Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Че там у Дэнчика⁉️

Channel

Че там у Дэнчика⁉️

@U_Operatora

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

148,623subscribers

+108,349 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001561277635
TypeChannel
Username@U_Operatora
DescriptionЯ Рад Всем ❤️❤️❤️ Правила группы: https://t.me/U_Operatora/3041 Почта и ТГ для сотрудничества: [email protected] / @krista_kelly
Created4 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/U_Operatora

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,274190,446115,3606 August 2026 — 40,274 subscribers6 August 2026 — 40,274 subscribers7 August 2026 — 104,952 subscribers8 August 2026 — 134,536 subscribers9 August 2026 — 147,352 subscribers10 August 2026 — 155,254 subscribers11 August 2026 — 162,966 subscribers12 August 2026 — 167,193 subscribers13 August 2026 — 170,585 subscribers14 August 2026 — 174,140 subscribers16 August 2026 — 181,949 subscribers17 August 2026 — 184,840 subscribers18 August 2026 — 186,745 subscribers19 August 2026 — 188,642 subscribers20 August 2026 — 190,446 subscribers21 August 2026 — 174,411 subscribers23 August 2026 — 169,336 subscribers24 August 2026 — 165,485 subscribers25 August 2026 — 164,302 subscribers26 August 2026 — 163,074 subscribers27 August 2026 — 162,054 subscribers28 August 2026 — 160,876 subscribers29 August 2026 — 159,970 subscribers30 August 2026 — 159,132 subscribers31 August 2026 — 158,185 subscribers1 September 2026 — 156,855 subscribers2 September 2026 — 156,276 subscribers4 September 2026 — 155,577 subscribers6 September 2026 — 153,997 subscribers10 September 2026 — 152,463 subscribers12 September 2026 — 151,254 subscribers14 September 2026 — 150,368 subscribers16 September 2026 — 149,475 subscribers18 September 2026 — 148,623 subscribers148,6236 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +108,349. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,748–212,972 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:19148,623-852
16 Sept 2026, 01:37149,475-893
14 Sept 2026, 06:01150,368-886
12 Sept 2026, 11:17151,254-1,209
10 Sept 2026, 04:55152,463-1,534
6 Sept 2026, 19:20153,997-1,580
4 Sept 2026, 09:37155,577-699
2 Sept 2026, 23:16156,276-579
1 Sept 2026, 19:44156,855-1,330
31 Aug 2026, 19:29158,185-947
30 Aug 2026, 20:58159,132-838
29 Aug 2026, 20:07159,970-906
28 Aug 2026, 18:57160,876-1,178
27 Aug 2026, 18:47162,054-1,020
26 Aug 2026, 20:14163,074-1,228
25 Aug 2026, 18:32164,302-1,183
24 Aug 2026, 21:14165,485-3,851
23 Aug 2026, 04:19169,336-5,075
21 Aug 2026, 16:08174,411-16,035
20 Aug 2026, 13:25190,446first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 107 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.5%
avg views ÷ 148,623 subscribers
Avg views / post
33,400
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held71 (27 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,168,300
Reactions total73,907
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,610
Videos
≈657
Links
≈304

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 03s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

174,339 reactions across 71 posts, in 48 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤129,84774.5%
🔥10,0465.76%
❤‍🔥10,0395.76%
👀8,9505.13%
💘3,2791.88%
👍2,2111.27%
🥰1,8591.07%
💋1,4060.806%
🤔1,3500.774%
👻9100.522%
😢8750.502%
🍓8180.469%
🤣6030.346%
🦄4470.256%
😘2010.115%
👏1950.112%
🤨1760.101%
🤯1070.061%
🕊1010.058%
💊800.046%
28 further kinds8390.481%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174,339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
469
across the posts below
Posts paid on
58
of 71 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
67
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @U_Operatora. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.41%
1 of 71 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
29,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
35,600
over 70 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdxURaB11 September 20261 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC≈10,100 views1,508 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Как думаете, вкусно будет или не?

