Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐙 𝐄 𝐑 𝐎_𝐏 𝐔 𝐁 𝐆 𝐌

Channel

𝐙 𝐄 𝐑 𝐎_𝐏 𝐔 𝐁 𝐆 𝐌

@zero_avee

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

153subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004324317766
TypeChannel
Username@zero_avee
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 6 August 2026 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zero_avee

Growth

153192172.57 August 2026 β€” 192 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 191 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 191 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 166 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 153 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 147–198 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 19:24153-13
24 Aug 2026, 19:27166-25
8 Aug 2026, 12:00191no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:18191-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:18192first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
40.6%
avg views Γ· 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
62.1
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total1,243
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀550.0%
πŸ‘330.0%
⚑110.0%
πŸŽ‰110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

SHU LIVIK LOBBIDA QATNASHGANLA UCHUN TEKIN TURNIR HAM QLB BERAMIZ PRIZZLI ⚑️ NARIGI KANALDA πŸ“Œ

πŸ‘2

8 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC23 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

SHU 20 TA ODAMLA HAMMASI QATNASHSA SOLO QLB BOSHLAVORAMIZMI ?

  1. GOO69%
  2. DUO oynimiz31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

πŸŽ‰1

8 Aug 2026, 08:30 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

Jgarla shu 19 ta odam aniq qatnashadimi ? Manga yozila kanal bor shu turnir uchun Qoshib qoyaman 🀝

8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

CLASSIK TURNIR Qatnashaszlarmi jgarla ? Ha yoki yoq dela?

  1. Ha68%
  2. Yoq42%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC44 viewsread 8 August 2026

Jgarla qatnashadiganlar @user tashela kanalga qoshib qoyaman ⚑️

7 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

ZERO PUBGMDAN CLASSIK TURNIRGA START BERILDI ⁉️ DUO πŸ‘₯️ TOP 5 GACHA PRIZZ BOΚ»LADI βœ…οΈ QATNASHISH 2 KISHI UCHUN 5.000UZS βœ…οΈ https://t.me/zero_avee KANAL❗️ QATNASHADIGANLAR @hasanovzw ga yozila πŸ“Œ 25 ta JAMOA OLINADI πŸ“ŒπŸ”₯ XARITA: LIVIK

❀2

7 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

QATNASHISH PULLIK BOʻLADI LEKIN KOʻP EMAS 5.000 uzs koʻp bomaydi 🀝 2 kishi uchun

❀1

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC109 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

CLASSIK TURNIR CLASSIK TURNIRDA QATNASHADIGANLA BORMI ⁉️ DUO πŸ‘₯️ TOP 5 GACHA PRIZ VA BITTA BONUS HAM BOR U SIR

  1. QATNASHAMAN ⚑️67%
  2. Qatnashomiyman ✨️33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

SOLO BOSINMI ❓️ DUO BOSINMI ❓️

  1. Solo. Priz koΚ»pro boladi❗️39%
  2. Duo priz kamro boΚ»ladi ❕️67%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Jgarla ❗️ Open budget boshlanishiga ham oz fursat qoldi πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Ώ (22-avgust) da boshlanadi ovoz bermoqchi boganla oΚ»sha payti yozaman chiroyli narxlarda olib qolaman Qimmatlagan payti aytaman oΚ»zim shungacha ovoz bermay turila ❗️

⚑1πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zero_avee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

SHU 20 TA ODAMLA HAMMASI QATNASHSA SOLO QLB BOSHLAVORAMIZMI ?

  1. GOO69%
  2. DUO oynimiz31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

CLASSIK TURNIR Qatnashaszlarmi jgarla ? Ha yoki yoq dela?

  1. Ha68%
  2. Yoq42%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTCAnonymous Poll9 voters

CLASSIK TURNIR CLASSIK TURNIRDA QATNASHADIGANLA BORMI ⁉️ DUO πŸ‘₯️ TOP 5 GACHA PRIZ VA BITTA BONUS HAM BOR U SIR

  1. QATNASHAMAN ⚑️67%
  2. Qatnashomiyman ✨️33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

SOLO BOSINMI ❓️ DUO BOSINMI ❓️

  1. Solo. Priz koΚ»pro boladi❗️39%
  2. Duo priz kamro boΚ»ladi ❕️67%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ™ 𝐄 𝐑 𝐎_𝐏 𝐔 𝐁 𝐆 πŒβ€ (@zero_avee), 153 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zero_avee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.