Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Преступный жигулевск👀

@zhygulev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002927367348
TypeChannel
Username@zhygulev
DescriptionCr: @orenguice2 коллабы✅ трейды✅ коммишки❌ реквесты✅(писать в анонку) щп https://t.me/+93hgllcZz1YxZTZi анонка @DED_NA_ZHYGULIanon_bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zhygulev

Growth

1667 Aug 2026, 05:03 — 166 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 16:01 — 166 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:038 Aug 2026, 16:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 16:01166no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:03166first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.3%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
104
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (1 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,035
Reactions total254
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,430
Videos
16
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51973962061410835144818.9%
custom 53123495197598192994718.5%
custom 54360652066125578112710.6%
custom 5382313506219525662249.45%
custom 5287577243613167147187.09%
custom 5352691730959329817176.69%
176.69%
custom 5255899677961788637145.51%
93.54%
💘93.54%
🤩62.36%
🥰62.36%
custom 521332033855687008251.97%
❤‍🔥41.57%
🙏20.787%
💋10.394%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 10 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhygulev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC43 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

tw/cw: nsfw ллл @nsfwdodask

custom 54360652066125578116custom 53526917309593298174🥰3🤩1🙏1custom 52133203385568700821

7 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC65 views29 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

tw/cw: nsfw нуууу я в основном запросы от асковых своих няшечек рисовал сегоднн

custom 53123495197598192999custom 53526917309593298177custom 51973962061410835145custom 543606520661255781121💘1🤩1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC76 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

хорошемти будуь

custom 51973962061410835149custom 52558996779617886379custom 52875772436131671473custom 5382313506219525662321💘1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC88 views22 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

вместо рисования чего-то адекватного рисую мемасики

custom 531234951975981929911custom 52133203385568700824custom 52558996779617886374💘21

5 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC97 views25 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

забежал к французу в магму пукнул и убежал

custom 519739620614108351413custom 52875772436131671474custom 535269173095932981731💋1custom 53123495197598192991custom 53823135062195256621custom 54360652066125578111

4 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC126 views25 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

не рисуетсс особо пока

custom 519739620614108351411custom 53823135062195256626custom 528757724361316714751🤩1custom 54360652066125578111

3 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC146 views27 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

tw/cw: suggestive тыкаю писей в попу @nsfwdodask

custom 531234951975981929914🥰32custom 52875772436131671472custom 53526917309593298172custom 54360652066125578112💘1custom 53823135062195256621

3 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC123 views27 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

tw/cw: nsfw всякое разное

custom 519739620614108351410custom 53123495197598192995custom 54360652066125578113❤‍🔥2custom 52875772436131671472custom 538231350621952566221💘1

2 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC127 views30 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

а о я вчера бедангелов скечил

custom 54360652066125578111275❤‍🔥2💘2custom 53123495197598192992

1 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC144 views24 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ууу женщины юри слоп

custom 538231350621952566211custom 531234951975981929953🤩21💘1custom 52875772436131671471

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zhygulev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 910,670 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Преступный жигулевск👀” (@zhygulev), 166 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhygulev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.