Channel
@zhang_heterophobic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
375subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001618338413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zhang_heterophobic |
| Created | 26 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zhang_heterophobic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 375 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 377 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:51 | 377 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 9 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
804 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 285 | 35.4% | |
| 🍓 | 160 | 19.9% | |
| 💋 | 116 | 14.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 104 | 12.9% | |
| 💔 | 92 | 11.4% | |
| 😭 | 22 | 2.74% | |
| ☃ | 13 | 1.62% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.871% | |
| 🎄 | 3 | 0.373% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.249% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 804reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2024 to 8 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
вы знаете какое хуевое отношение у вейкван к своим артистам, но проблема глубже, чем вы думаете и здесь представлен весь материал, собранный за все годы существования в1. прошу максимальный репост вне зависимости в каких мы с вами отношениях. жаловаться на мистритмент - одно дело, а делать что-то чтобы бороться с этим - другое !
💘10💋1
Signed bb juniormarkova
утро в нашем доме начинается одинаково 😒 фанбазы кеплер и изна подготовили огромный документ, включающий в себя подробности всего мистритмента, которому подвержены все артисты вэйквана, а также участники шоу от мнет. кеплиан и ная также подготовили для нас шаблоны постов, с помощью которых необходимо попытаться осветить эту тему в твиттере, поэтому я прошу фандомы всего вэйквана подключиться и помочь, потому что никт…
❤🔥6💘5
Signed bb juniormarkova
я так поняла люди не отстанут от меня и будут приплетать моих подруг даже после закрытия ччангури. соо про блонд было написано миллион лет назад, я даже сама удивилась, когда увидела свои динозаврские обои с ниннин 👍 да, все что я говорила правда. но у людей мозгов не хватает, чтобы реально думать, что я закрою канал из-за какой-то покраски волос. в конце концов, я не оскорбляла самого хао, а увидела всякие эдиты с б…
❤🔥27😭18💘15💋7🍓3
Signed биби
ровно год назад йехваз гуляли вместе на день рождения олли вонки и мы получили эти легендарные фоточки🤍 my precious family :c
💘52💋13❤🔥9🍓9⚡6😭2
Signed биби
окончательно closed 🔐 мне жаль, что так поступаю, но теперь точно конец ччангури 🫶 я рада, что я когда-то решилась на создание ччангури и вела его с душой. но открыв его снова, я поняла, что сейчас меня возможно уже мало интересует ведение тгк или возможно я перегорела к джеби. пожалуйста, не осуждайте меня 🥹 большое спасибо всем за эти 11 месяцев с ччангури !! вы - мое самое лучшее воспоминание из 2023 года 💋💋
💔92💘20❤🔥16🍓6💋6🍾2😭2☃1
Signed биби
ХАОХАО ПОЛУЧИЛ СВОЮ ПЕРВУЮ СОЛО НАГРАДУ
💘43🍓13❤🔥8☃6💋5
Signed биби
джеби взяли еще одну награду новичка, тем самым получив награды на пяти главных церемониях ROOKIE GRAND SLAM IS COMPLETED‼️
❤🔥34🍓15💘14☃4💋4🎄2
Signed биби
Sticker, posted without a caption
💘4🍓1
Signed биби
по словам кор джероуз пусан стал городком чжан хао👀 вокруг арены ccma флажки, баннеры, дирижабль, два грузовика с фотографиями хаохао и на улице громко играет always 😘 я стэню чайна бар то как они готовят каждый раз чудесные проекты😪
🍓44💘12💋10❤🔥2
Signed биби
🌷៸៸ ♡̸◞𝘮𝘪𝘯𝘪 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥 part 2 : чжан хао как красная панда‘⊹ ↩️
💘32🍓10💋1
Signed биби
хао 🤝 гонук идеальный баланс ума и физической силы !
💋46💘11🍓8☃2
Signed биби
happy birthday our wookie 👀 в честь 19-летия нашего giant baby предлагаю вспомнить с чего началась дружба гонхао 💋
💘49🍓16💋12
Signed биби
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zhang_heterophobic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 374,243 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zhang_heterophobic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“jjanguri archive” (@zhang_heterophobic), 375 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhang_heterophobic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.