Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жариков Кирилл

Channel

Жариков Кирилл

@zharikovkirill

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

117,027subscribers

+114,114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003918040647
TypeChannel
Username@zharikovkirill
DescriptionПодписывайся в других сетях👇👇👇 Мой YT: https://www.youtube.com/@zharikovkirill Мой TT: https://www.tiktok.com/@kerefa_hbo Мой Inst: https://www.instagram.com/kerefa_hbo Сотрудничество: t.me/ekaterrkoz
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zharikovkirill

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,913163,76683,339.56 August 2026 — 2,913 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,913 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,935 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124,664 subscribers10 August 2026 — 129,572 subscribers11 August 2026 — 136,487 subscribers12 August 2026 — 139,850 subscribers13 August 2026 — 143,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 146,920 subscribers16 August 2026 — 155,467 subscribers17 August 2026 — 158,169 subscribers18 August 2026 — 159,949 subscribers19 August 2026 — 161,861 subscribers20 August 2026 — 163,766 subscribers21 August 2026 — 146,849 subscribers23 August 2026 — 139,980 subscribers24 August 2026 — 136,095 subscribers25 August 2026 — 134,315 subscribers26 August 2026 — 133,211 subscribers27 August 2026 — 131,866 subscribers28 August 2026 — 130,438 subscribers29 August 2026 — 129,687 subscribers30 August 2026 — 128,530 subscribers31 August 2026 — 127,377 subscribers1 September 2026 — 126,170 subscribers3 September 2026 — 125,599 subscribers4 September 2026 — 124,801 subscribers7 September 2026 — 123,215 subscribers10 September 2026 — 121,597 subscribers12 September 2026 — 120,329 subscribers14 September 2026 — 119,304 subscribers15 September 2026 — 118,149 subscribers18 September 2026 — 117,027 subscribers117,0276 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +114,114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:57117,027-1,122
15 Sept 2026, 21:18118,149-1,155
14 Sept 2026, 05:19119,304-1,025
12 Sept 2026, 11:22120,329-1,268
10 Sept 2026, 09:37121,597-1,618
7 Sept 2026, 04:15123,215-1,586
4 Sept 2026, 14:20124,801-798
3 Sept 2026, 00:34125,599-571
1 Sept 2026, 22:26126,170-1,207
31 Aug 2026, 21:34127,377-1,153
30 Aug 2026, 22:34128,530-1,157
29 Aug 2026, 21:34129,687-751
28 Aug 2026, 22:34130,438-1,428
27 Aug 2026, 19:52131,866-1,345
26 Aug 2026, 18:04133,211-1,104
25 Aug 2026, 21:13134,315-1,780
24 Aug 2026, 21:29136,095-3,885
23 Aug 2026, 04:02139,980-6,869
21 Aug 2026, 13:12146,849-16,917
20 Aug 2026, 13:22163,766first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 117,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
26,500
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held64 (1 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total635,300
Reactions total25,316
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
54
Videos
6
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 29s
Average length
1m 05s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

80,245 reactions across 61 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥54,92268.4%
🔥17,38121.7%
👍2,5253.15%
1,9012.37%
👻1,6382.04%
🐳6730.839%
😍5170.644%
🤗3580.446%
💊1570.196%
🤬1020.127%
💯550.069%
🏆130.016%
👎30.004%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,700 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
283
across the posts below
Posts paid on
48
of 63 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
70
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zharikovkirill. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 64 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC≈11,200 views976 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Ну что… ПОЛМИЛЛИОНА НА РОЛИКЕ‼️ 500 000 просмотров. Для кого-то просто цифра, а я сижу и смотрю на неё с мыслью: ЩАС ЧО?! Кажется, это моя первая большая победа здесь. Погнали дальше 😈

❤‍🔥80975👍61🔥18🐳7🤗3😍2👻1

19 Sept 2026, 10:11 UTC≈20,700 views943 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥773👍8348🔥19🐳8👻3💊3🤬3

17 Sept 2026, 06:35 UTC≈23,800 views1,253 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Video

Карты - под стол. Проекты - на стол. 😁 В конце вчерашнего ролика вы могли заметить небольшой трейлер. Да. Это мой новый ПЕРВЫЙ большой проект. (Сам в шоке) Сейчас он в работе. Но совсем скоро будет и на моем канале 🙄 Пока могу сказать только две вещи: • СОСТАВ КДМ. • Ребята были очень УДИВЛЕНЫ 😈 И поверьте, это только начало. Ждем? ❤️

❤‍🔥1,050🔥11754👍10😍8🐳7👻7

16 Sept 2026, 16:55 UTC≈20,600 views873 reactions4 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥620❤‍🔥165👍59👻11🐳9💊54

16 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈19,900 views906 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

НОВЫЙ РОЛИК НА КАНАЛЕ ‼️ Обязательно залетай смотреть и проведи время с удовольствием ❤️ Очень жду ваш фидбек в комментариях - я всегда всё внимательно читаю и изучаю! На этот ролик я потратил заметно больше времени, чем обычно, поэтому очень надеюсь, что вы реально кайфанёте. Думаю, оно того стоило. Ну а теперь… ГААААААААААААААЗ! 🔥

❤‍🔥763🔥83👍42😍7👻6🐳5

16 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC≈16,400 views695 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026

ГРУЖУ НА КАНАЛ ‼️

🔥570❤‍🔥89🐳25👍63🤗2

16 Sept 2026, 09:30 UTC≈18,000 views856 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Надеюсь, вы уже посмотрели новые ролики у ребят и кайфанули! 🔥 А вот вам немного бекстейджа и уроков правильной работы с костром 😁 Сегодня вечером - моя очередь. В районе 17:00–18:00 по МСК выгружаю новый ролик. И в этот раз это абсолютно новый подход к монтажу 😬 И главное - досмотрите до конца. Там вас будет ждать небольшой сюрприз 🕵🏽‍♂️ Как вам образ?🤣🤣🤣

🔥683❤‍🔥120👍42🐳4🤗3😍21👻1

15 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC≈21,000 views1,102 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

СМОТРЕТЬ ВЫ НЕ ПОВЕРИТЕ! 🤣 У меня, оказывается, ещё остались истории ХУЖЕ, чем та самая про лысых детей… Получилась невероятная посиделка с друзьями у костра 🔥 Истории - одна страшнее другой. Залетайте смотреть! А на обложке меня нет. Я спрятался 🫥

❤‍🔥934🔥95👍58👻12🐳3

15 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC≈17,500 views740 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥570❤‍🔥105👍39😍13🐳83👻2

14 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC≈19,700 views836 reactions4 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥673🔥81😍47🐳19👍10👻6

14 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈22,300 views746 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥612🔥57🤬33👍19🐳9👻7🤗54

14 Sept 2026, 20:32 UTC≈24,300 views721 reactions6 Starsread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥602🔥50🐳49👻13👍3🤗2🤬1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @zharikovkirill. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll11,600 voters approx.

И вот интересно - смогли бы вы после этого спокойно там жить?🙄

  1. Да, прошлое квартиры меня не волнует54%
  2. Нет, мне было бы некомфортно46%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жариков Кирилл” (@zharikovkirill), 117,027 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zharikovkirill.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.