Ждем новую локацию в Сезонах?❕
custom 54723465004638768258custom 53665244419352487984custom 54542387723150573744custom 54383650413404570922custom 53368489924687376401

Channel
@zhimolostd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
164subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002208127384 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhimolostd |
| Description | 🌿Лс: @zhimoIostb 🌿 Группа ВК: https://vk.com/zhimolostbrzn 🌿 TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@zhimolostb_ 🌿 Поддержка: 5469 9804 2307 6146 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhimolostd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 164 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:30 | 164 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,404 |
| Reactions total | 210 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
210 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334624139279883059 | 41 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5472346500463876825 | 37 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5336848992468737640 | 26 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5438365041340457092 | 25 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5366524441935248798 | 24 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5235748511747681307 | 19 | 9.05% | |
| custom 5382351070003475249 | 16 | 7.62% | |
| custom 5454238772315057374 | 14 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5803072730446171192 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| custom 5465516548980492747 | 2 | 0.952% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ждем новую локацию в Сезонах?❕
custom 54723465004638768258custom 53665244419352487984custom 54542387723150573744custom 54383650413404570922custom 53368489924687376401
Ну что готовы стать вампирами? 🌟 Как же давно я хотела косплей Крул!! Вы бы знали… это что-то из тех старых гештальтов, когда только начинаешь смотреть аниме 🐰Ph @zhimolostd
custom 53665244419352487988custom 53346241392798830596custom 53823510700034752496custom 54542387723150573741custom 58030727304461711921
По поводу свободных дат для фотосессий! Теперь фоткать могу только на выходных (суббота, воскресенье), поэтому лучше писать заранее. 🤡 На CorGEEK fest 12 сентября буду 🤡
custom 533462413927988305911custom 54723465004638768257custom 53665244419352487984custom 53368489924687376401custom 53823510700034752491custom 54542387723150573741
💫Gachiakuta Риё Рипер ✂️ Уже давно готов отбор, а у меня только нашлось время написать пост! Это уже второй персонаж из этой вселенной, который мне удалось сфоткать. Вайбы прически как у Тето, хаха. ❤️ #cos@zhimolostd
custom 547234650046387682513custom 53346241392798830598custom 53368489924687376405custom 54542387723150573742custom 53665244419352487981custom 53823510700034752491
В этот же день у нас был второй фотосет с Евой. Мы собирались одной компанией дважды, днем спали какими-то передышками, и в итоге я жестко сбила свой режим, теперь живу только по ночам. 😑 И еще я готовлюсь к переезду, пупупу…
custom 53823510700034752498custom 53368489924687376404custom 53346241392798830591custom 54383650413404570921custom 54542387723150573741custom 54723465004638768251
Но несмотря на все обстоятельства, мы все равно смогли пофоткать полчасика в воде! ➖Фурина и Нёвиллет из Фонтейна ➖ Цвет воды, конечно, был такой себе, были какие-то жабьи вайбы, но это все поправим на обработке. Обидно, что мы только расфоткались, я уже думала как посажу их в кувшинки, а случился такой прикол… ☹️
custom 533462413927988305911custom 53368489924687376405custom 54542387723150573744custom 54383650413404570922custom 53665244419352487981custom 54723465004638768251
Надо написать какой-то пост, но я сижу в коридоре с мокрыми грязными штанами и думаю, какой же пиздец только что случился. Сегодня должна была быть ✨волшебная ✨фотосессия в воде на рассвете, а в итоге мы сидели в лесу под вой сирены, взрывы и работу ПВО.
custom 523574851174768130711custom 54723465004638768254custom 53368489924687376403custom 54383650413404570922custom 53346241392798830591
Это была самая страшная фотосессия…
custom 52357485117476813078custom 53368489924687376403custom 53665244419352487982custom 54655165489804927472custom 53346241392798830591
ладно, пора вставать на фотосик
custom 54383650413404570929custom 53665244419352487983custom 58030727304461711923custom 53346241392798830591custom 53368489924687376401custom 54542387723150573741
🌟Honkai: Star Rail🌟 Темнеет, не будем задерживаться ☁️Дань Хэн 🌟md Aranarchik 📱Больше фотографий с этого фотосета можно увидеть в моей группе ВК #cos@zhimolostd
custom 54383650413404570929custom 53368489924687376403custom 54723465004638768253custom 58030727304461711922custom 53346241392798830591custom 53665244419352487981
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @zhimolostd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 96,013 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“жимолость золотистая” (@zhimolostd), 164 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhimolostd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.