❤1,190🥰154🔥109❤‍🔥25🍓15💘15

25 Sept 2026, 02:10 UTC≈22,200 views2,780 reactions5 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

За несколько минут до столкновения 🩼☠️ https://youtu.be/ELD3yFxelqs?is=nrPox0bdLZB72dTg Успели уже посмотреть ролик??

🔥2,020❤519🥰152💔41❤‍🔥38😈10

23 Sept 2026, 16:44 UTC≈26,200 views1,439 reactions15 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Ребят, я отдохнул, набрался сил и даже успел немного поснимать - и маленькие видосы, и материальчик для одного большого выпуска. Посмотрим, что из этого получится 👀 Так что меня не теряем - впереди много всего интересного. Возвращаемся чуть по чуть в рабочий режим) А пока держите немного ночного Бали 🌴🌙 Всех обнял приподнял, дальше больше интересно, думаю вы будете приятно удивлены))

❤1,180❤‍🔥143🔥84💘17🥰8🕊7

22 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈27,500 views1,316 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026
Photo

Знаете, что самое страшное в «Одиссее»? Не море и не боги, а пещера, из которой нельзя выйти, а ещё одноглазый людоед, который ест твоих воинов одного за другим 👁 Этой страшилке больше 2500 лет. Гомер придумал её задолго до фильмов ужасов. Кристофер Нолан, например, для «Одиссеи» построил циклопа в натуральную величину — аниматронную куклу высотой с трёхэтажный дом, без единого кадра CGI. Но такой монстр — бюджет ур…

❤1,200❤‍🔥57🌚32🔥12💩8👏7

21 Sept 2026, 15:49 UTC≈28,800 views1,558 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026
Photo

Кто-нибудь уже смотрел «Одиссею»? Только давайте без спойлеров ❌❌❌ У меня пока нормально не получается её загрузить, но уже многое успел прочитать про фильм. В плане режиссуры, масштаба и вообще того, как всё это снимали, конечно, должен быть шедевр. Кто уже посмотрел - стоит?

❤1,320👍115💘83👎20😁12💊8

20 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈32,500 views2,833 reactions6 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Конечно, на Бали прекрасно. Но вот ради чего 100000% стоит вернуться, Булочка скучает ❤️

❤2,360🥰246💘154❤‍🔥43🔥18🍓12

19 Sept 2026, 01:50 UTC≈32,300 views1,656 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤1,290🔥194💘112❤‍🔥40🤩13🍓7

18 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC≈34,500 views1,635 reactions5 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Ребят, большая часть из вас знает меня как Мистера Икс - мистика, страшные истории и всё такое. Но другая часть знает, что есть у меня ещё одна большая любовь - это тачки. И недавно мы с ребятами на наших старых BMW отправились в Минск. Получилось большое и очень крутое приключение на несколько серий, совсем не похожее на то, что вы обычно видите у меня. Это крутая история, связанная с машинами, друзьями и путешест…

❤1,360❤‍🔥147🔥94👍17🍓9🎄8

17 Sept 2026, 11:04 UTC≈35,700 views1,280 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Я просто хотел заказать себе что-нибудь сладкое к чаю…. В итоге каким-то образом дошёл до того, что выбирал между тортом в виде тачки, лягушек и динозавра, но решил остановиться на классике😂 Короче, впервые заказал торт через Флаувау. Там можно найти не только обычные торты, а вообще все что только душеньке угодно: с надписями, своим дизайном, разными начинками. Я залип выбирать дольше, чем собирался 😅 В итоге зак…

❤1,070❤‍🔥111🥰71🔥17👻7🎄4

16 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC≈35,200 views1,671 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026
Photo

WTF??!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jWdTX9Q0II

❤1,360❤‍🔥127👀110😨46👍17🙈11

16 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC≈35,400 views3,309 reactions8 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Спасибо за такую поддержку ❤️ я это очень ценю. Следующая цель - 300к Поможете набить?

❤2,850😘201🔥184❤‍🔥38👻22💋14

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @U_Operatora. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Че там у Дэнчика⁉️” (@U_Operatora), 148,623 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/U_Operatora.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.