Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ноль_инсайда

Channel

Ноль_инсайда

@zero_insd

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,082subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001825926903
TypeChannel
Username@zero_insd
Created31 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/zero_insd

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0761,0831,079.56 August 2026 — 1,076 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,082 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,081 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,083 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,080 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,079 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,081 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,082 subscribers1,0826 August 202614 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 39 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,075–1,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 10:181,082+1
10 Sept 2026, 18:141,081+2
5 Sept 2026, 23:581,079-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:481,080-3
29 Aug 2026, 11:541,083+2
16 Aug 2026, 16:141,081-2
12 Aug 2026, 17:271,083+1
9 Aug 2026, 08:021,082+3
6 Aug 2026, 12:341,079no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:301,079+3
6 Aug 2026, 05:341,076first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7342.7%
🔥6739.2%
😁148.19%
❤‍🔥63.51%
👍52.92%
💔42.34%
🐳10.585%
💯10.585%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:59 UTC152 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вижу, много добрых людей пришло на публикацию с мастерклассом. Здравствуйте! (Старые-добрые люди, конечно и вам доброе утро!). Новых хочу предупредить - подобное этому мастерклассу здесь бывает не часто. Я в основном занята той рутиной, о которой на видео и говорю. Здесь же: редкие шутки, мысли, перепосты моих и чужих интересных постов. Если вам понравилось видео где я что то говорю - здесь ссылки на два старых масте…

❤7🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC390 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Долгожданный полезный контент на этом канале. Долетела запись моего выступления на форуме VIDMK в мае этого года. Мастеркласс назывался "Думай как шоураннер. Найти, упаковать, продать, repeat." Главный посыл этого выступления был в том, что шансы на реализацию вашего творческого проекта будут сильно выше, если вы будете воспринимать и вести себя не только как его автор, но и как его продюсер, с самого начала. Далее,…

🔥24❤‍🔥4👍2

5 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC309 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ты.: нам нужен обычный человек в шляпе через минуту костюм.: *картинка.: Страдающее средневековье

😁10

4 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC306 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @nabokovlife

Пишу нагишом в саду. 1941 год, 23 июля 42 года

❤7🔥3😁1

30 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC443 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Непокой» был просмотрен на предпремьерном показе. И, да, я согласна с критиками — это опыт который точно стоит пережить. Из многих причин назову одну — редкая терапевтическая возможность разделить с живыми людьми рядом с тобой тревогу и неопределенность разлитую в воздухе, не вдаваясь в дискуссии и не отвечая за свои чувства ни перед кем. Ну и просто это безумно стильно звучит и выглядит. В прокате с 30 июля. Про:вз…

❤11💔4💯1

27 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC403 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @firstbookshelfPhoto

Коллеги, презентация презентаций. Смотрите, комментируйте, делитесь, живите счастливо

🔥11❤‍🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 16:33 UTC302 viewsread 6 August 2026

Для тех, кто, как и я, не верит, что ИИ сделает презентацию для фильма лучше чем талантливый человек ⤵️

26 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC351 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dreamonspecPhoto

Принес почитать сценарий «Бухты вдов». Этим сериалом я уже восхищался. Вы знаете, наверняка, что Кэти Диппольд придумала эту историю еще 20 лет назад – ее первый драфт даже не был «Бухтой вдов» как таковой. Это был спек, с которым она получила работу в авторской комнате «Парков и зон отдыха». Тогда существовала такая практика: когда автор хотел устроиться на сериал, он писал сценарий серии, чтобы показать, что чувс…

❤7

24 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC339 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сколько времени нужно на монтаж? В индустрии где цикл производства измеряется годами - это жизненно важный вопрос, связанный с планированием бюджета и возвратом инвестиций. Лично мой опыт 50+ проектов, от черновой сборки до финальных мастеров, и опыт коллег, за которыми я наблюдаю уже 12 лет, позволил сделать некоторые выводы, а именно.: Чтобы смонтировать художественный фильм или сериал, понадобится столько же вре…

❤15🔥11

23 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC341 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @turgenev_life

Мы с Вами прокопченные сельди, которых ничего уже не берет. 1860 год, 26 июня 41 год

❤9🔥3😁3

22 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC273 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Шесть лет от первого питча до премьеры. Люди, хорошо подумайте, прежде чем идти в авторы кино!) И, обязательно, организуйте себе запасной источник дохода! ⤵️

🔥11

22 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC346 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @scriptdoctorchaosPhoto

Путь длинною в Фейк В 2020 году - это когда был ковид. Другие времена. Мы с Артёмом нашли статью, про то как девушку в США сталкерили 15 лет. Мы просто проглотили её - не девушку, статью. Что там и как расскажу ближе к концу сериала, потому что мы, конечно - вдохновились. После этого мы сразу стали изучать тему сталкинга. Оказалось, что в России юридически защититься от сталкинга ты никак не можешь. Физически скорее…

❤12👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @zero_insd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ШОУРАННЕР
@iamshowrunner · 50,610
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ноль_инсайда” (@zero_insd), 1,082 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zero_insd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.