Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 42 of the 42 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 305 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 96 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,341–13,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 17:46
13,428
-14
9 Nov 2026, 22:07
13,442
-4
8 Nov 2026, 10:06
13,446
-11
7 Nov 2026, 07:59
13,457
+2
6 Nov 2026, 09:45
13,455
-1
5 Nov 2026, 10:16
13,456
+2
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
13,454
+5
3 Nov 2026, 11:06
13,449
-7
2 Nov 2026, 10:19
13,456
+2
1 Nov 2026, 12:46
13,454
+12
31 Oct 2026, 12:11
13,442
-2
30 Oct 2026, 15:18
13,444
-9
29 Oct 2026, 15:19
13,453
+2
28 Oct 2026, 17:47
13,451
-4
26 Oct 2026, 20:36
13,455
+2
25 Oct 2026, 20:38
13,453
+6
24 Oct 2026, 22:31
13,447
-3
23 Oct 2026, 23:56
13,450
-4
22 Oct 2026, 23:57
13,454
+5
21 Oct 2026, 19:28
13,449
first reading
Engagement
337 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 13,428 subscribers
Avg views / post
590
94 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.713%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
94
of 337 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 92 of 94 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
337 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
55,461
Reactions total
389
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈14,000
Videos
≈2,160
Links
≈9,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 18m
Average length
1m 17s
Measured directly from 61 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,305 reactions across 322 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
538
41.2%
❤
451
34.6%
👎
60
4.60%
🤣
49
3.75%
💔
37
2.84%
🙏
23
1.76%
🔥
22
1.69%
⚡
17
1.30%
😢
13
0.996%
🤬
13
0.996%
🤯
13
0.996%
💯
11
0.843%
🤩
10
0.766%
😐
7
0.536%
👏
6
0.46%
😁
6
0.46%
🎉
4
0.307%
🕊
4
0.307%
🗿
4
0.307%
🫡
3
0.23%
8 further kinds
14
1.07%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 323 of the 337 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,305 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 337 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 94 posts held from the last 30 days (5.32%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
👁️🗨️ اولین مدل تصمیمگیری گوگل با نام Gemini Decision 1 معرفی شد
🔸مدل جدید Gemini Decision 1 میتواند در یک درخواست تا ۱۰۰۰ پرسش را درباره دادههایی شامل متن، تصویر، صوت، ویدیو و فایلهای پیدیاف ارزیابی کند. این ابزار با ارائه امتیاز اطمینان به توسعهدهندگان کمک میکند پروندههای پیچیده را بهسرعت دستهبندی کنند و موارد مبهم را به اپراتور انسانی ارجاع دهند.
🔸هزینه استفاده از این مدل ۰.۱۰ دلار به ازای هر یک میلیو…
🧪 پروژه Andarium معرفی شد؛ شبیهساز اندروید برای iOS
🔹 اپلیکیشن Andarium یک شبیهساز است که از طریق جادوی سیستم User-mode Linux امکان اجرای برنامههای اندروید روی سیستمعامل iOS را فراهم میکند. این شبیهساز فعلاً بهصورت بتای TestFlight در دسترس قرار گرفته و کد منبع آن روی گیتهاب موجود است.
🔹 این پروژه که همچنان در دست توسعه و تکمیل قرار دارد، با کمک کرنل لینوکس و با پشتیبانی از Vulkan میتواند بسیاری از بازیهای…
🔹ردیاب هوشمند پیکسل تگ گوگل سرانجام برای رقابت با ایرتگ اپل عرضه شد
🔸 گوگل فروش رسمی ردیاب هوشمند پیکسل تگ را با قیمت ۲۹ دلار برای بسته تکی و ۹۹ دلار برای بسته چهارتایی آغاز کرد. این ردیاب اختصاصی اندروید برای مکانیابی اشیا از فناوری باند فوق وسیع (UWB)، سنجش کانال در بلوتوث ۶.۰ و شبکه جهانی Find Hub بهره میبرد.
🔸 ردیاب گوگل با اینکه همقیمت ایرتگ اپل است اما به یک دکمه فیزیکی مجهز شده که زنگ گوشی کاربر را به صدا…
🧞 ارسال بوی گل رز از طریق ایمیل؛ اینترنت به دنیای بوها رسید!
▪️دانشمندان سوئدی موفق شدند فناوری جدیدی توسعه بدن که امکان انتقال رایحه از طریق اینترنت رو فراهم میکنه ؛ درست مثل ارسال عکس و ویدئو، اما این بار برای بوها!
▪️در این فناوری، ترکیبات شیمیایی یک رایحه شناسایی و به دادههای دیجیتالی تبدیل میشه. سپس دستگاه مخصوصی در سمت گیرنده، با استفاده از این اطلاعات، همون بو رو بازسازی میکنه.
+ تا الان محققان موفق به انت…
🧩 با جمینای نقاشیها و طرحهای دستی خود را به اپلیکیشن تبدیل کنید
▫️ گوگل قابلیت جدیدی به جمینای اضافه کرده است که به کاربران اجازه میدهد عکس طرحهای کشیده شده روی کاغذ، مانند طرح رابط کاربری را ارسال کنند. این هوش مصنوعی سپس با کمک ابزار Canvas طرح بصری را بررسی و کد اجرایی برنامه آن را برای شما آماده میکند.
