Channel
@zhisme_ch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002256656108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhisme_ch |
| Description | https://zhisme.com |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhisme_ch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 40 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (14 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 698 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 26.1% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 8.70% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 4.35% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Где это не работает Весь фокус держится на одном допущении: существует дешёвая объективная проверка. Для кода она есть: компилятор, линтер, тесты. Готовая, бесплатная, чужими руками написанная, бери да пользуйся А для «напиши хорошее письмо»? Верификатора нет. Написать его дороже, чем сделать задачу руками. Там харнесс вырождается обратно в промпт «делай хорошо». где уже нужны знания эксперта, который знает что так…
👍2
Крошка сын к отцу пришёл, и спросила кроха: что такое хорошо и что такое плохо? Харнесс, харнесс вероятно, вы уже слышали про это относительно новое понятие. А откуда ноги растут? Ноги растут из тестирования Слово не новое. Test harness термину лет тридцать как: обвязка, которая гоняет код под тестом, кормит его входами, собирает выходы, говорит «прошло / не прошло». Поменяйте «код под тестом» на «модель» и получи…
👍2
нужен и для кода такой инструмент. давеча смотрел один ПР/МР от коллеги: а код был ну такой сомнительный, я пытался вчитаться понять что к чему и как. потратил внушительное время, две чашки кофе, N количество сигарет пока понял что к чему, написал развернутое ревью! А позже другой коллега подходит и говорит "о, а тот нейрослоп это ты получается ревьювил? а я-то спрыгнул, не захотел время тратить. хорош, спасибо!" …
Кто такой ИИ Архитектор? К ИИ инженеру вопросов нет, чувак за зарплату гоняет промпты, здесь все предельно чисто А кто такой этот ИИ Архитектор, такой же гоняющий промпты, но с более дорогой лычкой? Или это человек, который говорит другим какие промпты гонять? Видели вживую таких? Я вот только в линкедыне. Аж правда очень любопытно! Шо за зверь-то такой интересный? Единорог какой-то..
🌭1
а, даже так.. вместо учебников тикитоки с брейнротом, и не только у айтишников астанавитесь!
поговаривают, что нынче зумеры так изучают и познают как в айти вайти ну что ж радостно, что изучают! своеобразно конечно, но все равно радостно
🤓2
Линкедын начал бороться с нейрослопом! Теперь можно давить паразитов на теле читающего общества. А я вот вам картинки сделаль снейрослопил. Нейрослоплю только картинки, все тексты осмысленные, авторские. правда. А в линкедыне всех нейрослоп генераторов забаним тяжелым и увесистым банхамером!
🤨1
если взять и сделать всю работу в приливе сил за сегодня, то что же тогда делать всю оставшуюся неделю?
если хочется как в "AI THEN" с полной подготовкой, то есть оч классный БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ без смс и регистраций курс на ютубе от препода матана и ML. Тут еще до эпохи нейрослопа, и больше именно про ML. Но база что ML что AI (именно про обучение, веса и пр.) одинакова: математика, дискретная математика, теория вероятностей и даже базовое обучение питону огромная рекомендация всем голодным до знаний dUdVstud - название рас…
Photo, posted without a caption
💯2
цитировали в тимс. Радовался.
🤣1
каждый 8 раст программист идентифицирует себя как трансформер. вот вам и прогрессивное, строго-типизированное, очень оптимизированное человечество. думайте..
✍1💊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zhisme_ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@zhisme :: signal over noise” (@zhisme_ch), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhisme_ch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.