660 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

4 всадника апокалипсиса

custom 592031103968084429421custom 53935398635365014709custom 52582582334825712617💘3custom 52965140354690213692custom 54269996172774229762custom 51927498246209283151custom 52945005590956260221

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @zloki4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 225,420 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“злокич 𓆩 𓆪” (@zloki4), 270 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zloki4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.