Gmgm Taxation is theft (unless it's my shitcoin)
π7β€5

Channel
@zerosalpha
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
218subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946055600 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zerosalpha |
| Description | Channel for all the snipes, rugs, alpha and my launches. NO PAID SHIT Owner: @Zero_the_One |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zerosalpha |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 218 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 218 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2023 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
43 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 18 | 41.9% | |
| β€ | 11 | 25.6% | |
| π | 9 | 20.9% | |
| π | 3 | 6.98% | |
| π’ | 1 | 2.33% | |
| π± | 1 | 2.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2023 to 26 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gmgm Taxation is theft (unless it's my shitcoin)
π7β€5
I am still supporting the $GN coin, both community and dev working on it. I believe some Xs may still be made, calling for culture. GN sers https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc14B5C20df98A8e63820dd83c1E3a49c7fFa1B8A https://gudnite.wtf/ https://twitter.com/GudNiteERC https://t.me/GudNiteERC
π₯8π’1
Video, posted without a caption
Current ETH Price: $2034.03 ποΈ Rapid: 400.00 Gwei Transfer: $17.09 Swap: $105.63 π Standard: 329.73 Gwei Transfer: $14.08 Swap: $87.08
π1
Gm Technically reached like 400k but let's be real. Onto the next one
β€2π1
Aping this weird thing, no info: https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc4bb7f38ec32582ce55835c0c2e22e84592a0e73 180k
Gud Night Buy! π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€ π΅ 0.70 ETH ($1407.51) πͺ 5,575,603,967 GN π· 0xddf9β¦07b5 | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $264,285 π₯ Chart π΅ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
GM (GN), 8x completed RUNNER
Gud Night Buy! π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€ π΅ 0.10 ETH ($202.77) πͺ 1,410,780,334 GN π· 0x6e27β¦657a | Txn β New Holder πΌ Market Cap $143,216 π₯ Chart π΅ Trade πΉ Trending π’ Trending π₯ @ETHTRENDING
π₯2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Hit 110k, bottomed and nicely reversed to 80k. Community working hard
Aping this one, similar to GM play https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xc14B5C20df98A8e63820dd83c1E3a49c7fFa1B8A https://gudnite.wtf/ https://twitter.com/GudNiteERC https://t.me/GudNiteERC 32k, 0.2% tax lol
π₯7β€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zerosalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,092,524 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@zerosalpha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βZero's Alpha πβ (@zerosalpha), 218 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zerosalpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.