Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ژُوان

Channel

ژُوان

@zhovanine

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

89,338subscribers

-1,816 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001423331533
TypeChannel
Username@zhovanine
Descriptionبا پارتنرت بیا قشنگم 💕
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhovanine

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@zhovanine/175698 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC@Rozhhin1/1943358 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@zhovanine/178606 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC@Rozhhin1/19722518 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@Rozhhin1/19786519 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC@zhovanine/179246 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 20:32 UTC1.002 minutes
@zhovanine/179865 · this entry21 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC@Rozhhin1/19848521 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@zhovanine/182903 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC@Rozhhin1/2015262 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC1.0072 seconds
@zhovanine/184891 · this entry12 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC@Rozhhin1/20351312 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Rozhhin1265 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Rozhhin1 (208–57)
@Lo_v529 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 hoursthis entry (26–3)
@ashghiat16 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.984 dayseven
@g6Z9g11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9913 daysthis entry (8–3)
@Kelipedellll8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.982.0 hoursthis entry (8–0)
@Y6Z9Y8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0010 daysthis entry (5–3)
@huutchaanel6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.975 days@huutchaanel (6–0)
@MyOnsera6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9814 dayseven
@LipsFiery5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.999 daysthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 236 of the 236 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 725 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @zhovanine — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7894,29147,184.57 August 2026 — 91,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 91,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 91,102 subscribers8 August 2026 — 84 subscribers16 August 2026 — 94,291 subscribers17 August 2026 — 94,076 subscribers18 August 2026 — 93,869 subscribers19 August 2026 — 93,719 subscribers20 August 2026 — 93,505 subscribers22 August 2026 — 93,287 subscribers24 August 2026 — 93,018 subscribers25 August 2026 — 92,868 subscribers26 August 2026 — 92,739 subscribers27 August 2026 — 92,644 subscribers28 August 2026 — 92,470 subscribers29 August 2026 — 92,332 subscribers30 August 2026 — 92,222 subscribers31 August 2026 — 92,122 subscribers1 September 2026 — 92,009 subscribers2 September 2026 — 91,872 subscribers3 September 2026 — 91,739 subscribers4 September 2026 — 91,509 subscribers7 September 2026 — 91,155 subscribers10 September 2026 — 90,825 subscribers12 September 2026 — 90,625 subscribers14 September 2026 — 90,471 subscribers16 September 2026 — 90,299 subscribers18 September 2026 — 90,093 subscribers1 October 2026 — 83 subscribers12 October 2026 — 89,179 subscribers14 October 2026 — 89,015 subscribers15 October 2026 — 88,870 subscribers16 October 2026 — 88,768 subscribers17 October 2026 — 88,646 subscribers18 October 2026 — 88,512 subscribers19 October 2026 — 88,395 subscribers20 October 2026 — 88,270 subscribers21 October 2026 — 88,136 subscribers22 October 2026 — 88,059 subscribers23 October 2026 — 87,934 subscribers24 October 2026 — 87,834 subscribers25 October 2026 — 87,737 subscribers26 October 2026 — 87,639 subscribers27 October 2026 — 87,549 subscribers29 October 2026 — 87,472 subscribers30 October 2026 — 87,361 subscribers31 October 2026 — 87,220 subscribers1 November 2026 — 87,122 subscribers2 November 2026 — 78 subscribers8 November 2026 — 89,546 subscribers9 November 2026 — 89,338 subscribers89,3387 August 20269 November 2026
51 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,816. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:4689,338-208
8 Nov 2026, 08:0489,546+89,468
2 Nov 2026, 02:5678-87,044
1 Nov 2026, 01:4987,122-98
31 Oct 2026, 01:5887,220-141
30 Oct 2026, 01:5787,361-111
29 Oct 2026, 04:3887,472-77
27 Oct 2026, 23:0687,549-90
26 Oct 2026, 22:0787,639-98
25 Oct 2026, 21:0987,737-97
24 Oct 2026, 23:1587,834-100
23 Oct 2026, 19:5587,934-125
22 Oct 2026, 17:2888,059-77
21 Oct 2026, 13:4688,136-134
20 Oct 2026, 07:4088,270-125
19 Oct 2026, 07:0888,395-117
18 Oct 2026, 09:1688,512-134
17 Oct 2026, 07:1988,646-122
16 Oct 2026, 07:4688,768-102
15 Oct 2026, 08:5688,870first reading

