Channel
@zitatederschande
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001842138171 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zitatederschande |
| Description | Eine Plakat-Aktion der Initiative „Dialog für unsere Zukunft!“ Freiberg. - gegen das Vergessen - zum NachDENKlich machen - um ins Gespräch zu kommen #Menü |
| Created | 5 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zitatederschande |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 109 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 109 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
18 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 5.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 5.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2025 to 27 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Die Aufklärungsarbeit über das menschenverachtende Corona-Unrecht geht weiter. Deshalb sind meine lieben Schild-Bürger unterwegs nach Freiberg. Dort werden sie unsere sächsischen Mitstreiter bei ihrer Plakataktion "Zitate der Schande" unterstützen. Ich wünsche euch allen viele gute Gespräche und spannende Begegnungen. Liebe Grüße Silvia 🫶
👍3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5
Zitate der Schande Ein Ort, der uns daran erinnert, dass wir nie vergessen sollten, welches Unrecht während Corona passiert ist. Wir werden auf keinen Fall schweigen oder uns den Mund verbieten lassen! Was der Verfassungsschutz versucht, um uns Aufklärer schlecht aussehen zu lassen, prallt an uns ab! Wir haben alle Fakten, und die RKI-Protokolle beweisen es. Deshalb kümmern wir uns selbst darum, die Wahrheit ans L…
Nach dem „Urteil der Schande“ (noch nicht rechtskräftig - Bericht folgt) welches gegen mich am Montag in Schweinfurt ausgesprochen wurde - ist vor der Plakataktion „Zitate der Schande“ in Bamberg. Mit der lieben Dana, einer Mitstreiterin aus Bamberg, werden wir gemeinsam die Plakate ausstellen. Ein Mahnmal sowie ein Stück deutsche Zeitgeschichte gegen das Vergessen dieses menschenverachtenden Corona-Unrechts. All…
❤1
Nach meiner Verhandlung / Apollo News ist vor dem #ERINNERN und der #AUFKLÄRUNG! Mit der lieben Dana, einer Mitstreiterin aus Bamberg, werden wir gemeinsam die Plakataktion „Zitate der Schande“ in Bamberg ausstellen. Ein Mahnmal sowie ein Stück deutsche Zeitgeschichte gegen das Vergessen dieses menschenverachtenden Corona-Unrechts. Alle Fakten liegen auf dem Tisch, und die RKI-Protokolle beweisen es. Nehmen wir d…
Apollo-News hat dankenswerterweise den Fall aufgegriffen, wegen dessen unsere liebe Mitstreiterin Silvia aus Coburg am 12. Mai vor dem Schweinfurter Amtsgericht steht (nähere Infos 👉 hier und hier)…
Am 12. Mai werden wir Silvia in der Verhandlung in Schweinfurt unterstützen. Fortsetzung folgt…
🙏1
(3/3) Die Polizei stellte fest: Es ist zu sehen, »dass Herr Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach den „Hitlergruß" zeigt.« Die Staatsanwaltschaft ermittelte. Was dabei herausgekommen ist, darf vor der Verhandlung nicht öffentlich gemacht werden. CORRECTIV stellte in einem sogenannte Faktencheck fest: »Nein, Karl Lauterbach zeigte NICHT den Hitlergruß.« Justizapparat Schweinfurt: Die Staatsanwaltschaft erwirkte einen…
(2/3) Konkret geht es um dieses Plakat. Darauf ist NICHT zu sehen, dass Karl Lauterbach den Hitlergruß zeigt. Darauf ist lediglich zu erkennen, dass er den Arm hebt. Für ein Gestikulieren in vergleichbaren Situationen werden politisch missliebige Personen von unserer Justiz gnadenlos verfolgt und kriminalisiert. Und offensichtlich ebenso jene, die genau diesen Sachverhalt thematisieren und dokumentieren. Dabei we…
(1/3) Die Bekämpfung der Meinungsfreiheit schreitet weiter voran. Auch unsere Plakataktion ist davon betroffen. Eine umfassende Erläuterung dazu in der Stellungnahme… Quellen: 👉 die Kundgebung in Schweinfurt 👉 Faktencheck CORRECTIV 👉 rechtliche Einordnung in der WELT
Ihr Lieben, ein weiteres Kapitel, welches an Absurdität nicht zu überbieten ist, öffnet sich für mich. ‼️Gerichtsverhandlung in Schweinfurt‼️ - Verwendung von verfassungsfeindlichen Kennzeichen terroristischer Organisationen - 🗓: Montag, 12.05.2025 ⏰: 15 Uhr 📍: Amtsgericht Schweinfurt Sitzungssaal 16, EG Rüfferstr. 1 Prozessbeobachter 👀 Vertreter der Presse 📰 sind herzlich eingeladen! Was …
Corona-Pressespiegel. Wir vergessen nicht. Denen Gehör schenken, die durch die Pandemie oder durch die durchgeführte Gentherapie geschädigt wurden und Hilfsangebote kennen lernen. Miteinander reden. Die Ausstellung findet vom 26. - 30.03.2025 von 18-21 Uhr in der Königsgasse 2 in Frankweiler statt. Bitte beim Friedhof parken. Den Auftakt macht Marlies Spuhler am Mittwoch, 26.3. um 19 Uhr mit ihrer Präsentation "Er…
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @zitatederschande. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 606,939 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zitate der Schande” (@zitatederschande), 109 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zitatederschande.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.