🚀 WhatsApp 广播超链群发正式起量! 什么是广播群发?请看图,100%真机发送。 定制昵称+头像=转化提升100% 全球线路稳定覆盖,高落地、高进线、稳定输出,告别传统群发低触达! 🌍 全球可发|⚡️ 快速触达|📈 超高落地 真正以进线效果说话,有量直接上!

Channel
主任出海、专注ws
@zhurenchuhai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
617subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 30 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002183347076 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhurenchuhai |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhurenchuhai |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:55 | 617 | -17 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 634 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.24%
- avg views ÷ 617 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 20.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (12 May 2026 – 30 September 2026) |
| Views total | 20 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
14 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
这是一条特别的介绍!! 🔥 真机矩阵 WhatsApp 群发|专注美国市场 🇺🇸 美国区精准触达,真机矩阵运营,稳定落地 📈 落地率 90%+,整体进线表现优于传统 BM 蓝标渠道 🎯 特别适合股民、投资、兼职引流等项目 ⚡️ 量不做大,主打稳定、持续、长期合作 📌 支持每日稳定发送,有量即可持续承接 不吹数据,只看实际效果,有需求可以直接对接测试。
❤2
主任出海、专注ws pinned «💥 大涅槃风控之后,能稳定跑的资源越来越少! WS 超链机房稳定发送中 ✔️ 稳定进线 ✔️ 全球覆盖 ✔️ 无需排队 ✔️ 线路稳定 ✔️ 支持持续跑量 不是拼运气,拼的是资源和线路。 📩 有需求直接联系 @teke007d,先测试再上量。»
💥 大涅槃风控之后,能稳定跑的资源越来越少! WS 超链机房稳定发送中 ✔️ 稳定进线 ✔️ 全球覆盖 ✔️ 无需排队 ✔️ 线路稳定 ✔️ 支持持续跑量 不是拼运气,拼的是资源和线路。 📩 有需求直接联系 @teke007d,先测试再上量。
❤1
为什么别人TG每天都有客户回复? 因为他们不是乱发,而是精准触达。 📊 实测数据: ✔️ 发送353 ✔️ 已读41% ✔️ 回复7% 真正帮助出海企业获客,支持TG批量营销、精准群发。 有兴趣可联系测试。@teke007d
👍1🔥1
tg云控+TG号,单号能打20—40条。号子可以复用。
❤2👍1
tg美国会员号依然坚挺,提前约量
❤1
tg群发已突破风控,有量 单号可发20-40,全球可触达,抱团出海,赚钱回家
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
次天继续发送五条 依然坚挺,美国最新黑科技
美国ws双向打粉黑科技已经初步实现技术突破,期待明天再次复发测试
售前抓信任、挖需求、给价值,不硬推。 售中稳体验、控细节、给安全感。 售后重兑现、解问题、做维护。
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zhurenchuhai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“主任出海、专注ws” (@zhurenchuhai), 617 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhurenchuhai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.