Channel
@zeus_ai_technology
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
782subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001605238816 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zeus_ai_technology |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zeus_ai_technology |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 782 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 783 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (1 August 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,751 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
◽️ دلیل حذف موقت تلگرام از فروشگاه نرمافزاری اپل اعلام شد. شرکت اپل اعلام کرد پیامرسان تلگرام را بهطور موقت از فروشگاه نرمافزاری خود حذف کرده بود، زیرا محتوایی ناقض سیاستهای این شرکت در زمینه سوءاستفاده جنسی از کودکان (CSAM) شناسایی شده بود. به گفته اپل، پس از آنکه تیم تلگرام محتوای موردنظر را حذف و حساب کاربری منتشرکننده آن را مسدود کرد، این پیامرسان دوباره به فروشگاه نرمافزاری اپل بازگردانده شد. اپل تأکید…
Signed Sarvin
https://t.me/zeus110/1857
Signed Sarvin
◽️ طراحی اتاق فکر با الهام از تکامل #هوش_مصنوعی #اتاق_فکر #فرگشت #رباتیک #علم #تکنولوژی ♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒍 ➣ 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎
Signed Sarvin
افزایش کلیک ویدیو با دستیار هوش مصنوعی Ask Studio #هوش_مصنوعی #رباتیک #علم #تکنولوژی ♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒍 ➣ 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎
Signed Sarvin
◽️ ایلان ماسک قصد دارد با تراشه نورالینک نابینایی را درمان کند. فناوری بلایندسایت قرار است با کاشت یک تراشه در قشر بینایی مغز، مسیر طبیعی چشم و عصب بینایی را دور بزند و مستقیماً سیگنالهای بینایی را به مغز ارسال کند. هدف اولیه این پروژه، بازگرداندن نوعی بینایی به برخی افراد نابیناست؛ هرچند در آغاز، این بینایی احتمالاً محدود به تشخیص نور، اشکال و موانع خواهد بود و نه دید کاملاً طبیعی. ◽️ اما جاهطلبانهترین بخش این پ…
❤2👍1
Signed Sarvin
سال ۱۹۹۶ است و شما بازی DUKE3D را روی MS-DOS اجرا میکنید. . . . #نوستالژی ♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒍 ➣ 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
هوش مصنوعی چگونه یک نیروگاه زمینگرمایی ورشکسته را در نیومکزیکو نجات داد؟ نیروگاه زمینگرمایی لایتنینگ داک در نیومکزیکو که به دلیل کاهش شدید دما با بحران مواجه شده بود، با کمک فناوریهای پیشرفته دوباره احیا شد. زانسکار پس از خرید این مجموعه، متوجه شد دمای آب ورودی به ۱۲۱ درجهی سانتیگراد رسیده که بسیار کمتر از حد نیاز ۱۵۴ درجهی سانتیگراد برای تولید مؤثر برق است. استفاده از مدلسازی مبتنی بر هوش مصنوعی و یادگیری ما…
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
🟦پرامپت مورد نیاز : Create a premium editorial portrait featuring the uploaded person standing beside a playful ink-twin doodle version of themselves. FORMAT LOCK Vertical 4:5 composition. Full-body view. Both figures fully visible. Side-by-side layout. Clean minimalist composition. IDENTITY LOCK Use the uploaded image as the only identity reference. Preserve the exact face, facial features, eye shape, nose, lips, s…
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
🔺سفر رایگان 1️⃣فیلترشکن رو روشن کنید (کشور آمریکا یا کانادا باشه) 2️⃣وارد سایت gemini.google.com بشید 3️⃣از بخش tools گزینه create images رو فعال کنید 4️⃣متن پرامپت رو اونجا paste کنید، عکستون رو آپلود کنید و درخواست رو بفرستید Create a stunning edit of me in Turkey, And 4k HD Istanbul, standing on a rooftop. I am wearing a over- sized black linen shirt, grey 1oose cargo pants white sneakers, watch is left hand, da…
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
🔴دانشمندان IBM با انجام ۳ آزمایش مدعی دستیابی به برتری کوانتومی شدند 🔹 این آزمایشها که توسط IBM و چند مؤسسه تحقیقاتی انجام شده، نشان میدهند کامپیوترهای کوانتومی میتوانند محاسبات بسیار پیچیده، مانند محاسیه واکنشهای شیمیایی را در چند دقیقه انجام دهند؛ درحالیکه همین محاسبات برای قویترین ابررایانهها سالها طول میکشد. 🔹 در این پژوهشها از کامپیوتر کوانتومی ابررسانای Heron R3 شرکت آیبیام و الگوریتمهای پیشرفته …
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
🚨: هیتاچی EH4000 یک کامیون کمپرسی معدنی عظیمالجثه است که لاستیکهای غولپیکرش هر کدام حدود ۶۰٬۰۰۰ دلار قیمت دارند.😱 ابعادش باورنکردنیه #هوش_مصنوعی ♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ 𝒄𝒉𝒂𝒏𝒏𝒆𝒍 ➣ 𝑻𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎
Signed 𝑯𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @zeus_ai_technology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 403,580 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zeus_ai_technology named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش مصنوعی و تکنولوژی” (@zeus_ai_technology), 782 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zeus_ai_technology.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.