Engagement

1,345 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.16%
avg views ÷ 89,338 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
413 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
413
of 1,345 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held1,345 (6 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total429,760
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,290
Videos
≈805
Links
≈630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 11s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 44 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 413 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 22:53 UTC77 viewsread 10 November 2026

👍هنوز #بکس‌بت رو امتحان نکردی؟ 💶 ۵۰ دلار بونوس ثبت‌نام 💸 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس اولین واریز 🚀 بازی انفجار، کازینو آنلاین و شرط‌بندی ورزشی، همه در یک پلتفرم! 👍بکس بت، مقصدی نهایی👇 ✅ https://baxbet.com ✅https://t.me/+MHKFJzu-rWFmNzg0

10 Nov 2026, 22:53 UTC75 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

👍 #بکس‌بت فراتر از یک انتخاب از پیش‌بینی مسابقات بزرگ ورزشی تا تجربه بازی‌های کازینویی، بکس‌بت مجموعه‌ای متنوع رو در یک پلتفرم ارائه می‌ده. 🦑 شرط‌بندی زنده ورزشی 🕹 کازینو و بازی انفجار 🤑 ۵۰ دلار بونوس ثبت‌نام 💰 ۱۰۰٪ بونوس اولین واریز 📞 پشتیبانی شبانه‌روزی a19 بکس‌بت؛ تنوعی که دنبالش بودی. https://baxbet.com 🌐کانال تلگرام و جوایز👇 https://t.me/+MHKFJzu-rWFmNzg0

10 Nov 2026, 22:27 UTC42 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

اگه جلوی رلت زبونت بند میاد و نمی‌دونی چطوری دیوونه‌ش کنی… 🔥 اگه تو سکس چت کم میاری و حرفی برای گفتن نداری، اینجا دقیقاً خوراک خودته 🤤🤤 @LOVEEE

10 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTC555 viewsread 10 November 2026

00:00 لاس بزن با دلبری کردن اینطوری دیوونه خودت کن : • صدات بهترین آهنگیه که امروز شنیدم. • هرچی بیشتر می‌شناسمت، کمتر می‌تونم ازت دل بکنم. • با تو بودن یعنی حتی سکوت هم قشنگه. • چشمات دنیای منو قشنگ‌تر می‌کنه. • بدترین جای روزم وقتیه که باید ازت خداحافظی کنم. • کاش می‌شد تو رو به همه نشون بدم ولی دلم نمیاد کسی جز من داشته باشه‌ت.» • اگه بدونی چقدر فکر کردنت قشنگه، هیچوقت از ذهنم بیرون نمیای. • کنار تو بودن هم آرومه…

10 Nov 2026, 19:53 UTC717 viewsread 10 November 2026

امشب خواستم بهت یادآوری کنم : بودنت برام خیلی باارزشه یادت نره من هرشب با فکر تو میخوابم تو همه‌ی آرزوهای منی دوسِت دارم شبت بخیر؛❤️

10 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 10 November 2026

صداش بزن: نیمه‌ی روشنم. نیمه روشنم، یعنی با تو تاریک‌ترین لحظه‌هام هم پر از نور میشه.

10 Nov 2026, 13:47 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 10 November 2026

صداش بزن: دلیل بودنم. دلیل بودنم، یعنی اگه تو نباشی، هیچ دلیلی برای ادامه ندارم.

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,345 posts we hold for @zhovanine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 25 posts on @zhovanine as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
14

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

^
@Nikotniha · 157
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
❥Delbari
@delbari · 403,491
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
『 حـریـم امـن 』
@hariim_amn · 128,704
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
روانشناسی | نبوغ سبز
@Green_Genius · 228,944
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 11 August 2026
کاپل ♥️
@Lov_eu · 49,981
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
My Love ♡
@Loavma · 357,150
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 10 August 2026
اونجا که میگه:
@unja_kee · 441,013
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ژُوان” (@zhovanine), 89,338 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhovanine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.