Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алёна | про лабораторию

Channel

Алёна | про лабораторию

@zhdanova_vet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002682320754
TypeChannel
Username@zhdanova_vet
Descriptionветеринарный врач рассказываю про КЛД и ИФА простым языком :: интересные кейсы, разборы, ветеринарная лаборатория написать в личные сообщения: @zhdanova_aln
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/zhdanova_vet

Growth

11210 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 112 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 112 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 07:1610 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 111–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 07:30112no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:16112first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Videos
5
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8135.1%
🔥6929.9%
😍3515.2%
👍229.52%
🤩83.46%
custom 538911037356980014762.60%
👏52.16%
💯52.16%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhdanova_vet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2025 to 7 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2026, 08:26 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DZPC6IJMMeG/?igsh=Nmlmd3l0dTdhM2g= Неожиданно вернулась в Инсту 😄 Буду рада видеть вас там💛

😍42🔥2

10 Apr 2026, 07:57 UTC257 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вчера был хороший день с чудесными людьми 🩵💜

11😍7🔥5👏1

24 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTC373 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Применяете ли вы скатерограммы в своей практике? *️⃣опрос для врачей лаборатории

  1. да59%
  2. нет41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTC332 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что скрывают загадочные графики вашего анализатора? Вы видели эти красивые разноцветные облака на экране своего геманализатора? Сегодня поговорим именно о них! Скатерограммы — это диаграмма рассеяния, которую выстраивает и выводит на экран гематологический анализатор после обработки данных. ➡️Скатерограммы, полученные на наших анализаторах, не только красиво выглядят, но и могут быть информативными! Они представ

🔥109👍4

10 Dec 2025, 13:23 UTC319 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вы когда-нибудь видели танцы и песни на лекциях❓ Я - да! ❤️ Вчера мне удалось побывать в городе Тверь на ветеринарном лектории от VetApex и должна сказать, что это очень крутой формат конференции. 🧷Ребята создали атмосферу камерного мероприятия, это что-то новое и классное! 🧷Мы подробно разбирали клинические случаи с разными специалистами, что значительно прокачивает клиническое мышление. Это действительно новы

10🔥7😍6👍1

8 Dec 2025, 14:13 UTC239 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Знания преаналитики — насколько они важны? На самом деле каждый этап важен⚡️ Маркировка пробирок! Казалось бы, простая процедура, однако даже тут могут быть проблемы... Самые частые ошибки: 📌забыли подписать пробирки 📌указали только фамилию/кличку 📌подписали гелевой ручкой/обычным фломастером😢 📌замотали всю пробирку лейкопластырем 📌подписали нечитаемо Помните, что от точности преаналитического этапа зависит т

10🔥6🤩4👍2💯1

24 Nov 2025, 11:01 UTC265 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🌟Про амилазу https://eclinpath.com/chemistry/pancreas/amylase/ 🌟Исследование диагностической полезности Spec fPLin оценка 274 больных кошек https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7379029/ 🌟Результаты cPLI у собак с портальной гипертензией https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8120087/ 🌟Влияние преднизолона на концентрацию cPLI у здоровых собак https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6168014/ 🌟Про этиологию,

🔥7👍6custom 538911037356980014763👏1

24 Nov 2025, 11:00 UTC209 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Часто врачи сталкиваются с рекомендациями сдать амилазу для диагностики панкреатита. Сегодня разберём, почему это неверно. Амилаза — фермент, который вырабатывается ПЖ и участвует в расщеплении углеводов. У здоровых собак 14% амилазы связано с глобулинами. Из-за этой полимеризации собачья амилаза имеет переменный молекулярный вес и обычно не фильтруется почками. У собак с заболеваниями почек макроамилаза обнаружива

9🔥7💯4👍1

14 Nov 2025, 15:01 UTC266 views22 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Одной из моих любимых находок стали очаровательные гемоплазмы 🖤 Чем же они заслужили особое внимание, спросите вы❓ ➡️дело в том, что обнаружить этих микроорганизмов при микроскопии удается крайне редко кто такие гемоплазмы? ◽️гемоплазмы — это бактерии, которые прикрепляются к поверхности эритроцитов. ◽️у кошек выделяют 3 основных вида гемоплазм: ➡️Mycoplasma haemofelis: наиболее патогенен среди всех известных в

10🔥5😍4👍2🤩1

13 Nov 2025, 13:05 UTC220 views24 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ветеринарные каналы и сообщества буквально заполнены фото с NVC. Мне посчастливилось оказаться среди участников и окунуться в эту атмосферу. Особенно радостно было вновь встретить знакомых коллег, обменяться впечатлениями и пообщаться♥️🫂 Спасибо всем кто подходил❤️‍🩹 #nvc_2025

10🔥6😍4👍3👏1

3 Oct 2025, 11:12 UTC310 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

🤍делюсь полезным атласом по идентификации яиц гельминтов у различных видов животных — пригодится каждому специалисту!🫂 📎сохраняйте

😍10🔥8🤩3

3 Oct 2025, 11:02 UTC259 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

[паразитологическая находка] ◽️яйца Oxyurida у ящерицы 🦎 ◽️метод исследования - флотация

7🔥6👍3👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @zhdanova_vet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Jan 2026, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Применяете ли вы скатерограммы в своей практике? *️⃣опрос для врачей лаборатории

  1. да59%
  2. нет41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 7 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,136,852 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алёна | про лабораторию” (@zhdanova_vet), 112 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhdanova_vet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.