▫️ پس از آن میتوانید کد تولیدشده را درون محیط جمینای به صورت یک اپلیکیشن یا ابزار تعاملی اجرا و عملکرد آ…
👁️🗨️ گامی برای افزایش تعامل؛ کاربران ایکس حالا میتوانند از ویدیوها کلیپ بسازند
🔹 شبکه اجتماعی ایکس قابلیت جدیدی برای بریدن بخشهایی از ویدیوها و انتشار آنها بهصورت کلیپ ارائه کرد. با این ابزار کاربران میتوانند لحظات دلخواه خود را از ویدیوهای موجود انتخاب، توضیح یا دیدگاه خود را به آنها اضافه و بدون خروج از ایکس آنها را منتشر کنند.
🔹 ایکس میگوید هم سازنده ویدیوی اصلی و هم کاربری که از آن کلیپ میسازد، در صور…
⚡دیش استارلینک مینی ۲ با باتری قابلتعویض معرفی شد
🔸 مهمترین تغییر استارلینک مینی ۲ نسبت به نسل قبلی، باتری قابلتعویض است. استارلینک مینی قبلی برای تأمین انرژی به منبع برق خارجی یا پاوربانک نیاز داشت، اما در مدل جدید باتری از طریق سازوکار اتصال سریع به پشت دیش متصل میشود و دیگر نیازی به حمل پاوربانک جداگانه نیست.
🔸 استارلینک مینی ۲ از وایفای ۶ پشتیبانی میکند و محدوده پوشش بیسیم آن به حداکثر ۱۶۷ مترمربع میرسد…
📼 نخستین تصویر از ماکتهای سری گلکسی S27 فاش شد
▪️ تصاویر جدیدی از ماکتهای آلومینیومی خانواده گلکسی S27 منتشر شده که ظاهر و اندازه احتمالی مدلهای اولترا، پرو و پلاس را نشان میدهد. در این طرحها، دو مدل ردهبالا از ماژول دوربین عریض و مشابه زبان طراحی آیفون استفاده میکنند که کاملاً با ظاهر نسلهای قبلی پرچمداران سامسونگ متفاوت است.
▪️ همچنین طبق این تصاویر، نسخه پرو ابعاد بسیار کوچکتری نسبت به نسخههای اولترا و…
🧩 گوگل مدل هوش مصنوعی جمینای ۴ کربن را در دسترس عموم قرار داد
▫️ گوگل انتشار عمومی جدیدترین مدل هوش مصنوعی خود با نام جمینای ۴ کربن را آغاز کرد. این مدل پیشرفته پس از گذراندن آزمایش اولیه نزد کارشناسان امنیت سایبری، اکنون با تمرکز ویژه بر اجرای کارهای سنگین و تخصصی مثل برنامهنویسیهای چندمرحلهای و پژوهشهای علمی در دسترس قرار گرفته است.
▫️ همراه با این مدل، ابزار جدیدی با نام Swarm برای راهاندازی همزمان و تیمی …
🧩 آنتروپیک از ابزارهای اداری وایتبرد، شیتس و میتینگ برای Claude رونمایی کرد
▪️ آنتروپیک مجموعهای از ابزارهای جدید را به کلاد اضافه کرد که به کاربران امکان میدهد فایل صفحهگسترده بسازند، جلسات کاری را مدیریت کنند، ایدههای خود را روی وایتبرد مشترک سازماندهی نمایند و دادههای شرکت را تحلیل کنند. این ابزارها رقیبی برای مجموعه ابزارهای اداری گوگل و مایکروسافت محسوب میشوند.
▪️ نام ابزارهای جدید آنتروپیک Claude She…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 337 posts we hold for @zhicroid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zhicroid edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞 𝐯𝐩𝐧 | ܣܩܘ ܥ݆ܨ ܝߊیܭَߊܔ @Express_freevpn · 27,239 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 7 here — alongside 6 others — read 11 September 2026
ترفندکده @tarfandkade_youtube · 38,714 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 30 August 2026
NEW MTProxi @NEW_MTProxi · 43,313 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 4 September 2026
13HACK @TMsizdah · 19,967 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 3 October 2026
ShadowProxy66 @ShadowProxy66 · 87,160 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 17 August 2026
𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗟𝗮𝗻𝗱 🕊️ @Freeland8 · 28,823 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 9 September 2026
𝐯𝐩𝐧_𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐱𝐲𝟒𝟎𝟏 @vpn_proxy400 · 22,598 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 20 September 2026
Smart Skill @SmartSkill · 24,559 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 September 2026
OXNET CHANNEL @oxnet_ir · 44,324 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 30 August 2026
skill_look @skill_look1 · 19,222 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 30 September 2026
🔰 Peweza Tech @PewezaTech · 141,793 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zhicroid” (@zhicroid), 13,428 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhicroid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.