可以领取空投了:https://universalx.app/grow/airdrop 给大家一个参考,我70W分,得61个币

Channel
币圈web3空投分享
@zero_airdrop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002006810082 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zero_airdrop |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zero_airdrop |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 56 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 56 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2024 to 25 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
可以领空投了: https://app.waveonsui.com/airdrop 如果没有到这申述: https://forms.gle/UNswv58rY2sNsUv3A
可以查看空投数量了,这傻逼项目方让我答一堆题然后告诉我没资格,回去一看数据全被清空了
🎁空投领取: https://claim.gopluslabs.io/ 连接你的okx钱包查询使用base链领取$GPS空投代币,目前链上价格0.07$
有做的兄弟记得点击start去网页版连接TON和SOL钱包,说是30号快照,现在还在出积分任务,不知道搞的什么,听说是blum团队的项目,果然一样畜生,另外这次的限时任务是刮刮乐
30号快照,记得去看看PAWS有没有变成石头,如果变了点击PAWSMAS做任务取回
符合空投资格的兄弟可以看到左上角有金色的勾,记得去提交bitget的uid和ETH充币地址还有账号邮箱
兄弟们做过币安megadrop的钱包查下空投 BSC合约地址:0x4ad663403df2f0e7987bc9c74561687472e1611c 直接添加进钱包,目前空投价值大概6U
🎁空投领取:https://believe.xion.burnt.com/ 兄弟们可以查一些,有空投的兄弟估计是大毛,不过大部分兄弟应该和我一样毛都没有。有的人6000多分啥也没有,有的人1000多分却有不少的分配,项目方也没有公布空投标准,所以也不清楚是怎么分配的,感觉更像随机抽取。
🎁已经可用查空投了,如果你的钱包收到了LlamaPay的OP链的ETH,那就是有资格,目前代币还没有价格,有37天的领取时间,不着急领 查询地址: https://airdrop.walletconnect.network/ 代币合约: 0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945 🖼️另外项目方还在zora发了一个NFT,0.3U一个,感兴趣的可以打下👇https://zora.co/collect/zora:0x3cfd2a16378e46b50654bcfa022a94f7536a26d9/1?referrer=0xa1170D21a2d935C87D30AC7d95C88b2c89C4CB76 就当同时埋伏zora和WCT了
空投已经发到okx交易所了
📸21日将拍摄快照 点击👉这里 绑定你的社交账号 加入官方的电报频道 加入官方的DC频道(目前已满员,等待官方新的频道) 关注官方推特 具体空投规则在👉这里
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @zero_airdrop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,156,615 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@zero_airdrop named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“币圈web3空投分享” (@zero_airdrop), 56 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zero_airdrop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.